For a rational number x that equals b a in lowest terms, let f ( x ) = a b .
What is the value of x ∈ Q + ∑ f ( x ) 2 1 , where the sum extends over all positive rationals?
Bonus: More generally, exhibit an infinite sequence of distinct rational exponents s such that x ∈ Q + ∑ f ( x ) − s is rational.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Indeed x ∈ Q + ∑ f ( x ) n 1 = ζ ( 2 n ) ζ ( n ) 2 for any n ≥ 2 , and hence this sum is rational whenever n is an even positive integer.
What does that symbol u used before 2^2 mean??
Log in to reply
It's the Riemann Zeta Function . See formula (9) in the link.
How inclusion exclusion gives the desired result ? How it is 1-1/p^4 ????
We first note that F ( s ) = x ∈ Q + ∑ f ( x ) s 1 = gcd ( a , b ) = 1 a , b = 1 ∑ ∞ ( a ⋅ b ) s 1 . Moreover for s > 1 we have that ζ ( s ) 2 = ( a = 1 ∑ ∞ a s 1 ) 2 = a , b = 1 ∑ ∞ ( a ⋅ b ) s 1 = d = 1 ∑ ∞ gcd ( a , b ) = d a , b = 1 ∑ ∞ ( a ⋅ b ) s 1 = d = 1 ∑ ∞ d 2 s 1 ⋅ gcd ( a , b ) = 1 a , b = 1 ∑ ∞ ( a ⋅ b ) s 1 = ζ ( 2 s ) ⋅ F ( s ) where ζ ( s ) is Riemann zeta function . Therefore if s is a positive even number 2 n then the sum converges to F ( 2 n ) = ζ ( 4 n ) ζ ( 2 n ) 2 = ( − 1 ) 2 n − 1 ( 4 n ) ! 2 4 n − 1 B 4 n π 4 n ( ( − 1 ) n − 1 ( 2 n ) ! 2 2 n − 1 B 2 n π 2 n ) 2 = ( 2 n 4 n ) 2 ∣ B 4 n ∣ B 2 n 2 ∈ Q where B k is the k -th Bernoulli number (it is rational!). Here there are some values of the function F ( 2 ) = 2 5 , F ( 4 ) = 6 7 , F ( 6 ) = 6 9 1 7 1 5 , F ( 8 ) = 7 2 3 4 7 2 9 3 .
We are looking for x = ( α , β ) = 1 ∑ α 2 β 2 1 .
Define c = gcd ( a , b ) , a = c α , b = c β . Then
( a ∑ a 2 1 ) ( b ∑ b 2 1 ) = a , b ∑ a 2 b 2 1 = c ∑ ( α , β ) = 1 ∑ ( c α ) 2 ( c β ) 2 1 = ( c ∑ c 4 1 ) ⎝ ⎛ ( α , β ) = 1 ∑ α 2 β 2 1 ⎠ ⎞ . Thus ζ ( 2 ) 2 = ζ ( 4 ) x , and x = ζ ( 4 ) ζ ( 2 ) 2 = π 4 / 9 0 ( π 2 / 6 ) 2 = 3 6 9 0 = 2 2 1 .
The result is rigth and awesome. But the the produ t of 2 infinites series is not always the sum of the product of the arguments Please can you proof that(probably it should start from the cauchy product of 2 series)in order to make your resolution complete ?
I'm not sure if we can consider that as a solution
First , I've observed that when a b become higher, f ( x ) 2 1 become smaller.
So with a simple Python script, I calculated the 50th first terms for a and b
1 2 3 4 5 6 |
|
output: 2.44505876736
So we can conclude that the result is close to 2 . 5
That's quite the leap. I used the first 300 terms of https://oeis.org/A034444 to get 2.497709839 from which I was much more certain of 2.5
Log in to reply
I did this with subsequently higher upper bounds to infer that the result approached 2.5 as the upper bound approached infinity
Right, I'm a little late to the party
The number of x that satisfies f ( x ) = q is the number of ways to partition the distinct prime factors of q into 2 ordered groups: The number of such x equals 2 ω ( q ) , where ω ( n ) is the number of distinct prime factors of n . Hence, using the substitution f ( x ) = n , the sum equates: ∑ n ≥ 0 n s 2 ω ( n ) = ∑ n ≥ 0 n s ∣ μ ∣ ∗ 1 ( n ) = ζ ( s ) ζ ( 2 s ) ζ ( s ) = ζ ( 2 s ) ζ ( s ) 2
Find ratio of
[double sum {(1/n^2)(1/m^2)} from n & m =1 to Inf ] = (π^4/36)
with
[sum {1/n^4} from n=1 to Inf ] = (π^4/90) ,
using WolframAlpha.
Answer=2.5
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Relevant wiki: Principle of Inclusion and Exclusion Problem Solving
If we allow all positive integers a , b , we find ∑ a , b a 2 b 2 1 = ζ ( 2 ) 2 . If we exclude all a , b with a fixed common prime divisor p , we find ∑ a , b a 2 b 2 1 = ( 1 − p 4 1 ) ζ ( 2 ) 2 . If we exclude all a , b with g cd ( a , b ) = 1 , we find ∑ g cd ( a , b ) = 1 a 2 b 2 1 = ∏ p ( 1 − p 4 1 ) ζ ( 2 ) 2 = ζ ( 4 ) ζ ( 2 ) 2 = 2 . 5 , by the inclusion-exclusion principle.