Tax deduction

I'm visiting an unfamiliar state. This state has a sales tax of 6.1 % 6.1\% but I don't know this. All I know is the tax rate is of the form a . b % \overline{a.b}\% where a a and b b are single digits.

I buy an item at a store and am able to deduce the tax rate from the item's price and the tax amount as listed on the receipt. What is the minimum cost of the item that would allow me to make such a deduction? (Answer in dollars, rounded to the nearest cent.)

Note: The tax amount listed on the receipt is rounded to the nearest cent.


The answer is 5.41.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Zico Quintina
Jul 5, 2018

[This feels like a very crude approach; hopefully someone else can post a more elegant way to find the answer.]

We are looking for the lowest cost, call it x x , such that when we calculate 6%, 6.1% and 6.2% of x x , the amounts rounded to the nearest cent would all be different, and since we are trying to minimize the cost, it stands to reason that the rounded amounts of cents would be consecutive whole numbers.

To simplify the calculations a little, we shall assume that x x is the cost in cents rather than in dollars. Then we are looking for x , n N x, n \in \mathbb{N} such that Round ( 0.06 x ) = n 1 (0.06x) = n-1 , Round ( 0.061 x ) = n (0.061x) = n and Round ( 0.062 x ) = n + 1 (0.062x) = n+1 .

The three unrounded amounts are evenly spaced, separated by 0.001 x 0.001x ; to minimize x x , we need to minimize these gaps. This can be achieved by finding x x such that 0.061 x 0.061x is "very" close to n n , while 0.06 x 0.06x and 0.062 x 0.062x are "slightly" below n 0.5 n - 0.5 and above n + 0.5 n + 0.5 respectively, as shown below.

So we need 0.001 x > 0.5 \ 0.001x > 0.5 \ , i.e. x > 500 \ x > 500 . Since 0.061 ( 500 ) = 30.5 0.061(500) = 30.5 , the tax amount n n must be at least 31 31 cents. The cost that would give that exact tax amount is 508.20 \approx 508.20 cents, so we check what happens at x = 508 x = 508 cents:

6 % : 508 ( 0.06 ) = 30.48 n = 30 cents 6.1 % : 508 ( 0.061 ) = 30.988 n = 31 cents 6.2 % : 508 ( 0.062 ) = 31.496 n = 31 cents \begin{array}{rlcrl} 6 \%: & 508(0.06) = 30.48 & \implies & & n = 30 \text{cents} \\ 6.1 \%: & 508(0.061) = 30.988 & \implies & & n = 31 \text{cents} \\ 6.2 \%: & 508(0.062) = 31.496 & \implies & & n = 31 \text{cents} \end{array}

The two higher tax rates give the same rounded tax amount, so this is not our solution. We try n = 32 n = 32 cents, but the cost for this tax amount is 524.59 \approx 524.59 cents which is not a good sign as it's further from a whole number cost than our previous attempt; and indeed this again does not yield three different rounded tax amounts. However, when n = 33 n = 33 cents, we find that the cost that would give that exact tax amount is 540.98 \approx 540.98 cents, which is promising as it's very close to a whole amount; we try x = 541 x = 541 cents:

6 % : 541 ( 0.06 ) = 32.46 n = 32 cents 6.1 % : 541 ( 0.061 ) = 33.001 n = 33 cents 6.2 % : 541 ( 0.062 ) = 33.542 n = 34 cents \begin{array}{rlcrl} 6 \%: & 541(0.06) = 32.46 & \implies & & n = 32 \text{cents} \\ 6.1 \%: & 541(0.061) = 33.001 & \implies & & n = 33 \text{cents} \\ 6.2 \%: & 541(0.062) = 33.542 & \implies & & n = 34 \text{cents} \end{array}

which gives us the required three different rounded tax amounts. So the cost we're looking for is 541 541 cents, i.e. $ 5.41 \boxed{\$5.41}

I didn't have time to enter my solution when I submitted this. Your solution uses the same reasoning as I would have but is much more thorough. I don't know that there's a more elegant way, refining the manual search to start at 500 cents is the key to beginning an efficient manual search in my opinion.

Incidentally, I chose 6.1% because it has the largest answer among all choices from 5.1% to 6.9%.

Jeremy Galvagni - 2 years, 11 months ago

Log in to reply

Thanks for letting me know; I waited a while before posting this because even though I felt my approach was valid I didn't like the way it ended up playing out. It annoyed me how much the simple rounding act made the analysis rougher, for lack of a better word. It does make me feel better knowing your thought process was similar. Your problems are always a fun challenge, I enjoy working on them (even if I can't always solve them.)

zico quintina - 2 years, 11 months ago
Brian Moehring
Jul 5, 2018

In order to be able to determine a tax rate of 6.1 % 6.1\% assuming we know it has the form a . b % \overline{a.b}\% , we simply need to be able to differentiate it from 6.0 % 6.0\% and 6.2 % 6.2\% . Writing the item's cost C C in cents and the tax T T also in cents, we have 0.06 C < T 0.5 0.061 C < T + 0.5 0.062 C 0.06C < T - 0.5 \leq 0.061C < T + 0.5 \leq 0.062C and solving for C C yields max { 1000 T 500 61 , 1000 T + 500 62 } C < min { 1000 T 500 60 , 1000 T + 500 61 } \max\left\{\frac{1000T-500}{61}, \frac{1000T+500}{62}\right\} \leq C < \min\left\{\frac{1000T-500}{60}, \frac{1000T+500}{61}\right\}

For T 60 T \leq 60 , this inequality becomes 1000 T + 500 62 C < 1000 T 500 60 \frac{1000T+500}{62} \leq C < \frac{1000T-500}{60} which implies 1000 T + 500 62 < 1000 T 500 60 T > 30.5 T 31 , \frac{1000T+500}{62} < \frac{1000T-500}{60} \iff T > 30.5 \iff T \geq 31, so we will define Δ = T 31 \Delta = T-31 and rewrite the inequality in terms of Δ \Delta using 1000 ( Δ + 31 ) + 500 62 = 16 Δ + 508 + 4 Δ + 2 31 1000 ( Δ + 31 ) 500 60 = 16 Δ + 508 + 2 Δ + 1 3 . \frac{1000(\Delta+31) + 500}{62} = 16\Delta + 508 + \frac{4\Delta + 2}{31} \\ \frac{1000(\Delta+31) - 500}{60} = 16\Delta + 508 + \frac{2\Delta+1}{3}. Therefore, noting M : = C 16 Δ 508 M := C - 16\Delta - 508 is an integer, we have for 0 Δ 29 0 \leq \Delta \leq 29 , 4 Δ + 2 31 M < 2 Δ + 1 3 \frac{4\Delta + 2}{31} \leq M < \frac{2\Delta+1}{3}

Now, minimizing Δ \Delta will minimize T T and therefore minimize C C , so we want to find the smallest integer Δ \Delta such that 0 Δ 29 0 \leq \Delta \leq 29 and [ 4 Δ + 2 31 , 2 Δ + 1 3 ) Z \left[\frac{4\Delta+2}{31}, \frac{2\Delta+1}{3}\right) \cap \mathbb{Z} \neq \emptyset

By direct observation, the smallest such solution is Δ = 2 \Delta = 2 , for which M = 1 M=1 . Therefore C = 16 Δ + 508 + M = 16 ( 2 ) + 508 + 1 = 541 C = 16\Delta + 508 + M = 16(2) + 508 + 1 = 541 which in dollars gives an answer of 5.41 \boxed{5.41} .

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...