"There exists a 2D figure with exactly m line(s) of symmetry and rotational symmetry of order n ."
Suppose the above statement is called T ( m , n ) . Let the function f : Z ≥ 0 × Z > 0 → Z be defined as:
f ( m , n ) = { m + n 0 if T ( m , n ) is true if T ( m , n ) is false
If
g
:
Z
>
0
→
Z
is defined as
g
(
x
)
=
m
=
0
∑
x
n
=
1
∑
x
f
(
m
,
n
)
,
find
x
→
∞
lim
x
2
g
(
x
)
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Yes, this boils down to proving that claim. Is there a simple way of showing it?
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Theorem If a figure has m = 0 lines of symmetry, then it can have rotational symmetry of order n = 1 , 2 , 3 , … . If a figure has m > 0 lines of symmetry, then it will have rotational symmetry of order n = m .
Proof (Coming Soon)
Therefore f ( 0 , n ) = n for all positive integers n , f ( m , n ) = m + n if m = n and f ( m , n ) = 0 if m = n .
We have g ( x ) = n = 1 ∑ x f ( 0 , n ) + n = 1 ∑ x f ( n , n ) = n = 1 ∑ x n + n = 1 ∑ x ( n + n ) = n = 1 ∑ x 3 n = 2 3 x ( x + 1 )
We obtain x 2 g ( x ) = 2 3 ⋅ x 2 x 2 + x
Therefore x → ∞ lim x 2 g ( x ) = 2 3 × 1 = 1 . 5 □