Let f be a non-constant polynomial such that f ( x − 1 ) + f ( x ) + f ( x + 1 ) = 2 0 1 3 x f ( x ) 2 for all nonzero real numbers x . Let N the sum of all possible values of f ( 1 ) . Find the remainder when N is divided by 1 0 0 0 .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Let n = d e g [ f ( x ) ] , d e g [ x f ( x ) 2 ] = 2 n − 1 right? Say f ( x ) = a n x n + a n − 1 x n − 1 + . . . + a 1 x f ( x ) = a n x n − 1 + a n − 1 x n − 2 + . . . + x a 1 where the degree of the polynomial wouldn't be n − 1 since we have a x a 1 , same for x f ( x ) 2 .
I think multiplying x to LHS before computing the degree would be a more proper approach. Where we get n + 1 = 2 n n = 1 Just a thought from me, please correct me if I'm wrong.
Log in to reply
Yes, I agree. If there is a x a 1 it is no longer a polynomial, and so it doesn't have a "degree". It would be more proper to multiply by x first, though the result is the same.
Log in to reply
Yes, usually the word "degree" is reserved for the polynomials. However, one can define the degree of a rational function as the difference of the degrees of the numerator and the denominator. This number, that can be negative, is also known as "the order of the pole at infinity". Note that if the function is zero, this is − ∞ ; for any non-zero constant function it is zero.
True story..
Let the degree of f ( x ) be a . Then a = 1 a 2 implies that a is 1 , i.e., let f ( x ) = m x + b for some m and b . Then, the left-hand side of the equation becomes m ( x − 1 ) + b + m x + b + m ( x + 1 ) + b = 3 ( m x + b ) = 3 f ( x ) . Now we substitute 1 : 3 f ( 1 ) = 2 0 1 3 f ( 1 ) 2 , which one can simplify and factor into f ( 1 ) ( f ( 1 ) − 6 0 3 9 ) = 0 , so f ( 1 ) = 0 or 6 0 3 9 . Therefore N = 0 + 6 0 3 9 = 6 0 3 9 , and the remainder when N is divided by 1 0 0 0 is 0 3 9 .
Can you explain your thinking step by step? How did you arrive at a = 1 a 2 ?
Log in to reply
Yeah. note that it is meant to be a = 2 a − 1 which has a solution of a = 1 The rest of your solution is fine but you might want to refine how you crafted the degree part of it.
Wow! Best of Algebra can make comments? WOAH!!!!!!!!
Let d = deg ( f ) . Then, the degree of the LHS is d and the degree of the RHS is 2 d − 1 , so d = 1 . Thus, f ( x ) = m x + b for some m , b . In fact, note that b = 0 , so f ( x ) = m x ⟹ 3 m x = 2 0 1 3 x m 2 x 2 ⟹ m = 6 0 3 9 , so the answer is 3 9 .
m = 0 is thrown out because f is non-constant.
We have for x != 0 (! stands for not)
2013 x (f(x-1) + f(x) + f(x+1)) = f(x)^2 .............. (i)
Let d be the degree of f(x).
Using (i) we note that
1 + d = 2 d which implies that d = 1
Let f(x) = a x + b. Then, using (i) we have that
(ax + b)^2 = 2013 x (a(x-1) + b + ax + b + a(x+1) + b) = 6039 x (ax + b) ............(ii)
Since f is a non constant polynomial, ax + b is not identically equal to 0.
So, we can cancel it from (ii) , thus getting us
ax + b = 6039x i.e. a = 6039 and b = 0.
Now, a = 6039 leaves a remainder of 39 when divided by 1000.
Hence, 39 is the required answer.
To find the degree of this function, we multiply both sides by 2 0 1 3 x , giving 2 0 1 3 x ( f ( x − 1 ) + f ( x ) + f ( x + 1 ) ) = f ( x ) 2 . Assuming that the degree of f ( x ) is n , the degree of the RHS is 2 n and the LHS is n + 1 . Setting these to be equal, we get n = 1 , and so f ( x ) is linear and in the form of m x + b . Plugging this into our original equation, we get (after some simplifying) 3mx+3b=\frac{f(x)^2}{2013x}, and since we know \(f(x)=mx+b , we have 3 f ( x ) = 2 0 1 3 x f ( x ) 2 . Dividing by f ( x ) and multiplying by 2 0 1 3 x gives f ( x ) = 6 0 3 9 x , f ( 1 ) = 6 0 3 9 and so our answer is 3 9 .
function square when divided by x gives same degree => no constant term & 1st degree => f(x) = kx
Indeed, this did troll me. "polynomials" not "functions," thanks a lot, WOOT
hello, This is not a solution. Sonnsoft
You could have added this as a comment. :facepalm:
Note that for all f ( x ) such that deg ( f ( x ) ) ≥ 2 , deg ( L H S ) < deg ( R H S ) .
Therefore either deg ( f ( x ) ) = 0 , 1 . Since we know that f ( x ) is not constant, deg ( f ( x ) ) = 1 .
We let f ( x ) = a x + b . Plugging in to the equation, we see that 3 a x + 3 b = 2 0 1 3 x a 2 x 2 + 2 a b x + b 2 , or 6 0 3 9 a x + 6 0 3 9 b = a 2 x 2 + 2 a b x + b 2 .
Setting coefficients equal, we get that 6 0 3 9 a = a 2 or a = 6 0 3 9 . Also, b 2 = 0 so b = 0 . Therefore our only polynomial that works is f ( x ) = 6 0 3 9 x .
Plugging in x = 1 and taking m o d 1 0 0 0 , we get the answer of 3 9 .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
First of all, the degree of the LHS is clearly the same as de g ( f ( x ) ) , which I will call d . The degree of the RHS is 2 d − 1 , so d = 2 d − 1 ⟹ d = 1 . Now that we know that f ( x ) is linear, we can replace f ( x ) with a x + b :
( a ( x − 1 ) + b ) + ( a x + b ) + ( a ( x + 1 ) + b ) = 3 ( a x + b ) = 2 0 1 3 x ( a x + b ) 2
Now we have to evaluate a x + b at x = 1 :
3 ( a + b ) = 2 0 1 3 ( a + b ) 2 ⟹ 3 = 2 0 1 3 a + b ⟹ a + b = f ( 1 ) = 6 0 3 9
(Note I divided by ( a + b ) , so a + b = 0 must be taken into account. If this is the case however, it does not affect the sum of all possible values of f ( 1 ) .
So the remainder of 6039 when divided by 1000 is simply the final 3 digits, 3 9 .