In a large equilateral triangle, we draw the incircle. We then draw a smaller equilateral triangle in the incircle.
What is the ratio of the area of the smaller equilateral triangle to that of the larger equilateral triangle?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
An excellent solution
Yes! I rotated it around to make it less obvious :)
A lot simpler than my solution, I love it. I was way over-thinking it, I used law of sines and the rule for the in-radius to get my answer.
This is so nice! haha
Your creativity touched my heart!
I did as the way as you solved it out...
If the inner triangle is flipped upside down, it can be simply seen than the outer triangle can contain 4 numbers of the triangles of the size of the inner one
Nice way of seeing it. Makes it short and simple.
Let the radius of the circle be denoted by R
Let the side length of the large triangle be denoted by M
Let the side length of the small triangle be denoted by N
It is easy to prove that
M 2 = 1 2 R 2 ,
N 2 = 3 R 2
The ratio of the two areas = N 2 : M 2 = 1 : 4 . □
Can you explain how you got the coefficients of 12 and 3?
Sir,not undrstand 12,3
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Rotate the inner triangle 6 0 ∘ (or flip it upside down) to see the famous Triforce from the Legend of Zelda series. (Or the first iteration of the Sierpinski triangle) The new figure, ignoring the circle, consists of 4 congruent triangles. The area of the small triangle is therefore 4 1 of the large triangle.