Pick’s theorem states that, given a polygon with vertices on a unit square lattice, the relationship between the area A S of the polygon, the number of boundary points B of the polygon, and the number of interior points I of the polygon is A S = I + 2 1 B − 1 .
There exists a similar relationship for a polygon with vertices on an equilateral triangle lattice in which the area of the smallest possible triangle is 1.
If A T is the area of the polygon, B is the number of boundary points of the polygon, and I is the number of interior points of the polygon, then the relationship is A T = a I + b B + c .
What is ∣ a ∣ + ∣ b ∣ + ∣ c ∣ ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
this solution makes all others look like brute force XD
They gave that the form of the equation would be linear, so I just chose 3 triangles that I knew what their area was. First was just the regular unit triangle, then a triangle with doubled side length, and finally a triangle with 3 side lengths. Solving that system gave a =2, b=1, and c= -2
0*a+ 3b + c = 1
0*a+ 6b + c =4
b=1 c=-2
a + 9* b + c = 9
a+9-2= 9
a = 2
2+2+1=5
*5 *
Three simple cases give three independent linear equations for a , b , c .
First case: the small triangle. Here I = 0 , B = 3 and A = 1 .
Second case: parallelogram made of two triangles. Now I = 0 , B = 4 and A = 2 .
Third case: regular hexagon made of six triangles. We have I = 1 , B = 6 and A = 6 .
Formally, we solve the equation ⎝ ⎛ 0 0 1 3 4 6 1 1 1 ⎠ ⎞ ⎝ ⎛ a b c ⎠ ⎞ = ⎝ ⎛ 1 2 6 ⎠ ⎞ , ⎝ ⎛ a b c ⎠ ⎞ = ⎝ ⎛ 2 1 − 2 ⎠ ⎞ . Or, note that between the first and second case, adding one to B also adds one to A , so that b = 1 ; from either case follows c = − 2 and the third case then gives a = 2 .
The solution is ∣ a ∣ + ∣ b ∣ + ∣ c ∣ = 2 + 1 + 2 = 5 .
Nicely done!
Note: This solution assumes that the linear relationship A T = a I + b B + c holds. David's solution explains why this assumption is valid.
Log in to reply
That is true, although he has to appeal to the usual Pick's Theorem to do so.
Log in to reply
Indeed. One way of proving Pick's theorem is by showing
For a proof of the Pick's theorem in an equilateral triangle lattice, we can also proceed in a similar manner, using corresponding triangles/parallelograms with sides parallel to the axis.
Lmao I guessed 5 and I actually got it right
It's super late right now and I'm too tired to do this logically. I guessed a random number and got it right, so that's cool.
That's illegal
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
A unit square lattice grid can be stretched and skewed to a unit equilateral triangle lattice grid, where each unit square would transform to a parallelogram composed of 2 unit equilateral triangles and have an area of 2 .
Since the area is doubled for the same number of boundary and interior points, the formula for Pick’s Theorem is also doubled and becomes A T = 2 I + B − 2 , making a = 2 , b = 1 , and c = − 2 , and the sum of ∣ a ∣ , ∣ b ∣ , and ∣ c ∣ is ∣ a ∣ + ∣ b ∣ + ∣ c ∣ = 2 + 1 + 2 = 5 .