S 1 S 2 I = = = 2 2 1 8 8 7 + 2 2 1 8 8 8 + ⋯ + 2 2 2 0 1 3 + 2 2 2 0 1 4 2 2 1 8 8 8 + 2 2 1 8 8 9 + ⋯ + 2 2 2 0 1 4 + 2 2 2 0 1 5 ∫ 1 8 8 7 2 0 1 5 2 2 x d x
What can you say about the relative values of S 1 , S 2 , and I ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Yes, this is essentially Trapezoidal Rule. Bonus question: What would the answer be if all the numbers 2 2 in S 1 , S 2 , I are replaced by its additive inverse, − 2 2 ?
Answering the Challenge Master's Bonus Question:
Given f ( x ) = x − 2 2 1
Here, f ( x ) is a decreasing function. So, S 2 < I < S 1 .
I know two infinitys alichnol and omega and then ?????? which stands for unknown infinity.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
For any function f ( x ) that is positive, increasing & integrable in the interval [ a , b ] , where a and b are integers such that a < b , let us consider the quantities
S 1 = a ∑ b − 1 f ( x ) , S 2 = a + 1 ∑ b f ( x ) and I = ∫ a b f ( x ) d x
The integral I is the area under the curve y = f ( x ) in the interval [ a , b ] as shown in Fig. 1 below.
The sum S 1 is the numerical approximation of the integral I using rectangular strips of unit width as shown in Fig. 2 below.
The sum S 2 is the numerical approximation of the integral I using rectangular strips of unit width as shown in Fig. 3 below.
Clearly, S 1 < I < S 2 .
In this question, f ( x ) = 2 2 x , a = 1 8 8 7 and b = 2 0 1 5 .