⎩ ⎪ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎪ ⎧ x + k y + 3 z = 0 3 x + k y − 2 z = 0 2 x + 4 y − 3 z = 0
If the system of linear equations above has a non-zero solution ( x , y , z ) , what is y 2 x z ?
Note I am posting the solution which is given in my textbook, (which I am unsatisfied with), so I request you guys to do check my doubt in the solution and hopefully clear it :) Thanks
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
For the matrix equation M r = 0 where M = ⎝ ⎛ 1 3 2 k k 4 3 − 2 − 3 ⎠ ⎞ r = ⎝ ⎛ x y z ⎠ ⎞ to have a solution with nonzero r , we must have d e t M = 0 . But d e t M = 4 4 − 4 k , so we deduce that k = 1 1 . It is easy now to show that r = ⎝ ⎛ 5 α − α 2 α ⎠ ⎞ for some α = 0 , making the answer 1 0 .
Write the system in the standard form A x ′ = b . We notice that the b vector is full of zeroes. Therefore, if matrix A is invertible (non-singular), we will get a trivial solution in which ( x , y , z ) = ( 0 , 0 , 0 ) . So if there is to be a non-zero solution, the system matrix must be singular (its determinant must be zero). In order for the determinant to be zero, the constant k must equal 1 1 . Then solving the system by whatever means yields many possible solutions, but the quantity y 2 x z is always equal to 1 0 . I determined that just by solving it many times using a numerical routine. I'm sure somebody will find a clever way of manipulating the equations to arrive at the answer.
for the equations to have non zero solution, the following determinant should be zero:
i.e. ||1||k||3|| ||3||k||-2|| =0 ||2||4||-3||
(read above as a determinant, not as a table)
this means, on solving the determinant, k=11
now suppose z=a and solve the given equations putting the value of k, and find x and y in terms of a. Then put in (xz)/(y^2), and find the answer.
EDIT: My doubt has been cleared. I was just equating the third plane's equation with the equation of family of planes though intersection of the other other 2 planes, instead of making them proportional. Wholehearted thanks to all of you who replied :)
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
⎩ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎧ x + k y + 3 z = 0 3 x + k y − 2 z = 0 2 x + 4 y − 3 z = 0 . . . ( 1 ) . . . ( 2 ) . . . ( 3 )
( 2 ) − ( 1 ) : 2 x − 5 z ⟹ z ( 3 ) : 2 x + 4 y − 5 6 x ⟹ y = 0 = 5 2 x = 0 = − 5 1 x
Let us check if there is a k that satisfies the system of equations.
⎩ ⎪ ⎨ ⎪ ⎧ ( 1 ) : x − 5 1 k x + 5 6 x = 0 ( 2 ) : 3 x − 5 1 k x − 5 4 x = 0 ⟹ k = 1 1 ⟹ k = 1 1
Therefore there is a unique k satisfying the system of equations and y 2 x z = ( − 5 1 x ) 2 x ( 5 2 x ) = 1 0 .