Can ⟨ 6 , 8 ⟩ be expressed as the sum of nine unit vectors?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Couldn't you have different unit vectors in the same direction as <6, 8> that can possibly sum up 9 times to express <6, 8> ?
Let's name this vector ⟨ 6 , 8 ⟩ as v and suppose for purposes of contradiction that there is some collection of nine unit vectors { u i } i = 1 9 such that v = i = 1 ∑ 9 u i . Then surely the magnitude of both v and that sum must be equal. Applying the triangle inequality yields:
∥ v ∥ = ∥ ∥ ∥ ∥ ∥ i = 1 ∑ 9 u i ∥ ∥ ∥ ∥ ∥ ≤ i = 1 ∑ 9 ∥ u i ∥
Since the vectors u i are unit vectors, the sum on the right evaluates to 9, but v itself has magnitude 6 2 + 8 2 = 1 0 0 = 1 0 . So we have 1 0 ≤ 9 , contradiction. It follows that v can't be exrpressed as a sum of nine unit vectors □ .
With Vector (6,*), Max 10 unit vectors are possible. The question of 9 unit vectors is out.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Since each unit vector is of magnitude 1, the largest magnitude that the sum of nine unit vectors could possibly be is 9, but the given vector has a magnitude of 10, so no choice of nine unit vectors will achieve ⟨ 6 , 8 ⟩ .