The Pivotals of Mathematics

Algebra Level 5

a + b + c = λ a+b+c=\lambda for reals a , b , c a,b,c . We define t n = c y c a 2 n + 1 \displaystyle t_n= \sum \limits_{cyc} a^{2n+1} for n N n\in \text{N} . Further it's given that t 1 = λ 3 t_1={\lambda}^3 . Find the value of λ \lambda if n = 1 t n = 1 6 \displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} t_n=\frac{1}{6} .

Note: This is my original problem belonging to the set Questions I've Made © . Give a try to its sister problem


The answer is 0.5.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Joel Tan
Feb 23, 2015

t 1 = a 3 + b 3 + c 3 = ( a + b + c ) 3 t_{1}=a^{3}+b^{3}+c^{3}=(a+b+c)^{3} .

Expanding and subtracting a 3 + b 3 + c 3 a^{3}+b^{3}+c^{3} from both sides of the equation, then factorising gives the key result: 3 ( a + b ) ( b + c ) ( c + a ) = 0 3 (a+b)(b+c)(c+a)=0

Thus one of ( a + b ) , ( b + c ) , ( c + a ) = 0 (a+b), (b+c), (c+a) =0 .

WLOG let a + b = 0 a+b=0 then t n = a 2 n + 1 + ( a ) 2 n + 1 + c 2 n + 1 = c 2 n + 1 t_{n}=a^{2n+1}+(-a)^{2n+1}+c^{2n+1}=c^{2n+1} .

Let the infinite sum be S. Summing all t i t_{i} gives c 3 1 c 2 \frac {c^{3}}{1-c^{2}} . This is by the formula for geometric progressions. Another condition for c c appears, which is that the absolute value of c <1. But solving the equation S = 1 6 S=\frac {1}{6} gives only one real solution c = 0.5 a + b + c = 0.5 c=0.5 \implies a+b+c=0.5 .

How can there be no loss in generality when assumed that a + b = 0 a+b = 0 ? Please explain !

Venkata Karthik Bandaru - 6 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Because he's saying that the same logic can be applied for b + c = 0 b + c = 0 and a + c = 0 a + c = 0

Kyle Coughlin - 5 years, 11 months ago

When I read your solution my whole hard work on this question went in vain. This is not fair!

Aakash Khandelwal - 5 years, 10 months ago

In front of your solution mine is just madness of millennium . I expanded the expression

Aakash Khandelwal - 5 years, 10 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...