x → 0 lim ( cos x ) sin 2 x 1
This limit can be written as e b where b is a rational number. Submit b
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Nice approach sir, thank you. I would have never thought to do it like this.... I have would used l n first and Mc Laurin series later...., ln ( cos x ) = ln ( 1 + ( cos x − 1 ) ) ~ ( cos x − 1 ) ~ 2 ! − x 2 when x → 0 and sin 2 x ~ x 2 when x → 0 . You have given me one idea, I'm going to post another limit with e x
Let f ( x ) = cos ( x ) and g ( x ) = sin 2 ( x ) 1 (easier for me to type :P).
Since, x → 0 lim f ( x ) = 1 and x → 0 lim ( f ( x ) − 1 ) g ( x ) exists(it is equal to -1/2),
x → 0 lim f ( x ) g ( x ) = e lim x → 0 ( f ( x ) − 1 ) g ( x ) = e − 1 / 2 .
Therefore b is 2 − 1 .
haha, similar form than the other limit, you can see my comment to Chew... Thank you, anyway
Just only one little comment more Svatejas,don't misunderstanding me, it's limit when x → 0
Let y = x → 0 lim ( cos x ) sin 2 x 1 . Then ln y = x → 0 lim sin 2 x ln cos x
We have a limit in the form 0 0 so we may apply L'Hopital's rule. That gives us ln y = x → 0 lim 2 sin x cos x cos x sin x
That reduces to ln y = x → 0 lim 2 cos 2 x − 1 which becomes ln y = 2 − 1 .
But what is y ? Simply exponentiate both sides. e ln y = y = e 2 − 1
The exponent was required for the answer, which is simply − 0 . 5 .
Only one small thing Hobart, the answer is correct, but what is the derivative of ln cos x?
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
x → 0 lim ( cos x ) sin 2 x 1 = u → 0 lim ( 1 − u 2 ) u 2 1 Let u = sin x = u → 0 lim ( 1 − u 2 ) 2 u 2 1 Let n = 2 u 2 1 ⇒ u 2 = 2 n 1 = n → ∞ lim ( 1 + n − 2 1 ) n = e − 2 1
⇒ b = − 0 . 5