A (non-degenerate) trapezium has side lengths 6 , 8 , 1 0 and 1 2 . What is its area?
Details and assumptions
A trapezium has a pair of parallel sides.
You are not given the order of the side lengths, nor which sides are parallel.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Great explanation! Is there a simple description for the set of side lengths a < b < c < d such that we have a unique trapezoid?
By the way, there's a typo. The last-row-first-column entry should be 1 0 .
I really appreciate your work. Generally, I think that we can try to determine the height of trapezoid in every of six cases. Here, only the case 6, 12, 8, 10 is favourable!
هااااااااااااااااااااااااااى
Note that all non-degenerate trapezoids with congruent but not necessarily corresponding side lengths have the same area. So any non-degenerate trapezoid with side lengths 6 , 8 , 1 0 , 1 2 will satisfy for the purpose of our calculation.
Construct a right triangle A B C with A B = 8 , B C = 6 , A C = 1 0 and B C is horizontal. Draw D C such that D C = 1 0 and A D is parallel to B C . Since A C D is isosceles, the median drawn from C creates a rectangle A B C M . Thus, A M = B C = 6 and A D = 1 2 , giving us a non-degenerate trapezoid with side lengths 6 , 8 , 1 0 , 1 2 .
The area of triangle A B C is ( 2 1 ) ( 6 ) ( 8 ) = 2 4 and, using Heron's formula, the area of triangle A C D is ( 1 6 ) ( 6 ) ( 6 ) ( 4 ) = 4 8 . Thus, the area of trapezoid A B C D is 2 4 + 4 8 = 7 2 .
I disagree with the claim that "Note that all non-degenerate trapezoids with congruent but not necessarily corresponding side lengths have the same area. " For example, considering all rhombuses with side length of 1, the area is dependent on the angle, and is not a constant.
I have a question. You said that
Note that all non-degenerate trapezoids with congruent but not necessarily corresponding side lengths have the same area.
Could you explain that a bit? An example would be good.
Log in to reply
Michael T said:
Note that all non-degenerate trapezoids with congruent but not necessarily corresponding side lengths have the same area.
It does matter. In fact, if the side lengths were changed to 6 + ϵ , 8 , 1 0 , 1 2 for an arbitrarily small ϵ > 0 , then there would be a second solution where 8 , 1 2 are the parallel sides and such that the area of the trapezoid is arbitrarily small (i.e. goes to zero as ϵ goes to zero).
I guess it was a bad assumption, but considering the unspecificity of the problem, i.e. "a non-degenerate trapezoid has side lengths 6, 8, 10, 12 and has an area" implies that the area is unique for any side lengths 6, 8, 10, 12. After some thinking I'm pretty sure that the reason why 6, 8, 10, 12 are "special" is that there is only non-degenerate trapezoid which can be formed from such side lengths, namely the one where 6 and 12 are the parallel sides and 8 and 10 are the non-parallel sides. Further discussion about what makes a trapezoid valid or not (whether its triangles satisfy a + b > c ) can be seen in Mursalin's solution below.
Let the trapezoid be E F L K , with E F ∥ L K the bases (parallel sides). Let a = E F , b = L K , c = E K , and d = F L ; without loss of generality, assume a > b and c ≥ d .
Let G be a point on E F such that E G L K is a parallelogram; then G L = c , E G = b , and G F = a − b . Apply the triangle inequality in triangle G F L : this results in the condition G L < F L + F G ∴ c < d + a − b ∴ a + d > b + c .
Of the 24 possible assignments of 6 , 8 , 1 0 , 1 2 to a , b , c , d , there is only one that satisfies the three conditions a > b , c ≥ d , and a + d > b + c . This is a = 1 2 , b = 6 , c = 1 0 , d = 8 .
If the height of the parallelogram is h , we must have c 2 = h 2 + x 2 and d 2 = h 2 + y 2 , with x + y = a − b = 6 , with y possibly negative.
Now ( c + d ) ( c − d ) = c 2 − d 2 = ( h 2 + x 2 ) − ( h 2 + y 2 ) = x 2 − y 2 = ( x + y ) ( x − y ) , so that x − y = x + y ( c + d ) ( c − d ) = 6 1 8 ⋅ 2 = 6 , from which it follows that x = 6 and y = 0 . It is easy to see that the height of the parallelogram is h = 6 . Finally, A = 2 1 h ( a + b ) = 2 1 ⋅ 6 ⋅ ( 1 2 + 6 ) = 7 2 .
According to Pythagoras' Theorem, 6,8,10 is one of the Pythagorean Triples .
We let the angle between 6, 8 equals to 90 degrees. Then we will get 10 as the hypotenuse.
One of the side of the trapezoid equals to 10, so we let this side and the hypotenuse of the triangle (6,8,10) form a isosceles triangle, with a base 12.
So, we will get a trapezoid with sides 8,6,10,12 accordingly.
The area of the right-angle triangle is 6 \times 8 \times \frac{1}{2} = 24 square units
We can use Pythagoras' Theorem to find out the height of the isosceles triangle with sides 10, 10 and 12. Draw a perpendicular line on the base. It's also the median of the triangle. Then we get { \frac{12}{2} }^2 + {height}^2 = {10}^2 . By solving the equation, we get the height as 8 units.Therefore, the area of the isosceles triangle = 12 \times 8 \times \frac{1}{2} = 48 square units.
Hence, the area of the trapezoid = Area of Right-angle Triangle + Area of Isosceles Triangle = 24 + 48 = 72 square units.
In your solution, you constructed a trapezoid with side lengths 6 , 8 , 1 0 , 1 2 . And the area of that trapezoid was 7 2 .
It is important to show that this trapezoid is the only non-degenerate trapezoid possible with the given side lengths.
Sometimes we get multiple trapezoids with 4 given side-lengths and as a result get multiple possible areas.
You can't think like this: "Hey, this problem wants one answer. So it is the only answer." You'll have to prove why 7 2 is the only possible answer.
To format your math in LaTeX, put \ (...\ ) [without the spaces between \ and the brackets] around your equations.
For example: 6 \times 8 \times \frac{1}{2} = 24 becomes 6 × 8 × 2 1 = 2 4
Let a and b be the parallel sides of the trapezoid, b and c be the remaining 2 sides of the trapezoid.
Let a > b and c > d
Since the trapezoid is n o n − d e g e n e r a t e
therefore, from the formula
A r e a o f t r a p e z o i d = ∣ a − b ∣ a + b ( ( − a + b + c + d ) ( a − b + c + d ) ( a − b + c − d ) ( a − b − c + d ) )
We have the inequalities,
a + c > b + d
a + d > b + c
Since a + c and a + d = 1 8 , hence by logic when a = 6 , 8 , 1 0 , the values of b , c , d contradict the inequalities above. The only possible values are a = 1 2 , b = 6 , c = 1 0 , d = 8
Let a = x + y + 6 , h as the height of the trapezoid and where by applying the P y t h a g o r a s ′ s T h e o r e m , we have
8 2 − x 2 = h 2
1 0 2 − y 2 = h 2
x + y = 6
Solving the simultaneous equations, we have x = 0 , y = 6 , hence we can conclude that the height, h of the trapezoid is d = 8
A r e a o f t r a p e z o i d = 2 1 ( a + b ) ( d ) = 7 2
A good solution! I learnt something new from this solution. I'm voting you up!
Some formatting tips:
To format text in LaTeX, use \text{...}. For example: P y t h a g o r a s ′ T h e o r e m becomes Pythagoras’ Theorem .
Using curly brackets after the square root symbol ensures that the whole expression goes underneath it. For example: Your area formula becomes:
4 ∣ a − b ∣ a + b ( − a + b + c + d ) ( a − b + c + d ) ( a − b + c − d ) ( a − b − c + d ) .
Finally, I don't realize why you went through all the trouble to get the height of the trapezoid after you had figured out what the parallel sides were. You could have plugged those values in your big formula for the area.
Thanks for the tips on formatting text in LaTex :) This is my first time typing in LaTeX format, so please bear with me, I will improve next time :)
Oh I went through the trouble to show that the height is 8 because usually we just tend to use the formula,
A r e a = 2 1 ( a + b ) ( h )
and it's quite fun finding the height as well haha :)
A typing mistake on the formula of trapezoid that I found on Wikipedia, it should be : A r e a o f t r a p e z o i d = 4 ∣ a − b ∣ a + b ( ( − a + b + c + d ) ( a − b + c + d ) ( a − b + c − d ) ( a − b − c + d ) )
@Calvin Lin we have for the existence of trapezium, |a-b|>|d-c| where a,b are parallel sides,from the numbers we can see only (12,6) can be the parallel sides
Call the distance between the parallel side x . (What else, I ask you?)
Now we can choose pairs of possible parallel sides from the four given. One of these will be longer than the other. There will be right triangles formed (possibly degenerate) at the two ends of the trapezium between the parallel sides. We can find quadratic equations in x now for each possible pair of sides and attempt to solve them.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 |
|
If I tried to do this 'manually' I'd be at it for days and I would still get the wrong answer. Someone with insight would have got this instantly.
1 2 3 4 5 |
|
Because we're not given the order of the side lengths or which sides are parallel, we can arrange them any way. The easiest way is with the parallel sides being 6 and 12. This creates a right trapezoid of height 8. The area is then ((6 + 12) / 2) * 8 = 72
Because we're not given the order of the side lengths or which sides are parallel, we can arrange them any way.
That is not true. What would happen if the given side-lengths were 6 , 8 , 1 0 and 1 1 ?
It is sometimes possible to construct multiple trapezoids with given side-lengths and as a result get different areas. You will have to justify why 7 2 is the only possible answer here.
By the way, if the side-lengths were 6 , 8 , 1 0 and 1 1 , it would be possible to construct three different trapezoids with different areas.
So you can't just say,"Since no side-length-order is given, I can just arrange the side lengths anyway I want and get the area I'm looking for."
The fact that the order of the side-lengths is not given makes this problem worth 180 points and not just a simple computation problem.
Log in to reply
thanks Mursalin H. ... for info that "if the side-lengths were 6, 8, 10 and 11, it would be possible to construct three different trapezoids with different areas"...i will try to get it
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Notice that we don't know which sides of the trapezoid are parallel. And we have to figure that out.
From this point on, we're going to call our trapezoid A B C D with A B = a , B C = d , C D = b and D A = c . Without loss of generality, we can say b > a . And we're going to say that A B ∣ ∣ C D .
Now let's draw a line B E parallel to A D and say B E intersects C D at E . Since we said earlier that C D > A B , we can ensure that the point E will be strictly on the line segment C D .
Now our trapezoid A B C D is divided into a parallelogram A B E D and a triangle B E C .
And,
A B = D E = a .
A D = B E = c ,
B C = d ,
C E = b − a .
In order for △ B E C to have a positive area, its sides must fulfill the triangle inequality. That means the sum of any two sides of △ B E C must be greater than the other side.
So, we must have:
c + ( b − a ) > d ⇒ b − a > d − c
c + d > b − a
d + ( b − a ) > c ⇒ b − a > c − d .
All these inequalities must hold if △ B E C is non-degenerate.
Letting d > c [WLOG], these inequalities can be written like this:
d − c < b − a < c + d .
Now we're going to find out the possible cases for a and b . With the constraint of a < b , it gives us 6 cases to consider:
a 6 6 6 8 8 8 b 8 1 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 2 c 1 0 8 8 6 6 6 d 1 2 1 2 1 0 1 2 1 0 8 d − c 2 4 2 6 4 2 b − a 2 4 6 2 4 2 c + d 2 2 2 0 1 8 1 8 1 6 1 4 does it fulfill the requirements? no no yes no no no
We see that there is only one case that satisfies all the requirements. Luckily for us, it turns out that in this case △ B E C is a right triangle with side lengths 6 , 8 and 1 0 . [If it was not a right triangle, we'd have to work a bit more to find the trapezoid height]
So the height of our trapezoid is simply B E = c = 8 .
And its area= 2 1 × ( A B + C D ) × B E = 2 1 × ( a + b ) × c
= 2 1 × ( 6 + 1 2 ) × 8 = 7 2 .