A uniform chain of length L = 3 m is suspended from two points P 1 and P 2 at the same level. Due to the chain's weight, its tension varies from point to point. If the tension at the endpoints of the chain is n = 7 times greater than the tension at the lowest point, find the distance d = P 1 P 2 in meters between the points of suspension P 1 and P 2 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
what is n here?
Log in to reply
n is the ratio between the tension of the end point and the lowest point, it is stated in the problem.
In the tan theta line, why that is equal to dTy over Tx?
My solution assumes knowledge of the equations and properties of a catenary curve. In general, the shape of any hanging rope is known as a catenary. You can see the equations of a catenary here , and the proof here .
Note that the tension at the lowest point is completely horizontal. Let T 0 be the magnitude of the tension at the lowest point. Since the rope is stationary, the horizontal component of tension must be fixed throughout the rope. This shows that the horizontal component of tension at the points of suspension must also be T 0 . Let λ be the mass per unit length of the catenary, and let g be the acceleration due to gravity. The vertical component of tension at the point of suspension is simply half the weight of the rope, i.e 2 λ g L . The total tension on the points of suspension is given by: T = T 0 2 + ( 2 λ g L ) 2 From the problem statement, we have T = n × T 0 , so: n T 0 = T 0 2 + ( 2 λ g L ) 2 ⟹ n 2 T 0 2 = T 0 2 + ( 2 λ g L ) 2 ⟹ 2 λ g L = T 0 n 2 − 1 ⟹ λ g T 0 = 2 n 2 − 1 L The equation of the catenary will then be: y = ( λ g T 0 ) × cosh ( λ g T 0 x ) ⟹ y = ( 2 n 2 − 1 L ) × cosh ( 2 n 2 − 1 L x ) Let the distance between the points of suspension be d . Note that in our equation, we take the point directly 1 unit below the vertex of the catenary as the origin. The length of the catenary from x = 0 to x = ± 2 d is given by: L = 2 × ( λ g T 0 ) × sinh ( λ g T 0 2 d ) ⟹ L = 2 × ( 2 n 2 − 1 L ) × sinh ( 2 n 2 − 1 L 2 d ) ⟹ n 2 − 1 1 × sinh ( 2 n 2 − 1 L 2 d ) = 1 ⟹ sinh ( L d × n 2 − 1 ) = n 2 − 1 ⟹ L d × n 2 − 1 = sinh − 1 ( n 2 − 1 ) ⟹ d = n 2 − 1 sinh − 1 ( n 2 − 1 ) × L Plugging the numerical values from the question gives d ≈ 1 . 1 4 m .
Let λ be the mass per unit length and T x be the horizontal tension in the spring.
At uppermost point, T y = 2 3 λ g , T y 2 + T x 2 = 4 9 T x 2 ⇒ T x λ g = 3 8 3 = 3 8
In such a curve if we define x = 0 , y = 0 at lower most point,
d x d y = s i n h ( T x λ g x )
d l = d x 2 + d y 2 = d x 1 + ( d x d y ) 2 = 1 + s i n h 2 ( 3 8 x )
∫ 0 2 d 1 + s i n h 2 ( 3 8 x ) d x = 2 3
Solve to get d = 2 3 l o g ( 2 + 3 ) = 1 . 1 4 m
Oh man, I got 8 3 instead of 8 / 3 . >:(
Anyways, nice solution Jatin! I did exactly same but looks like I messed up somewhere. :)
Also, you should write \sinh instead of simply sinh, it makes the solutions look neater. For example: sin and s i n
can this be done without using hyperbolic functions
Log in to reply
In certain limits yes, one doesn't need hyperbolic function to do the classic "hanging chain" problems. Can anyone give those limits?
I will, however, say that you use hyperbolic functions quite a bit in relativity, so they are one of those functions you should familiarize yourself with.
Log in to reply
This depends on the problem itself. If the mass of the hanging chain is not proportional to its length, then, the result is not a hyperbolic function. It is a parabola instead.
We have: T cos θ = T 0 cos θ = 7 1 θ ≈ 1 . 4 2 7 4
We also have the famous result:
s = a tan θ = a sinh a x
∴ a = tan 1 . 4 2 7 4 1 . 5 ≈ 0 . 2 1 6 5
Thus,
tan θ = sinh 0 . 2 1 6 5 x
Solve for x,
x ≈ 0 . 5 7 0 3
But this is only half the width. Hence, the result is 1.14 m
I like the simplicity of your solution compared to the others!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Consider a very small part of the chain with length d l and mass d m = L M d l as in this image:
image
We know that T x do not change along the chain and d T y = g d m . Therefore, at the end points, T y 0 = 2 M g .
Since n = T x T x 2 + T y 0 2 , so T x = n 2 − 1 T y 0 = 2 n 2 − 1 M g
We have tan θ = T x T y , so cos 2 θ d θ = T x d T y = L T x g M d l .
cos θ d θ = L T x g M d l cos θ = L T x g M d x .
0 ∫ θ 0 cos θ d θ = 0 ∫ 2 d L T x g M d x .
l n ( tan θ 0 + cos θ 0 1 ) = 2 L T x g M d
(with cos θ 0 = T 0 T x = n 1 )
d = g M 2 L T x l n ( tan θ 0 + cos θ 0 1 ) = n 2 − 1 l n ( n 2 − 1 + n ) L = 1 . 1 4 ( m ) .