This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I would rather choose to do it by dividing numerator and denominator with 44x and applying standard limits..:)
oh that was easy
by using L hospital rule we get ans as 1/2 isnt it
Would somebody explain to me why I get 44xe^(44x - 1) when I differentiate e^(44x) - 1 with the chain rule (ax^n -> anx^n-1), and not 44e^(44x)? Thanks :(
Is clear that the expression can be rewritten as x 2 + 2 x e 4 4 x − 1 = 4 4 x e 4 4 x − 1 ⋅ x 2 + 2 x 4 4 x so by the fundamental limit t → 0 lim t e t − 1 = 1 we have 4 4 x e 4 4 x − 1 ⋅ x 2 + 2 x 4 4 x = 4 4 x e 4 4 x − 1 ⋅ x + 2 4 4 → 1 ⋅ 2 4 4 = 2 2
Clever
This is a 0 0 form, so it is of an indeterminate form. So we use L'Hôpital's rule: x → 0 lim ( x 2 + 2 x e 4 4 x − 1 ) = x → 0 lim ( 2 x + 2 4 4 e 4 4 x ) = x → 0 lim ( x + 1 2 2 e 4 4 x ) = 0 + 1 2 2 ⋅ e 0 = 2 2 .
at first if you put x = 0 in the expression you get 0 0 form, then applying l'hopital's rule i.e. differentiatiating the numerator and denominator we get 2 x + 2 4 4 e 4 4 x , then put x=0 and you'll get 2 4 4 i.e 22.
use L Hopitals rule just take derivative on numerator and denominator seperately and then apply limit remember donot use qoutient rule besta luck
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Since directly substituting x = 0 into the expression gives us 0 2 + 2 ( 0 ) e 4 4 ( 0 ) − 1 = 0 0 , we can use L'Hopital's rule and differentiate the numerator and the denominator of the fraction.
lim x → 0 x 2 + 2 x e 4 4 x − 1 = lim x → 0 2 x + 2 4 4 e 4 4 x = 2 ( 0 ) + 2 4 4 e 0 = 2 4 4 = 2 2