Theres a faster construction

Geometry Level 5

Given a line l l and a point P P on l l , what is the minimium number of uses of a straightedge or compass in order to construct a line through P P perpendicular to l l ?


All terminology in this question is explained in the first note of my straightedge and compass set. More straightedge and compass constructions can be found there.

6 5 2 3 4

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Sharky Kesa
Aug 31, 2016

Construct two distinct arbitrary points on the line. Call them A A and B B . These require 0 moves. From each point, draw a circle which passes through P P , so a total of 2 moves. These circles intersect on P P and its reflection over the line P P' (By symmetry), so P P PP' is perpendicular to l l . Constructing P P PP' takes one move so there are a total of three moves.


Just realised it said P P is on l l . In this case, construct an arbitrary point A A not on the l l . Let it be the centre of a circle passing through P P . If it intersects with l l only once, then it must be perpendicular, so it took only 2 moves. However, it is more likely to intersect l l again at P P' . Let the ray A P AP' intersect the circle at Q Q . By Thales' theorem, Q P P = 9 0 \angle QPP'=90^{\circ} , so Q P QP is perpendicular to l l and it took 3 moves.

Yep, that's pretty much it

Wen Z - 4 years, 9 months ago

Your two statements are confusing. I think it would be better if your solution does not include what You have realized, but just presented it directly.

Niranjan Khanderia - 4 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Sorry about the confusion but it is to show that you can do it in 3 moves no matter what arrangement you have, so it is more of an extension.

Sharky Kesa - 4 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes it does show that three moves are sufficient. Thank you for that. My only intension is that many more would understand construction with ease.

Niranjan Khanderia - 4 years, 9 months ago

Took me half an hour to figure out a faster way.If there was no hint in the title of this problem, I would have surely got this one wrong.

Anupam Nayak - 4 years, 9 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...