Sylow and 168

Algebra Level 3

Let G G be a simple group with 168 elements. How many elements of order 7 does G G contain?

Notation: An element g G g\in G has order 7 if g 7 = 1 g^7 = 1 but g x 1 g^x \ne 1 for any positive integer x < 7. x<7. (Here 1 1 is the identity of the group G . G. )


The answer is 48.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Patrick Corn
Jun 26, 2016

The third Sylow theorem says that the number n 7 n_7 of Sylow 7 7 -subgroups is 1 ( m o d 7 ) \equiv 1 \pmod 7 and divides 168 / 7 = 24. 168/7 = 24. So n 7 = 1 n_7=1 or 8. 8. If n 7 = 1 n_7=1 then the unique Sylow 7 7 -subgroup is a normal subgroup , so G G is not simple.

So n 7 = 8. n_7=8. There are 8 8 distinct subgroups of order 7. 7. The order of every non-identity element in each subgroup is 7 7 (it divides 7 7 by Lagrange's theorem ), so there are six non-identity elements in each subgroup with order 7. 7. Also, any two Sylow 7 7 -subgroups have trivial intersection (their intersection has order dividing 7 7 by Lagrange's theorem, and if it equals 7 7 then they are the same subgroup). So these six elements are distinct. There are thus a total of 6 8 = 48 6 \cdot 8 = \fbox{48} elements of order 7 7 in these subgroups.

Finally, any element g g of order 7 7 generates a cyclic subgroup of order 7 , 7, namely { 1 , g , g 2 , , g 6 } . \{1,g,g^2,\ldots,g^6\}. This is a Sylow 7 7 -subgroup. So g g is contained in one of these Sylow 7 7 -subgroups, so these 48 48 elements are all the elements of order 7. 7.

( Aside: It can be shown that G G L 3 ( F 2 ) , G \cong GL_3({\mathbb F}_2), the group of invertible 3 × 3 3\times 3 matrices with entries in the field with two elements. For extra extra credit, try to write down the 48 48 elements of order 7 7 in G G explicitly!)

Oh crap ! Did every thing correct but instead of (7-1) 8 for mysterious reasons I calculated 7 (8-1) !!

Bhaskar Pandey - 10 months, 1 week ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...