For each positive integer n , S n is the sum of the first n consecutive prime numbers.
For example:
n = 1 n = 2 ⟹ S 1 = 2 ⟹ S 2 = 2 + 3 = 5
Arrange these numbers in a sequence of ascending order: S 1 , S 2 , S 3 , . . . . Is the statement below true or false?
In the sequence above, we can always find two consecutive numbers which are both perfect squares.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Excuse me, but I don't understand why ( 2 p n + 1 ) 2 can be interpreted as sum of all odd numbers up to p n ?
Log in to reply
If o n = 2 n − 1 is the nth odd number, then n = 2 o n + 1 .
The sum of the first n odd numbers is n 2 (see properties of square numbers or sum of arithmetic progression ).
Therefore, the sum of all odd numbers up to o n is ( 2 o n + 1 ) 2
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
By contradiction assume there exist integers S n − 1 and S n .
By definition S n − S n − 1 = p n , where p n is the nth prime.
( S n + S n − 1 ) ( S n − S n − 1 ) = p n
Since p n is prime, the two factors above must be:
( S n + S n − 1 ) = p n
( S n − S n − 1 ) = 1
Adding both equations gives:
2 S n = p n + 1
S n = ( 2 p n + 1 ) 2
The expression ( 2 p n + 1 ) 2 can be interpreted as the sum of all odd numbers up to p n .
However, these values will never be equal, since S n will be greater than the sum of odd numbers up to n = 4 due to the even prime 2 , and less afterwards due to non-prime odd numbers being skipped, starting with 9 .