Teardrop

Calculus Level 4

f ( x ) = x 1 2 x . \large f(x) = \sqrt x - \tfrac12x. A teardrop-shaped solid is obtained by taking the part of the graph of f f that lies above the x x -axis and revolving it around that axis.

Calculate the volume of this solid.


The answer is 1.6755.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Arjen Vreugdenhil
Feb 16, 2016

First, we find the boundaries for the integration. The left boundary is clearly a = 0 a = 0 ; the right boundary is the other zero of the function, which is b = 4 b = 4 , because 4 1 2 4 = 2 2 = 0 \sqrt 4 - \tfrac12 \cdot 4 = 2 - 2 = 0 .

V = π a b ( f ( x ) ) 2 d x = π 0 4 ( x 1 2 x ) 2 d x = π 0 4 ( x x x + 1 4 x 2 ) d x = π [ 1 2 x 2 2 5 x 2 x + 1 12 x 3 ] 0 4 = π ( 8 64 5 + 16 3 ) = 8 π 15 1.6755 . V = \pi \int_a^b \left(f(x)\right)^2\:dx \\ = \pi\int_0^4 \left(\sqrt x - \tfrac12x\right)^2\:dx \\ = \pi\int_0^4 (x - x\sqrt x + \tfrac14x^2)\:dx \\ = \pi\left[\frac12x^2 - \frac25x^2\sqrt x + \frac1{12}x^3\right]_0^4 \\ = \pi\left(8 - \frac{64}5 + \frac{16}3\right) \\ = \frac{8\pi}{15} \approx \boxed{1.6755}.

Or use Pappas's centroid volume theorem in which the volume is the distance the geometric centroid makes in one revolution times the area between the axis and the function being revolved.

Lance Rodewald - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

That is an interesting theorem, but does it help? Calculating the y y -coordinate of the centroid is at least as much work, because one would have to integrate f ( x ) f(x) itself as well: y = a b 1 2 ( f ( x ) ) 2 d x a b f ( x ) d x = \langle y\rangle = \frac{\int_a^b \tfrac12(f(x))^2\:dx}{\int_a^b f(x)\:dx} = \dots Finding the distance traveled by the centroid removes the factor 1 2 \tfrac12 and adds a factor π \pi ; multiplying by the area removes the denominator, and we are back to the original integral!

Arjen Vreugdenhil - 5 years, 3 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...