You should know that
b a + d c = b + d a + c .
However, if a , b , c , d are positive integers that satisfy b a < d c , what can we say about b + d a + c ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
That is one way to make the comparison.
Another approach is to think about the average when you combine two groups together. The new average is going to be between the original ones.
Nice solution.
Imagine for a second that you had a = c and b = d . This would mean that b + d a + c = 2 d 2 c = d c . Now think about increasing b . This would clearly make b a < d c , but it would also make the denominator of b + d a + c bigger, meaning that b + d a + c must now be less than d c .
The same argument can be made by making c bigger. b + d a + c = 2 b 2 a = b a . Making c bigger gives us b a < d c and makes the numerator of b + d a + c bigger, meaning that we now have the identity b a < b + d a + c .
I'm confused by what you are trying to say. Can you try and express yourself in another way?
Log in to reply
Sorry if I was unclear! If you increase the denominator of a fraction, you decrease the value of the fraction itself. We start out with b + d a + c = d c . If we increase b , then we increase b + d . b + d is the denominator of b + d a + c , so if we increase b + d we are also decreasing the value of b + d a + c . Since we had originally set this fraction equal to d c , and b + d a + c is now smaller than it once was, we now must have the identity b + d a + c < d c . This method can be applied in reverse to get b a < b + d a + c , thereby giving us the answer we needed.
Given a/b<c/d, then:
ad<bc ...(1)
Let us prove that a/b < (a+c)/(b+d) < c/d, by considering both inequalities separately:
To show that a/b < (a+c)/(b+d);
a(b+d)<b(a+c)
ad<bc ...(2)
To show that (a+c)/(b+d) < c/d;
(a+c)d<c(b+d)
ad<bc ...(3)
Hence, a/b < (a+c)/(b+d) < c/d must be true, and it is the only option that is true.
Direct algebraic manipulation would allow us to arrive at the answer. The condition that all of these numbers are positive, makes it easier for us to deal with the inequalities as the sign does not change.
There is a simple reason to arrive at the conclusion. Can you figure out another way?
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
b a < d c and a , b > 0
⇒ a d < b c [Multiplying with the positive expression b d on both sides].
Therefore, a d < b c ⇒ a d + a b < a b + b c ⇒ a ( b + d ) < b ( a + c )
⇒ b a < b + d a + c [Dividing by the positive expression ( b + d ) b on both sides]
Similarly, we also have a d < b c ⇒ a d + c d < b c + c d ⇒ b + d a + c < d c .
We now finally have b a < b + d a + c < d c