These are not the droids that you are looking for - Part 2

Logic Level 1

In an attempt to escape capture, R2D2 painted himself red to confuse the bounty hunter Boba Fett. Luke Skywalker came back and is trying to identify R2D2. Can you help him?

Image credit: Wikipedia Piotrus
Droid 3 Droid 2 Droid 1

View wiki
Chung Kevin by Chung Kevin , 45, Australia

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

4 solutions

Chew-Seong Cheong
Apr 15, 2015

Droid 3's statement says the same thing as Droid 1's. These are therefore the 2 true statements and they say that D r o i d 1 \boxed{Droid 1} is R2D2. Droid 2's statement is false.

Try also Part 0 and Part 1 .

6 Helpful 0 Interesting 0 Brilliant 0 Confused
Ujjwala Ananth
Apr 16, 2015

For two statements to be true AND agree with each other, DROID 1 and DROID 3 must be true. Both point to DROID 1 being R2D2

2 Helpful 0 Interesting 0 Brilliant 0 Confused

I wonder where C3PO is.

Chung Kevin - 6 years, 1 month ago
Chloe Tiara
Apr 23, 2015

Droid 1's statement can be proven to be true by Droid 3's statement and the latter clearly supports the former's statement. These two statements are now decidedly correct, thus leaving Droid 2's statement out. The droid we are looking for is Droid 1.

1 Helpful 0 Interesting 0 Brilliant 0 Confused

That's right!

Chung Kevin - 6 years, 1 month ago
Shashank Vashist
Apr 22, 2015

For two statements to be correct they must be supportive of each other and hence statement 2 was neglected and we got the answer as. DROID #1

1 Helpful 0 Interesting 0 Brilliant 0 Confused

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...