There are some things in physics that we are so used to taking for granted that we don't even think about them. Consider, for example, the statement that classical physics is local - physical systems involve interactions that occur at the same points in space and at the same times. Does this have to be so? Let's look at a simple spring to see what happens to physics if we make things a little non-local.
The equation of motion for the position of a mass at the end of a spring with spring constant is
if the other end of the spring is fixed in space. Consider solutions to this equation of the form where is a constant (which is a priori possibly complex). Let be the number of possible values for that satisfy this equation.
We'll now make the spring equation slightly non-local in time. We do this by letting the acceleration of the mass be determined by not just , but by a combination of the position at two different times, and , where is a constant. The new equation of motion is
so that as we return to the usual equation for a spring. This second equation with also has solutions of the form for certain values of . Let be the number of possible values of that satisfy this second equation of motion. What is ?
Hint: don't make any extra assumptions about than you absolutely need to.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
The local equation is the 2nd order ODE, which implies it has two linearly independent solutions. Thus N = 2 .
The non-local equation can be transformed to the local one by assuming that x ( t ) is an infinitely differentiable function and as such can be expanded into Taylor series around t with displacement Δ t :
x ( t + Δ t ) = ∑ n = 0 ∞ d t n d n x ( t ) n ! Δ t n ,
which, after substitution, leads to the ODE of order infinity. As before, this implies that the equation has infinitely many linearly independent solutions, and M = ∞ .
The result is then M N = ∞ 2 = 0 .