Given that f ( x ) + f ( x + 1 ) = x for all values of x , what is the value of
2 f ( 0 ) + f ( 2 0 1 3 ) ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
ok this one was sick >.<
great
ya
The given equation is f ( x ) + f ( x + 1 ) = x .
f ( 0 ) + f ( 1 ) = 0
f ( 1 ) = 0 − f ( 0 )
f ( 1 ) + f ( 2 ) = 1
f ( 2 ) = 1 − f ( 1 ) = 1 − 0 + f ( 0 ) = 1 + f ( 0 )
f ( 2 ) = 1 + f ( 0 )
f ( 2 ) + f ( 3 ) = 2
f ( 3 ) = 2 − f ( 2 ) = 2 − 1 − f ( 0 ) = 1 − f ( 0 )
f ( 3 ) = 1 − f ( 0 )
f ( 3 ) + f ( 4 ) = 3
f ( 4 ) = 3 − f ( 3 ) = 3 − 1 + f ( 0 ) = 2 + f ( 0 )
f ( 4 ) = 2 + f ( 0 )
f ( 4 ) + f ( 5 ) = 4
f ( 5 ) = 4 − f ( 4 ) = 4 − 2 − f ( 0 ) = 2 − f ( 0 )
f ( 5 ) = 2 − f ( 0 )
Here it is:
When n is odd, f ( n ) = 2 ( n − 1 ) − f ( 0 )
When n is even, f ( n ) = 2 ( n ) + f ( 0 )
So,
Hence,
That's the answer!
this is much better explanation and extremely easier steps to understand...:)
nice i followed same procedure
I solved by applying a similar technique. Telescoping series usually makes things simpler.
Given f ( x ) + f ( x + 1 ) = x , Then f ( x + 1 ) = x − f ( x ) *use this formula *
f ( 2 0 1 3 )
= f ( 2 0 1 2 + 1 )
= 2 0 1 2 − f ( 2 0 1 2 )
= 2 0 1 2 − 2 0 1 1 + f ( 2 0 1 1 )
= 1 + f ( 2 0 1 1 ) <-----
= 1 + 2 0 1 0 − f ( 2 0 1 0 )
= 1 + 2 0 1 0 − 2 0 0 9 + f ( 2 0 0 9 )
= 1 + 1 + f ( 2 0 0 9 ) <----- if f ( n ) minus 2 ,will plus 1.
Because 2 0 1 3 minus 1 0 0 6 × 2 left 1 .So that ,will plus 1 0 0 6 .
At last f ( 2 0 1 3 ) will become 1 0 0 6 + f ( 1 )
Then, f ( 1 ) = 0 − f ( 0 )
Substitute to the question:
2 f ( 0 ) + 1 0 0 6 − f ( 0 )
= 2 1 0 0 6
5 0 3
f(2x+1)+f(0)=x -> f(2*1006 + 1) + f(0) = 1006 -> [f(2013)+f(0)]/2=1006/2=503
he didn't say f(2x+1) ?
please explain..?
Agree. How did you get f(2x + 1)?
I think like that :D
let f ( x ) = x ,then f ( x + 1 ) = x + 1
So that, f ( x ) + f ( x + 1 ) = x will become
x + x + 1 = x
0 + 2 x + 1 = x
f ( 0 ) + f ( 2 x + 1 ) = x
am i right?:D
Log in to reply
You can't let f ( x ) = x for any reason.
First you must observe that
f ( 2 0 1 3 ) = f ( 2 0 1 2 + 1 ) = ( 2 0 1 2 − 2 0 1 1 ) + ( 2 0 1 0 − 2 0 0 9 ) + ⋯ + ( 2 − 1 ) + ( 0 − f ( 0 ) )
Also observe that we have 2 0 1 2 / 2 subtractions in parenthesis until ( 2 − 1 ) (inclusive). All those subtractions have value 1 so that
2 f ( 0 ) + f ( 2 0 1 3 ) = 2 f ( 0 ) + 2 2 0 1 2 − f ( 0 ) = 4 2 0 1 2 = 5 0 3
putting x=0 f(0)+f(1)=0 putting x=1 and multiplying whole expression by -1 -f(1)-f(2)=-1 then x=2 f(2)+f(3)=2 then x=3 and multiplying whole expression by -1 -f(3)-f(4)=-3 similarly following this putting of x and multiplying whole expression by -1 when x is odd
in end we get f(1)+f(2013)=0-1+2-3+4.......-2011+2012 = 1006
so (f(1)+f(2013))/2 =503
Phew. This is going to be lengthy.
When the question mentioned "sum of consecutive functions", I immediately started to figure out what kind of pattern does it have. I started out with a few questions:
f ( x ) + f ( x + 1 ) = x is true if both the number are consecutive to each other. For example, f ( 5 0 ) + f ( 5 1 ) = 5 0
However, if we try to find f ( x ) + f ( n ) , it would be impossible with reasoning itself (from the best of my capability)
Hence, I begin looking for a pattern that allows the operation f ( x ) + f ( n ) to be able to find its answer easily.
We want to find the general formula for f ( x ) + f ( n ) that satisfies all the values of x and n , where x and n are not consecutive/adjacent to each other.
Let us start with x = 0 and n = 1
f ( 0 ) + f ( 1 ) = 0 -- (1)
f ( 1 ) + f ( 2 ) = 1 -- (2)
Hence, we want (1) to have the function f(2) in it.
From (2),
f ( 1 ) = 1 − f ( 2 )
So, f ( 0 ) + ( 1 − f ( 2 ) ) = 0
f ( 0 ) − f ( 2 ) = − 1
Weird enough, -1 is the difference of f(0) and f(2). That is not what we're hoping for. But,
f ( 2 ) + f ( 3 ) = 2
f ( 2 ) = 2 − f ( 3 )
Hence,
f ( 0 ) − ( 2 − f ( 3 ) ) = − 1
f ( 0 ) + f ( 3 ) = 1
We see that it becomes a sum when the next number comes in. Using the same method to insert the next function,
f ( 0 ) − f ( 4 ) = − 2
f ( 0 ) + f ( 5 ) = 2
f ( 0 ) − f ( 6 ) = − 3
f ( 0 ) + f ( 7 ) = 3
We can see a pattern where the result increases by one for every consecutive odd integer. This applies to even integers as well, except that they are negative values instead.
Hence,
f ( x ) + f ( n ) = 2 n − 1 for n = odd integer when x = 0
Of course, this equation is only true for x=0.
Hence, taking n = 2013,
f ( x ) + f ( 2 0 1 3 ) = 2 2 0 1 3 − 1 = 1 0 0 6
Giving us 503 when halved again.
I t ′ s e a s y t o s h o w t h a t t h e f u n c t i o n i s : f ( x ) = 2 1 x − 4 1
assume x=0, f(0)+f(1)=0 ------ (1)
x=1, f(1)+f(2)=1 ------(2)
.
.
.
.
x=2012, f(2012)+f(2013)=2012 ------(2013)
the value could be obtained by solving as follows..
(1)-(2)+ ..........+(2013)
f(0)+f(2013)=0-1+2-3+4-5+..........+2012
=(2+4+6+8+.......+2012)-(1+3+5+7+9+.....2011)
=[(1006)(1006)]+1006-[(1006)(1006)]
=1006
therefore, the value of [f(0)+f(2013)]/2 is 503
thank you
f(2013)= 2012-f(2012)= 2012-{2011-f(2011)}=1+f(2011)=.......=2+f(2009)=........=3+f(2007)=....=1006+f(1)=1006+0-f(0) =>{f(o)+f(2013)}/2=503
f(0)+f(1)=1. f(0)=-f(1). f(1)+f(2)=1. f(1)=1-f(2)................................ Then we get f(0)=1006-f(2013). Then( f(0)+f(2013))/2=1006/2=503
We can solve this problem with telescoping pattern, we have f(0) + f(1) = 0 ; f(1) + f(2) = 1; f(2) + f(3) = 2 ; ... ; f(2012) + f(2013) = 2012. Next, we sum(+/- , "telescoping pattern" ) all of statements above ---> f(0) + f(1) f(1) + f(2) f(2) + f(3) + ... - f(2012) + f(2012) + f(2013) = (0 - 1 + 2 - 3 + ... - 2011 + 2012)/2 = 1*1006/2 = 503. Answer : 503
f ( 0 ) + f ( 1 ) = 0
f ( 1 ) + f ( 2 ) = 1 = > f ( 1 ) = 1- f ( 2 )
f ( 2 ) = 2- f ( 3 )
f ( 3 ) = 3- f ( 4 )
...
f ( 0 ) + f ( 1 ) =0 < = > f ( 0 ) +1-2+3-4+5-...+2011-2012+ f ( 2 0 1 3 ) =0
f ( 0 ) + f ( 2 0 1 3 ) =2012-2011+2010-2009+...+2-1 = 2 2 0 1 2 = 1006
2 f ( 0 ) + f ( 2 0 1 3 ) = 5 0 3
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
The above equation can be rearranged as f ( x + 1 ) = x − f ( x )
Then, f ( 2 0 1 3 ) = 2 0 1 2 − f ( 2 0 1 2 )
Similarly, f ( 2 0 1 2 ) = 2 0 1 1 − f ( 2 0 1 1 )
Substituting this value of f ( 2 0 1 2 ) in above equation gives
f ( 2 0 1 3 ) = 1 + f ( 2 0 1 1 )
Since f ( 2 0 1 1 ) = 1 + f ( 2 0 0 9 ) ,
f ( 2 0 1 3 ) = 2 + f ( 2 0 0 9 )
f ( 2 0 1 3 ) = 3 + f ( 2 0 0 7 )
f ( 2 0 1 3 ) = 4 + f ( 2 0 0 5 )
f ( 2 0 1 3 ) = 5 + f ( 2 0 0 3 )
f ( 2 0 1 3 ) = 6 + f ( 2 0 0 1 )
a b c ⋮
f ( 2 0 1 3 ) = 1 0 0 6 + f ( 1 )
Substituting this value in the question expression
2 f ( 0 ) + f ( 1 ) + 1 0 0 6
However, f ( 0 ) + f ( 1 ) = 0
So, the answer is 2 1 0 0 6
= 5 0 3