If and , then we know that
If and , must it be true that
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Method 1 : Test out some values.
Consider the case when a = 8 , b = 6 , c = 5 , d = 4 ,
then a > b is indeed true and c > d in indeed true as well, thus the constraints a > b and c > d are satisfied. And also a − c = 2 and b − d = 1 , so a − c > b − d is also true as well.
So the inequality is true for this instance when a = 8 , b = 6 , c = 5 , d = 4 .
Consider another case when a = 8 , b = 7 , c = 6 , d = 4 , then a > b is indeed true and c > d in indeed true as well, thus the constraints a > b and c > d are satisfied. However a − c = 1 and b − d = 2 , so a − c > b − d can't be true.
So the inequality is not true for this instance when a = 8 , b = 6 , c = 5 , d = 4 .
In other words, the inequality is not always true and not always false either. And thus the answer is "No, it's not always true".
Method 2 : Rearranging the terms in the inequality.
Looking at answer choices tells us that we want to determine whether the inequality , a − c > b − d is always true, or always false, or not necessarily true.
Determining the truth of the inequality a − c > b − d is similar of determining the truth of the inequality a − b > c − d .
Since we know that the constraints a > b and c > d must be satisfied, then a − b > 0 and c − d > 0 must be satisfied also. So we know that a − b and c − d are strictly positive but there isn't sufficient information to know whether which of these numbers ( a − b , c − d ) , this is because we could have
a − b > c − d > 0 or c − d > a − b > 0 or a − b = c − d > 0 .
Since at least of the inequation/equation above must be true, then our claim of a − b > c − d must not be strictly true or false only, hence we will arrive at the same conclusion as Method 1.