The Frozen Lake

A group of scientists is given the job to determine the thickness of ice in a frozen lake. Ice being a good insulator of heat, one can find liquid water below a certain depth from the surface. However, the scientists don't have a meter-tape that is long enough to reach the water level, neither can they use a submarine to pierce through the ice. All they are given is a laser-pointer and a highly accurate timer.

Let's assume the ice in the lake is a transparent material, whose refractive index varies as a linear function of the depth. It is known that the refractive index at the surface is μ 1 = 1.5 \mu_1= 1.5 , and that at the lowest ice layer is μ 2 = 3 \mu_2= 3 .

The scientists project a laser beam perpendicular to the surface and start their timer. The beam travels through the ice, hits the water, and reflects back. The scientists turn their timer off as soon as they see the laser beam return. It turns out that the time recorded on the timer is T = 5 × 1 0 6 seconds T= 5 \times 10^{-6} \text{ seconds} . What is the thickness h h of the ice in meters, rounded to the nearest integer?

Details and assumptions

  • Note that this experiment cannot be done in real life, as ice is an opaque material and water isn't a good reflector of light.
  • The speed of light in vaccum is c = 299 , 792 , 458 m/s c= 299, \ 792, \ 458 \text{ m/s} .
  • If h h in meters is of the form k + 0.5 k+0.5 for some integer k k , enter k + 1 k+1 as your answer.
  • The refractive index of ice varies as a linear function of depth simply means the refractive index at depth d d below the surface is given by μ d = f ( d ) \mu_d= f(d) , where f f is a linear polynomial.
  • Reflex errors of the scientists are to be neglected.
Image credit: Ariel Bravy


The answer is 333.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

4 solutions

Discussions for this problem are now closed

Anish Puthuraya
Jan 21, 2014

Since the Refractive Index is a linear function of distance,
If x x represents a general depth inside the ice,
Then, by functional analysis, we have,

μ = 1.5 ( 1 + x h ) \mu = 1.5\left(1+\frac{x}{h}\right)

Now, By the real definition of Refractive Index, we know,

Speed of Light in a Medium ( v v ) = c μ = \frac{c}{\mu} , where c c is the speed of light in vacuum .

Therefore,
v = d x d t = 2 c 3 h h + x v = \frac{dx}{dt} = \frac{2c}{3} \frac{h}{h+x}

Rearranging,
( h + x ) d x = 2 c h 3 d t \left(h+x\right) dx = \frac{2ch}{3} dt

Integrating both sides,
0 h ( h + x ) d x = 0 t 2 c h 3 d t \int_0^h \left(h+x\right) dx = \int_0^t \frac{2ch}{3} dt

Note that t t here, is only half the time. So, we will have to double it once we are finished.

3 h 2 2 = 2 c h 3 t \frac{3h^2}{2} = \frac{2ch}{3} t

t = 9 h 4 c \Rightarrow t = \frac{9h}{4c}

Doubling t t ,
T = 2 t = 9 h 2 c = 5 × 1 0 6 \Rightarrow T = 2t = \frac{9h}{2c} = 5\times 10^{-6} sec (as given)

Simplifying, and using the values given,
h = 333.1 333 m h = 333.1 \approx \boxed{333m}

Nice solution! My approach is a bit different though. It follows directly from Fermat's principle that the time taken for the light beam to reach the water ( = T 2 ) \left( = \dfrac{T}{2} \right) equals 1 c 0 h μ x d x . \dfrac{1}{c} \int \limits_{0}^{h} \mu_x dx.

Sreejato Bhattacharya - 7 years, 4 months ago

sir can you plz explian fermat's rule

soyu matthew - 7 years, 4 months ago

In short form, it states that,
If a light beam has to travel from a point A \displaystyle A to a point B \displaystyle B , then it will do so such that it takes the least amount of time.

Anish Puthuraya - 7 years, 4 months ago

Another possibility seems to be treat the change in refractive index (and hence velocity) with depth similar to the constant of acceleration (g or a) in the basic equations of motion , v = u + a t (v being c/3) and u being (c/1.5) and t being the total time (or rather half of the total return time). Then we go on to find the total height as h=s(total distance) = u t + 1/2 a t^2

Sundar R - 7 years, 4 months ago

That is, indirectly, the same process that is shown above. It is just another way to think about that process. You have suggested to apply equations of motion, I have done just that.

The only flaw in your suggestion seems to be that, you have assumed the acceleration to be constant , where in fact, it is not constant.

Anish Puthuraya - 7 years, 4 months ago
Akash Chandak
Jan 29, 2014

Since refractive index is linearly varying so we can find out mid point ((1.5+3)/2)and assume to be constant over height "h". Since we are observing the ray after 2T time where T denotes total time required before 2nd reflection rest is simple distance-speed calculation

best answer till now

Komal Sai - 7 years, 3 months ago

the thinking was to easy to think... thats why... we could not... -_- :(

Muhammad Ali - 7 years, 2 months ago

T = 5.1 0 6 s T = 5. 10^{-6} s
t 1 + t 2 = 5.1 0 6 t_{1} + t_{2} = 5. 10^{-6}
h / v 1 + h / v 2 = 5.1 0 6 h/v_{1} + h/v_{2} = 5. 10^{-6}
h ( 1 / v 1 + 1 / v 2 ) = 5.1 0 6 h(1/v_{1} + 1/v_{2}) = 5. 10^{-6}
h ( µ 1 / c + µ 2 / c ) = 5.1 0 6 h(µ_{1}/c + µ_{2}/c) = 5. 10^{-6}
h ( µ 1 + µ 2 ) = 5.1 0 6 . c h(µ_{1} + µ_{2}) = 5. 10^{-6}.c
h ( 1.5 + 3 ) = 5.1 0 6 . c h(1.5 + 3) = 5. 10^{-6}.c
h = 5.1 0 6 . 2.99792458.1 0 8 / 4.5 h = 5. 10^{-6}. 2.99792458 . 10^{8} / 4.5
= 3.33.1 0 2 m = 3.33 . 10^{2} m
= 333.33 m = 333.33 m

just read the 4th assumption + the 1st.

Amiruddin Zulfikar - 7 years, 4 months ago

If the laser beam is projected perpendicularly how does it undergo refraction?

Akash Mukherjee - 7 years, 4 months ago

It does not refract......who said it does?

Arkadeb Sengupta - 7 years, 4 months ago

yeah sorry I misunderstood the problem

Akash Mukherjee - 7 years, 4 months ago

As R.I of ice is changing linearly , we can take its R.I as mean of 1.5 and 3 .i.e R.I=2.25. Therefore speed of light in ice is 1.33*10^2 m/s. Thus thickness is 332.5 .e.i=333 metres.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...