The Riemann Zeta Function

ζ ( 1 2 ) = ? \large \zeta \left(\frac 12\right) = \ ?

Notation: ζ ( ) \zeta (\cdot) denotes the Riemann zeta function .

3 π 4 -\frac {3\pi}4 1.460354508809586 -1.460354508809586⋯ The series diverges π 2 - \frac \pi 2

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

ζ(s)=∑nn−s when that makes sense. But ζ has an "analytic continuation" to much of the rest of the complex plane.

Consider the equality:

11−z=∑n=0∞zn

The right side only converges and equals the left side when |z|<1.

But complex analysis has this awesome feature - that any function has at most one analytic continuations to the regions where it is not already defined.[*] So 11−z is the only analytic continuation of the right side for complex z.

The same is true for the ζ function. We first define it for s where the real part is greater than one. And then we find a way to continue that function for other values of s.

The heart of the extension of ζ, at least to 1/2, is that, for s>1:

(1−12s−1)∑n1ns=∑n1ns−2∑n1(2n)s=∑n(−1)n−1ns

The right side is defined for any s∈(0,1], since it is the sum of an alternating decreasing sequence. (It converges for other s with Res>0, but it isn't 100% obvious looking at it that this is true.[**])

This lets us extend ζ(s) to s∈(0,1):

ζ(s)=11−12s−1∑n(−1)n−1ns

This is equal to our original definition when Res>1.

So ζ(1/2)=11−2–√∑n(−1)n−1n−−√

Computing for M=200,000,000 terms of this sum I get:

11−2–√∑n=1M(−1)n−1n−−√≈−1.460269

This series converges very slowly.

Source of explanation: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1613392/why-zeta-1-2-1-4603545088

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...