Summer of 69 Part-2

Calculus Level 5

Evaluate :

d 69 ( a r c t a n ( x ) ) d x 69 a t x = 5 \frac { { d }^{ 69 }(arctan(x)) }{ d{ x }^{ 69 } } \quad at\quad x=5

The answer is of the form x 10 47 x*{ 10 }^{ 47 } .

Find x x .

This question requires lots and lots of patience if not proceeded properly.


The answer is 3.289.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Aditya Kumar
May 3, 2015

d n ( a r c t a n ( x ) ) d x n = ( 1 ) n 1 ( n 1 ) ! ( 1 + x 2 ) n 2 s i n ( n . a r c s i n ( 1 1 + x 2 ) ) W e c a n p r o v e t h e a b o v e t h e o r e m b y i n d u c t i o n . O n s u b s t i t u t i n g v a l u e s w e g e t , d 69 ( a r c t a n ( x ) ) d x 69 ( a t x = 5 ) = 3.289 10 47 \frac { { d }^{ n }(arctan(x)) }{ d{ x }^{ n } } \quad =\quad \frac { { (-1) }^{ n-1 }(n-1)! }{ { (1+{ x }^{ 2 }) }^{ \frac { n }{ 2 } } } sin\left( n.arcsin\left( \frac { 1 }{ \sqrt { 1+{ x }^{ 2 } } } \right) \right) \\ We\quad can\quad prove\quad the\quad above\quad theorem\quad by\quad induction.\\ On\quad substituting\quad values\quad we\quad get,\\ \frac { { d }^{ 69 }(arctan(x)) }{ d{ x }^{ 69 } } \quad (at\quad x=5)\quad =\quad 3.289*{ 10 }^{ 47 }

There is another way to solve this but that requires an insane amount of work (computing power). Take the derivative as S S .

Using the Maclaurin series for arctan ( x ) \arctan(x) for x 1 x\geq 1 and then interchanging derivative operator and summation operator, you can get,

2 5 34 × S = i = 1 ( ( 1 ) i + 1 ( m = 0 67 ( 2 i m ) ) 1 2 5 i ) S = 1 2 5 34 i = 1 ( ( 1 ) i + 1 ( 2 i + 67 ) ! ( 2 i 1 ) ! 1 2 5 i ) 25^{34}\times S=\sum_{i=1}^\infty\left((-1)^{i+1}\left(\prod_{m=0}^{67}(-2i-m)\right)\frac{1}{25^i}\right)\\ \implies S=\frac{1}{25^{34}}\sum_{i=1}^\infty\left((-1)^{i+1}\frac{(2i+67)!}{(2i-1)!}\cdot\frac{1}{25^i}\right)

By ratio test, the sum on the right side converges. Now, we can use some computing power (software like Maxima, or W|A) or even manually calculate the partial sums and then conclude our answer. This, obviously requires a lot of manual labor and hence the theorem you presented is a better alternative but it just presents no idea as to how someone gets the motivation to make that claim. It just doesn't seem obvious to me.


EDIT: I think I found the source of your theorem. Here is the link of the pdf with a direct proof of it too.

Prasun Biswas - 6 years, 1 month ago

Log in to reply

Yes there are several ways to solve it @Prasun Biswas .

Aditya Kumar - 6 years, 1 month ago

like u said ... i have another method which forms a recurrence relation b\w nth derivatives at x=5 ..... but solving that relation is horrible!!

Abhinav Raichur - 6 years ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...