One morning after church, the vicar asked the bishop, "How old are those three worshippers?"
"Well," replied the bishop, "the product of their ages is 2 4 5 0 and the sum is twice your age."
"I'm afraid I still don't know," said the vicar.
"Ah, I am older than each of them! You should be able to figure out their ages now," cried the bishop.
Sadly, the vicar was still at a loss. How old is the bishop?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
I object, if the vicar doesn't have a firm grasp of maths, why would he then (and instantaneously at that!!) realise that there is more than 1 possibility. No, this is highly incredible and therefore this question should have been disallowed.
Log in to reply
Yes, I totally agree with this statement at first. Something has to be clarified by problemsetter (e.g Vicar actually knew the answer but didn't tell us, so we have to find it out by ourselves).
Actually, the vicar never had a clue of what was going on, it was the bishop's last sentence that implied the need for that new information, specially when he says the vicar should now be able to solve the problem.
SHOULD, as a person who excels in math would, yet he didn't, but then, the answer is based on the clues given by the bishop, the vicar is merely a meaningless observer.
The vicar doesn't have a firm grasp of maths, but the bishop has. That's why when the vicar said that he did not know, the bishop knew that he would not know it at first. Hence, the bishop gave another clue, and he knew right then and there that the vicar should be able to find it out.
Log in to reply
Yes, your line of thinking leads to the "correct" answer, but the wording of that particular section of the problem, "Sadly, the Vicar was still at a loss, as he didn't have a firm grasp of mathematics," is the most problematic that I have ever come across, and most likely the most problematic I will come across this year.
The correct answer hinges on the fact that the vicar would know the ages of the worshipers after everything in the problem before the above statement, nothing more and nothing less. That hinge is destroyed when the vicar is stated to have no firm grasp of mathematics.
It is unreasonable to believe that the vicar could lose his mathematical ability during the conversation, so we can assume that he had the same lack of ability in the beginning and middle of the conversation. Now, my point is that the vicar could not figure out the ages of the worshipers at paragraph #3 or #5 because his lack of ability.
For those of you who point out the "You SHOULD be able to figure out their ages now." line, assuming that the bishop is a person who has emotion and is not infinitely patient, the bishop most likely did not mean this above line in the sense that "Ah, I am older than each of them!" is the decisive piece of information. He would most likely have meant it in exasperation or impatience, because the vicar has little mathematical knowledge, and cannot figure out the ages of the worshipers. Also, it is detailed that the bishop "cried" the above lines, which is further evidence that the bishop was showing emotion in said Paragraph #4.
TL;DR: It all depends on the attitude of the bishop as he said "You should be able to figure out their ages now." With all the evidence in the problem, It is quite reasonable that the bishop was being emotional.
The vicar doesn't have a firm grasp of maths, but the bishop has. That's why when the vicar said that he did not know, the bishop knew that he would not know it at first. Hence, the bishop gave another clue, and he knew right then and there that the vicar should be able to find it out.
If the bishop had a firm grasp of math, he would not have opened with his first statement since it gave no definitive answer to the original question about ages. Therefore, it logically follows that he did not know the first answer was insufficient.
The vicar was confused by both statements and described as a poor mathematician. His actions in this problem provide no insight to the assumptions made. The only clues we can rely on are the actions of the bishops. Due to the poor wording, they are ambiguous and do not connect logically.
Maybe something like...
One morning after church, the vicar asked the bishop "How old are those three worshippers?"
"Well," replied the bishop, "the product of their ages is 2450 and the sum is twice your age."
"That isn't enough to figure it out!" Cried the Vicar.
"Ah, I am older than each of them! You should be able to figure out their ages now." said the bishop.
How old is the bishop?
First this problem is ill-defined, as there are many possible solutions. For example, {5,5,98} is a valid solution (vicar is 54), as is {5,14,35} (vicar is 27). Second, any valid solution only give a lower bound to the bishop's age. So in the first example, the bishop might be 99 or 100, in the second the bishop might be 36 or 92. BTW, I got the supposed "correct" answer in 1 try, by guessing at the intention of the question.
Log in to reply
actually that is not true: for {5,5,98} the vicar would have got the answer with only the first clue. Using prime factorization of 2450, you can get all the possible ages. You will find that only the sum of possible sets are the same and thus create ambiguity thus the vicar couldn't guess the answer even he for sure knows his own age. the two sets that create the ambiguity are {50,7,7} and {5,10,49} summing to 64 this leads to 3 possibilities: the bishop is younger than 50: neither sets would work with this assumption. the bishop is older than 50: that wouldn't solve the ambiguity but the bishop knew that by giving this clue, the vicar should be able to solve it thus that leads us to the third possibility
were the bishop is 50
however, I agree with you that the wording of the problem is terrible
5 Years old and working in the church? That was what prevented me from proceeding in the question. I assumed that the minimum age of anyone involved is 18.........
Log in to reply
math knows no boundaries
Log in to reply
its funny cus just the other day i was solving a boundary-value problem =P
Well the cube root of 2450 is less than 14, so one person's age must be less than 14
They weren't workers, they were worshippers.
Why Vicar can't be 24, 26, 41, 36, 38, 50 or 53( {1,35,70}, {1,49,50}, {2,25,49}, {2,35,35},{5,7,70}, {5,10,49}, {5,14,35}, {7,7,50}, {7,10,35} all satisfy, if we allow very old bishop and very old worshipper, then {5,5,98} and {1,25,98} also satisfy - you see, one of them is 25, why can't it be a mother with one-year-old baby, i know, tha probability is low, but not zero)? Why do he HAS TO be 32? Sorry, but there are not only two solutions.
Log in to reply
i totally agree with your comment
I recommend the movie Fermat's Room for there is a problem similar to this one.
Here's JAVA code
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 |
|
i didn't use any mathematical solution in this problem but still arrived at the correct answer.
First of all there is No specific Conditions provided in this problem Every once can assume their own solution here and Secondly the age of eldest person only sets a Minimum constraint So even in the case described the answer can be any integer >49.
From the way the problem is defined There is only one thing clear and that is sum of three ages is even. and even That seems to apply for all the solutions of equation 'xyz=2450' if the question is what is the possible minimum age of bishop then there is a solution which is 26.
the solution is correct, ryt, math has no boundaries to solve, it was only constrained about number values but not constrained on truth situation, that is why sometimes we assume on a values just to solve the problem in a mathematical way of thinking not to mention that it was true or not. Anywayz they do not mention the required age to worship God...
Hi Ammar Fathin Sabili,
I agree with you that vicar can think of only had 2 possibility which are (5,10,49) and (7,7,50). When bishop gave the second clue- ( "Ah, I am older than each of them! You should be able to figure out their ages now." cried the bishop.) , It means the bishop is very sure that there is only one correct answer. The whole idea of this question is Bishop calculated and found that there is only one solution and We have to understand by correlating the Bishop's Statement and vicar's numerical ability..
This question is more of logical reasoning type and not related to Level 4 math
good one
Why can't it be 7, 14, 25
Log in to reply
Lets look at the the problem from the vicars perspective.
His point of view if the vicar was 23: Okay so I'm 23 Y.O. Their ages added together would be 46. Oh there's only 1 combination of numbers which satisfy this. I know that they are 7, 14 and 25.
In this case: I am 32 Y.O. Their ages added together would be 46. Oh there's 2 combinations. 5,10,49 and 7,7,50 He tells me he is older than the 3 people. This is enough information to figure out the combination. IF the bishop was 51 Y.O or higher, the vicar wouldn't be able to figure out the solution because there would still be too solution. So if the vicar was bishop was 50 then there would only be one solution.
Hopefully that answers your question in a more obvious way.
y can't it be 35,35,2 and the vicar age be 36, the bishop be 36?
I really feel the question is not complete. I don't understand why the other options are neglected. Here Only (7, 7, 50) and (5, 10, 49) are considered, can any tell me why???
why cant the ages of 3 worshippers be 70 , 7 and 5
whats the conditions considered by you.explain in detail??
Log in to reply
On the 4th paragraph : The condition is there have to be more than one possibility of x , y , z . From all 2 0 sets, all of them have different sum x + y + z except two : ( 5 , 1 0 , 4 9 ) and ( 7 , 7 , 5 0 ) which are the sum is 6 4 . Hence, only when x + y + z = 6 4 there are more than one possibility of x , y , z .
On the 5th paragraph : The condition is Bishop is older than the three ages . Remember that domains of valid set of x , y , z are only ( 5 , 1 0 , 4 9 ) and ( 7 , 7 , 5 0 ) .
On the 6th paragraph : The conditions are all in the story. Whereas Vicar have to be known the exact value of x , y , z . Sadly (or oddly), he couldn't get it.
Log in to reply
what about the condition that the sum of their ages is twice of his age?
The least ages are 2, 25 and 49 and the Bishop should be 50 to satisfy the above conditions. I doubt if this is the only solution though! (5,5,98) is another solution where the Bishop's age can be 99...that holds good for a healthy and old person...the Vicar can be 54 then...all sounds realistic I guess
The set should have been 1 , 2 , 1 2 2 5 where we would have a bishop older than 1 2 2 5 years old.
I don't think that the answer is correct. Why can't 25,7,14 be a solution? Just because the vicar was not able to guess the answer when the first hint was given how can we conclude the the correct solution would be one of the two sets whose totals match?
i think it's ambiguity question why it' not possible ages of worshippers are 7,14,25 and bishop age is 26
where is the vicars age given
EXACTLY the Same process!!!
you could have used prime factorization of 2450 that would have given you only 12 possible sets of ages and saved some calculations :)
why 50 and not 51? for example
but sum of their ages 7,7,5 or 5,10,49 is not twice of his age!!!
Why are you getting so few answers? How do you know ? If I run this with a small script in Python I get a lot of permutations that gives a lot of "sums" that result in common numbers. What's the rule to have the exact number of permutations?
Why not the set (1, 35, 70) ? The bishop can be greater than 70. And Vicar can be of age 53. The question has many possibilities. I don't think it should be put up or if put up there should be some more data to calculate.
My objection is way simpler than yours Cees. In the text the bishop states that he is older than each of them. The point is: how much older? If 50 is an answer, so is 51, and 52, and so forth.
Log in to reply
ok befor the bishop sead that he was older then the every one over the worshippers the vicar did not know the ages becoues there were 2 deiffrint options after he sead the secound clue that made it one i get it now
What is wrong if I say age is 25,14,7...and bishop then anything greater than 25
Y it is not 7,7,50
This question doesn't have enough data. The "solution" is simply gibberish! How the hell can this "question" not be removed?
(1+tanA)(1+tanB)=2.prove,if a+b=2
why not the answer is 55 (5,14,35) 5+14+35=54 so v=27 and B = 55 i think if he want minimum age of bishop then the question is more appropriate.
minimun age for worshipper is 5 ,its unbeleiveable .this question is not making a sense .please dont allow such question .as per Islamic point of view .minimum age for worshipper is 7 as a standard one .this can make a sense if it is considered
Log in to reply
Hmm.. quite agree but actually it's no problem I think. Well, I'm moslem and I started to worship in Mosque since I was 5 with my parents (when I was in kindergarten) , :)
In order for the vicar to not know the answer for the first time, there should be at least two distinct (a,b,c) combinations that sum up to the same number. If every combination is worked out, one can see such two sets:
(50, 7, 7) and (49, 10, 5) sets both have 2450 as their multiplication and 64 as their summation.
Since the bishop gave additional information to distinguish this set, we know that he's older than 49 and not older than 50. Therefore, bishop is 50
the question gave too much information. it should have not stated the vicar do not have a firm grasp of mathematics.
Let x,y,z be age of worshipers and v and b age of vicar and bishop respectively. Assume vicar knows his age :)
Vicar should be able to figure out the age unless there are two sets of solutions for x+y+z = 2v and xyz=2450. Enumerate all the possible solutions of xyz=250 and find out if there are multiple sets of solutions which results in same value for x+y+z.
Here we found (50,7,7) and (10,5,49) which adds up to 64. This is what confused the vicar so he needed a second clue. The second clue would help if the pope's age is 50.
NB: You need to enumerate the entire set of solutions for xyz=50 since the last clue of bishop helped reach a definite answer. So the max age of the worshiper should be consecutive number.
I mean't you dont need to enumerate the entire set of solutions for xyz-2450.
Sadly brilliant.org dont provide and option to edit your response once you submit :(
Perfect !!! same concept I used ...
simple : xyz= 2450 , and x+y+z is twice the vicar's age , now 2450=[5x5x7x7x2] , ideally if we start grouping [since there are more variables] its like 30 permutations, but it reduces 3 trial and error steps, first group is 5x49x10 then 10x14x35 then 49x25x2 , now the bishop is elder than all the three so he must be atleast 50 , so answer is 50.
ok so , let's say that the three worshipers are a b c . And if we look at 2450 we obviously know that 50 goes in to 2450 . So I did 2450 / 50 = 49 . so I now knew that 49 x b x c = 2450 . so the b x c must make 50 . b = 5 and c = 10 . so now we know the age of the worshipers are 49 , 10 , 5 . Since 49 is the largest number . The number after 49 is 50 . So the bishop can be 50 or up . But guessing that he's the youngest possible so this makes him 50
The bishop is older than 49.
50 is not the only answer.
Factor of 2450 is 2 5 5 7 7, now let us consider the maximum case so the age of one person is 7 7=49, the second person age is 5 5=25 or 5*2=10 and third one is 2 or 5.
what if the set of ages is (50,7,7)?.......here the maximum case would be 50,so the age could be 51 too!......(confused)!!
The reasonable age combinations :
Ages Sum
7 14 25 2450 46 49 10 5 2450 64 7 7 50 2450 64 35 35 2 2450 72 49 2 25 2450 76 7 70 5 2450 82 49 50 1 2450 100 35 70 1 2450 106 98 5 5 2450 108 98 25 1 2450 124
The fact that the vicar was initially stumped (inspite of knowing his own age) shows that there are at least 2 combinations yielding the same sum , that is 64 , i.e 49, 10 and 5 and 7,7 and 50. The bishop's statement that he is older than each of them shows that 49, 10 and 5 is the right answer since each would imply that their ages are unique. So the bishop's age being 50 is the minimal age (Bishops too are human in that they may not want to grow too old!!! :-) ) that is required to fulfil conditions as well as provide a kind of red herring for those proceeding purely verbally
Let's call the ages of the worshippers a,b,c
Let's call the Vicar's age V
From the given clues we know the following:
abc = 2 x 5 x 5 x 7 x 7 = 2450
a + b + c = 2V
So, a+b+c must be even
There's only one factor of two in the prime decomposition of 2450. It follows that only one of the three worshippers will have an even age, the other two will be odds. Keeping this constraint in mind we can write down all the possible different a+b+c values
2+25+49 = 76
10+5+49 = 64
50+7+7 = 64
2+35+35 = 72
10+7+35 = 52
98+5+5 = 108
2+175+7 = 184
14+25+7 = 46
70+5+7 = 82
2+245+5 = 252
14+35+5 = 54
Let's assume that the Vicar knows his age: in order for the vicar to not know the answer there should be at least two distinct (a,b,c) combinations that sum up to the same number and these are
10+5+49 = 64
50+7+7 = 64
At this point we use the same "trick" (and assume the Bishop knows his own age, just as a reminder let's call it B). If B were any value greater than 50 then the Bishop couldn't have cried "You should be able to figure out their ages now" because both of the two cases would have been acceptable. So, we just showed that B is less or equal (not greater) than 50. But just looking at the two possible cases we know that B is greater than 49, leaving B = 50 as the only option.
Call it beginner's luck, but I just multiplied 49*5 to get 245 and assumed that the third worshiper was 10 and the others were 49 and 5 years old respectively. Then, I just arbitrarily added one year to the oldest worshiper and scored the correct answer. Rather bizarre to me.
After looking at other solutions to this problem, I found that I interpreted the problem differently and still arrived at the same solution. I assumed that this was a trick question, and the vicar and bishop (and one other person) were observing their receding reflections in a mirror or other reflective surface. In that case:
bishop's age = b
vicar's age = v
third person's age = x
2 b + v + x = v
and
b × v × x = 2 5 4 0
and
b > "each of them", referring to the vicar and the third person
Prime factorize 2540, and you get 1,2,5,5,7,7. The only possibility that works is 1,49,50 .
afraid!!!! absolutely incorrect solution
Log in to reply
Well, incorrect only in the sense that this was not the intended solution of the problem writers. In its initial wording (since changed), my assumptions were no less valid than the assumptions they intend you to make (i.e. vicar is smart enough to prime factorize and determine all possible solution sets, but too dumb to take the final, easy step after the bishop gives him the final clue).
1 year old and working in the church?
Log in to reply
This problem cannot be taken as an algebraic one
well its nowhere mentioned in the question that the given three people work in the church....
Log in to reply
the problem originally said they were all "clergy" before being reworded. I worked under the assumption that it was a silly numbers game, with little bearing on reality.
Lol! :p Good that they are asking just the age of the bishop. By looking at the things that bishop has said, I guess we could have guessed the age of his mother too! :p
vicar will be confused when he will find two or more sets of ages which have equal summation {(5,10,49) and (7,7,50)} otherwise he can solve the question with two clues only.
They changed the wording of the problem since I posted this solution- the original problem stated that the vicar and bishop were watching 3 people "walking away" from the church.
this question in no way appeals to any branch of maths........
Log in to reply
On the contrary, i think that this goes to the very core of mathematical thought in all of higher mathematics (proof, mathematical logic, recursive processes etc) where information about non uniqueness itself is used to derive a solution
Log in to reply
This is not a good question at all, and the answer of 50 above falls apart. Assume that the bishop knows that the vicar couldn't break down the ages because of the fact that there is only one sum that has 2 or more solution.. therefore we have {5,10,49} & {7,7,50}. He then says.. I'm older than each! Well, then to answer the question, the bishop can be 51 years old and up! This range covers both x,y,z combinations. We have no further determination that one combination supersedes the other! The answer is either incorrect (since it makes many assumptions), or if 50 is the answer they want, they must make the problem more concise!
There is also 2, 25 and 49 for you
Log in to reply
doesn't work with the equation i outlined: (b+v+x) / 2 = v
Log in to reply
In your equation, you considered bishop, vicar and the other person as three worshipers. As per the problem, there are three worshipers who are different from bishop and vicar...
why is that the only possibility?? even 35,35, 2 works.... and that will make the bishop 36 years old..... because according to your only possibility the bishop is not older than the 50 years old worshipper, which is violating the last hint.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Let the three departing clergymen's ages are x , y , and z satisying 1 ≤ x ≤ y ≤ z (because the permutation of the ages is not important).
There are 2 0 integer solutions of the set of x , y , and z (I used WolframAlpha here) : { 1 , 1 , 2 4 5 0 } , { 1 , 2 , 1 2 2 5 } , { 1 , 5 , 4 9 0 } , { 1 , 7 , 3 5 0 } , { 1 , 1 0 , 2 4 5 } , { 1 , 1 4 , 1 7 5 } , { 1 , 2 5 , 9 8 } , { 1 , 3 5 , 7 0 } , { 1 , 4 9 , 5 0 } , { 2 , 5 , 2 4 5 } , { 2 , 7 , 1 7 5 } , { 2 , 2 5 , 4 9 } , { 2 , 3 5 , 3 5 } , { 5 , 5 , 9 8 } , { 5 , 7 , 7 0 } , { 5 , 1 0 , 4 9 } , { 5 , 1 4 , 3 5 } , { 7 , 7 , 5 0 } , { 7 , 1 0 , 3 5 } , and { 7 , 1 4 , 2 5 } .
Take a look that x + y + z is twice of the vicar's age. The vicar (of course) knows his age so he knows the exact value of x + y + z . Note that in here, the vicar hadn't known the values of x , y , and z . It proves that there are more than one possibility of x , y , and z .
Luckily, there is exactly only one pair of set of x , y , and z satisfy the conditions : { 5 , 1 0 , 4 9 } and { 7 , 7 , 5 0 } . The sum of them is 6 4 which means the age of the vicar is 3 2 .
Next, the bishop said that he was older than the three ages . There are 3 cases of bishop's age p :
In here, bishop had given all the conditions to get the exact values of x , y , and z . It has to be only one possibility of their values. Therefore, the value of p must be 5 0 so the values of x , y , and z are 5 , 1 0 , and 4 9 .
The answer of this question is the value of p = 5 0 .