k = 1 ∑ ∞ ( 3 k − 2 k ) ( 3 k + 1 − 2 k + 1 ) 6 k
Evaluate the sum above.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Sir , Can you tell the motivation behind splitting the expression into a partial fraction and making it telescopic?
I mean how did you split it into a partial fraction?
Log in to reply
Sums like this, as posted on Brilliant, nearly always work through being telescopic. It was obvious what the denominator ought to be, and it was simply a matter of playing with the numerator to get the right choice.
k = 1 ∑ ∞ ( 3 k − 2 k ) ( 3 k + 1 − 2 k + 1 ) 6 k = k = 1 ∑ ∞ ( 3 k − 2 k ) ( 3 k + 1 − 2 k + 1 ) 2 k . 3 k k = 1 ∑ ∞ ( 3 k − 2 k ) ( 3 k + 1 − 2 k + 1 ) 6 k = k = 1 ∑ ∞ ( 3 k − 2 k ) ( 3 k + 1 − 2 k + 1 ) 2 k . ( ( 3 k + 1 − 2 k + 1 ) − 2 ( 3 k − 2 k ) ) k = 1 ∑ ∞ ( 3 k − 2 k ) ( 3 k + 1 − 2 k + 1 ) 6 k = k = 1 ∑ ∞ ( ( 3 k − 2 k ) 2 k − 3 k + 1 − 2 k + 1 2 k + 1 ) k = 1 ∑ ∞ ( 3 k − 2 k ) ( 3 k + 1 − 2 k + 1 ) 6 k = 2 k = 1 ∑ ∞ ( ( 3 k − 2 k ) 2 k − 1 − 3 k + 1 − 2 k + 1 2 k − 2 )
is telescoping series, hence the sum is 2 .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Since ( 3 k − 2 k ) ( 3 k + 1 − 2 k + 1 ) 6 k = 3 k − 2 k 2 k − 3 k + 1 − 2 k + 1 2 k + 1 the series telescopes, and the sum is 3 − 2 2 = 2