Which of these statements are always true?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Solution:
It is very important to understand that these sequences have infinite number of elements.
A1. Any sequence that converges is automatically Cauchy's. Reverse is not always true.
A2. If sequence is Cauchy's, then it converges iff it is in complete metric space . (Basically, the definition for complete metric spaces is: a metric space is complete iff every Cauchy's sequence converges).
B1. Bolzano-Weierstrass theorem
C1. Example: c n = n , for every n . This sequence is strictly monotonic (strictly increasing), yet it diverges.
D1.
( ∀ R > 0 ) ( ∃ n 0 ∈ N ) ( ∀ n ∈ N ) ( ( n ≥ n 0 ) ⇒ ( d n ∈ L ( d , R ) ) ) [1]
For any infinite M ⊂ N where m ∈ M , sequence { d m } will be sub-sequence of { d n } , so that:
( ∃ m 0 ∈ M ) ( ∀ m n ∈ M ) ( ( m n ≥ m 0 ≥ n 0 ) ⇒ ( d m n ∈ L ( d , R ) ) ) [2]
[1] { d n } converges to d
[2] Any sub-sequence of { d n } converges to d as well.
E: false
E1. Example: x n = n 2 and y n = n 1 . Clearly x n > y n for all n . However, both sequences converge to 0 .
E2. If last " > " is replaced with " ≥ " from statement E, a very similar statement will be made, but this one is always true.
Conclusion: Statements B and D are always true.