Trace Finder

Algebra Level 5

If A = [ a b c d ] A=\begin{bmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{bmatrix} is a real matrix with A 3 = I 2 A^3=I_2 , find the minimal value of the trace, a + d a+d ?


The answer is -1.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Otto Bretscher
Mar 16, 2016

The solution I had in mind is equivalent to Guillermo's, but using the language of eigenvalues:

If A v = λ v A\mathbf{v}=\lambda \mathbf{v} , then A 3 v = λ 3 v = v A^3\mathbf{v}=\lambda^3 \mathbf{v}=\mathbf{v} , so that λ 3 = 1 \lambda^3=1 . Now λ 1 = λ 2 = 1 \lambda_1=\lambda_2=1 or λ 1 = ω = e 2 π i / 3 , λ 2 = ω 2 \lambda_1=\omega=e^{2\pi i/3}, \lambda_2=\omega^2 . The trace is the sum of the eigenvalues, so that the minimum is ω + ω 2 = 1 \omega+\omega^2=\boxed{-1} .

How are we writting lambda cube corresponding to A cube?

Dipanjan Chowdhury - 5 years, 2 months ago

Log in to reply

Just use A v = λ v A\mathbf{v}=\lambda\mathbf{v} repeatedly and pull λ \lambda up front:

A 3 v = A A A v = A A ( λ v ) = λ A A v = λ A ( λ v ) = λ 2 A v = λ 3 v A^3\mathbf{v}=AAA\mathbf{v}=AA(\lambda\mathbf{v})=\lambda AA\mathbf{v}=\lambda A(\lambda\mathbf{v})=\lambda^2A\mathbf{v}=\lambda^3\mathbf{v}

Otto Bretscher - 5 years, 2 months ago

One solution to this problem is the matrix ( 0 1 1 1 ) \left(\begin{array} {c c} 0 & -1 \\ 1 & -1 \end{array} \right) . As A 3 = I 2 A 3 I 2 = 0 = ( A I 2 ) ( A 2 + A + I 2 ) A^3 = I_2 \Rightarrow A^3 - I_2 = 0 = (A - I_2)(A^2 + A + I_2) \Rightarrow the minimum polynomial p m ( A ) p_{m}(A) associated to A is A I 2 A - I_2 or A 2 + A + I 2 A^2 + A + I_2 because its degree is less or equal than 2 and it belongs to R [ X ] \mathbb{R}[X] . In the first case, A = I 2 A = I_ 2 and a + d = 2, but this case leads to a larger value, which we ignore, so we take p m ( A ) = A 2 + A + I 2 p_{m}(A) = A^2 + A + I_ 2 and then p m ( A ) p_{m}(A) has to coincide with the characteristical polynomial p c ( A ) p_c(A) of A, which implies that trace(A) = a + d = -1 due to p c ( A ) = A 2 t r a c e ( A ) A + d e t ( A ) p_c(A) = A^2 - trace(A) \cdot A + det(A)

Is that the Cayley- Hamilton theorem?

Orgil Jargalsaikhan - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

yes, Cayley Hamilton theorem is there implicitly.

Guillermo Templado - 5 years, 3 months ago

Yes that works! Thanks! (+1)

Otto Bretscher - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Thank you, I'm going soon to try to post a solution to this problem but i have some problems...

Guillermo Templado - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

I'm really looking forward to your solution; I had forgotten about that problem

Otto Bretscher - 5 years, 3 months ago

As a side note, instead of "so this case doesn't work", what you mean is "so this case leads to a larger value, which we ignore".

The reason for the edit is because the case does indeed work, but just doesn't lead to a smaller value than what we've already found.

Calvin Lin Staff - 5 years, 3 months ago

Log in to reply

Amended,thanks

Guillermo Templado - 5 years, 3 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...