k = 0 ∑ ∞ 2 2 k + 1 2 k + 1
The sum above equals to n m , where m and n are coprime positive integers. Compute m + n .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Super-Awesome, Calculus-Free approach.......Thanks!
Very nice. I did something quite similar.
S = 10/9 not 10/19
Let us consider the sum:
x + x 3 + x 5 + x 7 + . . . uptill infinite terms where ∣ x ∣ < 1
By the formula for the sum of the terms of an infinite Geometric Progression the above sum can be written as:
n = 0 ∑ ∞ x 2 n + 1 = 1 − x 2 x
Now differentiating w.r.t. x we get:
n = 0 ∑ ∞ ( 2 n + 1 ) x 2 n = ( 1 − x 2 ) 2 1 + x 2
Now substitute x = 2 1 to obtain:
n = 0 ∑ ∞ 2 2 n 2 n + 1 = 9 2 0
Thus the required answer is 2 1 n = 0 ∑ ∞ 2 2 n 2 n + 1 = 9 1 0
How do you make your solution look so neat? Mine has a very small font and the summation limits are to the side.
Log in to reply
Just use \displaystyle before what you want to type and it becomes bigger. For example, by using the following code:\displaystyle\frac{10}{9} we get:
9 1 0
instead of
9 1 0
The same if used for summations and integrals makes them look a lot better.For example, by using the following code:\displaystyle\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} we get:
n = 0 ∑ ∞
instead of
∑ n = 0 ∞
You may also refer this useful post .
Hope that helps : )
Very informative. Thanks for taking your time to answer me.
M y s o l u t i o n i s s o m e w h a t d i f f e r e n t . C o n s i d e r 2 n + 1 = d x d x 2 n + 1 ∣ x = 1 , t h u s ∑ n = 0 ∞ 2 2 n + 1 2 n + 1 = ∑ n = 0 ∞ d x d 2 2 n + 1 x 2 n + 1 ∣ x = 1 = d x d ∑ n = 0 ∞ ( 4 x 2 ) n 2 x ∣ x = 1 = d x d 1 − 4 x 2 2 x ∣ x = 1 = ( 4 − x 2 ) 2 8 + 2 x 2 ∣ x = 1 = 9 1 0 .
For a better format, use \text{\[LaTeX code }\) or \text{\(\displaystyle LaTeX code }).
Well technically speaking, is diferentiation of each term of a series = differentiation of the whole series? If its true, is any other condition required ?
Log in to reply
Technically, it is the addition rule applied infinitely many times.
Thank you, Valentina.
Piyal, Yes, differentiation is a linear operator, and the series is defined as long as -2<x<2.
Here is a non-calculus and heavy summation notation approach: Note that 2 2 1 = 2 2 1 2 4 2 = 2 4 1 + 2 4 1 2 6 3 = 2 6 1 + 2 6 1 + 2 6 1 ⋮ = ⋯
Hence we can "sum vertically" to see that n = 1 ∑ ∞ 2 2 n n = n = 1 ∑ ∞ ( i = n ∑ ∞ 2 2 i 1 ) = n = 1 ∑ ∞ 2 − 2 n ( i = 0 ∑ ∞ 2 2 i 1 ) = n = 1 ∑ ∞ 2 − 2 n 1 − 1 / 4 1 = 3 4 n = 1 ∑ ∞ 2 − 2 n = 3 4 ⋅ 4 1 ⋅ 3 4 = 9 4 .
Therefore
n = 0 ∑ ∞ 2 2 n + 1 2 n + 1 = n = 1 ∑ ∞ 2 2 n n + n = 0 ∑ ∞ 2 2 n + 1 1 = 9 4 + 2 1 ⋅ 3 4 = 9 1 0
Hence m / m = 1 0 / 9 and m + n = 1 0 + 9 = 1 9 .
(NB: This method is not recommended, unless you are running out of time in the exam and wants to get the 1 mark for the answer mark, or if this is a fill-in-the-blank)
Let S ( N ) be n = 0 ∑ N 2 2 n + 1 2 n + 1 .
S(1)=0.5
S(2)=0.875
S(3)=1.03125
S(4)=1.0859375
S(5)=1.103515625
S(6)=1.10888671875
S(7)=1.11047363281
Enough evidence to know that it approaches to 1.111111... = 10/9
For ∣ x ∣ < 1 ,
k = 0 ∑ ∞ x 2 k + 1 k = 0 ∑ ∞ ( 2 k + 1 ) x 2 k k = 0 ∑ ∞ ( 2 k + 1 ) x 2 k + 1 k = 0 ∑ ∞ 2 2 k + 1 2 k + 1 = 1 − x 2 x = ( 1 − x 2 ) 2 1 + x 2 = ( 1 − x 2 ) 2 x ( 1 + x 2 ) = ( 1 − 4 1 ) 2 2 1 ( 1 + 4 1 ) = 9 1 0 Differentiate both sides w.r.t. x Multiply both sides by x Putting x = 2 1
Therefore, m + n = 1 0 + 9 = 1 9 .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
I hope that you will find my solution very easy.
Let ∑ n = 0 ∞ 2 2 n + 1 2 n + 1 = S
Therefore, S = 2 1 + 2 3 3 + 2 5 5 + 2 7 7 + 2 9 9 . . . . . . ∞
Then, S/4 = 2 3 1 + 2 5 3 + 2 7 5 + 2 9 7 . . . . . . ∞
Subtract S/4 from S
S- S/4 = 2 1 + 2 3 2 + 2 5 2 + 2 7 2 + 2 9 2 . . . . . . ∞
Now, we have an infinite geometric series with a = 1/4 and r = 1/4
Hence,
3S/4 = 2 1 + 1 − 4 1 4 1
3S/4 = 2 1 + 3 1
So, S = 10/19 and therefore the answer 1 9