This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
We will require that ( x + y ) = 0 , for even if x = y = 0 the fraction on the RHS will be indeterminate. However, this is not a sufficient condition, since we could have x = 2 1 , y = 2 3 yielding ( x + y ) 2 4 x y = 4 3 , which is not possible since we know that sec 2 ( θ ) ≥ 1 for all θ . Now given this last inequality, we see that we must also have
4 x y ≥ ( x + y ) 2 = x 2 + y 2 + 2 x y ⟹ 2 x y ≥ x 2 + y 2 .
Now as sec 2 ( θ ) ≥ 1 we see that x and y must have the same sign, so in essence we only need to look at the case where x , y are positive. But in that case, by the AM-GM inequality, we know that x 2 + y 2 ≥ 2 x y . These two inequalities then imply that
x 2 + y 2 = 2 x y ⟹ ( x − y ) 2 = 0 ⟹ x = y .
Now we have already noted the requirement that x + y = 0 , so since we also require that x = y it can be inferred that x = 0 . Thus the option x = y , x = 0 is the correct choice.