In the diagram above, suppose that B A 1 = A 1 A 2 = A 2 C and A C 1 = C 1 B . If C 1 Y = 2 0 1 7 , then X Y = q p , where p and q are coprime positive integers. Find p + q .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
The position of point A is immaterial because ratios between segments in the same direction are not affected by affine transformations. We choose affine coordinates with B at the origin, B C along the x -axis, and B A along the y -axis, and choose units such that B C 1 = B A 1 = 1 0 .
The coordinates of relevant points are now C 1 : ( 0 , 1 0 ) ; A 1 : ( 1 0 , 0 ) ; A 2 : ( 2 0 , 0 ) . The equations for the various lines of interest are ℓ 0 ( C 1 C ) : y = 1 0 − 3 1 x , ℓ 1 ( A 1 A ) : y = 2 0 − 2 x , ℓ 2 ( A 1 A ) : y = 2 0 − x . Equating ℓ 0 and ℓ 1 gives Y : ( 6 , 8 ) ; likewise, equating ℓ 0 and ℓ 2 gives X : ( 1 5 , 5 ) .
Now the segment C 1 Y is given by the vector ( 6 , − 2 ) , and the segment Y X by the vector ( 9 , − 3 ) . Clearly C 1 Y Y X = 2 3 , so that Y X = 2 3 ⋅ 2 0 1 7 = 2 6 0 5 1 . We submit the result 6 0 5 1 + 2 = 6 0 5 3 .
Nice coordinate geometry solution. I didn't know that coordinate geometry can be used to work out geometry problem like these. Cheers!!!! Continue to give such solution for geometry problems. One good thing about using this method is that you don't have to memorise a lot of geometric theorems.
Brilliant...
For this solution, we will apply the Ratio Lemma, which states that for any point X ′ on side Y Z of triangle X Y Z , we have
X Z X Y ⋅ sin ∠ X ′ X Z sin ∠ Y X X ′ = X ′ Z Y X ′ .
First, we will find A A 2 A X . Let α 1 = ∠ A C C 1 and α 2 = ∠ C 1 C B . By the lemma, we know that C 1 B A C 1 = B C A C ⋅ sin α 2 sin α 1 . Thus, B C A C ⋅ sin α 2 sin α 1 = 1 . We also can find that X A 2 A X = C A 2 A C ⋅ sin α 2 sin α 1 . Using the equation we derived and the fact that A 2 C = 3 B C , we get X A 2 A X = 3 , which indicates that A A 2 A X = 4 3 .
Now, we apply the same strategy we used to find A A 2 A X to find Y X C 1 Y . Let β 1 = ∠ B A A 1 and β 2 = ∠ A 1 A A 2 . By the Ratio Lemma, we can find that A A 2 A B ⋅ sin β 2 sin β 1 = A 1 A 2 B A 1 = 1 and Y X C 1 Y = A X A C 1 ⋅ sin β 2 sin β 1 . Plugging in C 1 A = 2 A B and A X = 4 3 A A 2 into the latter equation, we can simplify it into Y X C 1 Y = 3 2 . Setting C 1 Y = 2 0 1 7 and solving for X Y yields X Y = 2 6 0 5 1 . Thus, p + q = 6 0 5 3 .
Damn, this lemma certainly kills this problem easily!
I don't think I've heard of the Ratio Lemma before. Does this lemma go by another (more common) name?
Log in to reply
I don't know, when I learned it, it was called the Ratio Lemma. It's a generalization of the Angle Bisector Theorem. Here's an AoPS thread on it (can't seem to find any other website that mentions it in detail).
Although I hadn't heard of the Ratio Lemma either, the proposition that it states can readily be derived from the Law of Sines.
Draw a line segment through C 1 parallel to side B C .
∠ Y C A 1 = ∠ X C A 2 = ∠ Y C 1 Y 1 = ∠ X C 1 X 1 (Alternate angles)
∠ C 1 Y Y 1 = ∠ C Y A 1 and ∠ C 1 X X 1 = ∠ C X A 2 (Vertically Opposite Angles)
Therefore, △ Y A 1 C ∼ △ Y Y 1 C 1
Since C 1 B 1 is parallel to side B C and C 1 is the midpoint of side A B .
A B A C 1 = B A 1 C 1 Y 1 = A 1 A 2 Y 1 X 1 = A 2 C X 1 B 1 = 2 1 (Basic proportionality theorem)
Therefore, Y 1 and X 1 trisect C 1 B 1 .
Let B A 1 = A 1 A 2 = A 2 C = 2 x then
C 1 Y 1 = Y 1 X ! = X 1 B 1 = x
Therefore, Y 1 C 1 A 1 C = x 4 x = 4
Since △ Y A 1 C ∼ △ Y Y 1 C 1
C 1 Y C Y = Y 1 C 1 A 1 C = x 4 x = 4
C A 2 C 1 X 1 = C A 2 C 1 Y 1 + Y 1 X 1 = 2 x x + x = 1
Therefore, △ C 1 X X 1 ≅ △ C X A 2
Therefore, C 1 X = C X
C 1 Y C Y = C 1 Y Y X + C X = 4
But C 1 X = C X
C 1 Y Y X + C 1 X = 4
C 1 Y Y X + C 1 Y + Y X = 4
C 1 Y 2 Y X + C 1 Y = 4
Y X = 2 3 C 1 Y
Y X = 2 3 × 2 0 1 7
Y X = 2 6 0 5 1
Therefore, Ans is 6 0 5 1 + 2 = 6 0 5 3
This makes the most sense to me since all steps are based on simple basic geometry. Thank you!
This is a sort of a brute force method of solving the problem since I was too lazy to use trigonometry and I couldn't think of a simpler geometric method. Since no angle is given in this problem, I assumed that this is a constant value for all triangles. To simplify the problem, I used an equilateral triangle so that the side lengths of the triangle would be equal. I plotted this in the cartesian plane with a side length of 1. I graphed the median through point C and found the function to be y = − 3 3 x + 3 3 . I then found the equation of the lines for the trisectors of line BC A A 1 and A A 2 , which turned out to be y = 3 3 x − 3 and y = − 3 3 x + 2 3 respectively. Solving for x and substituting for y, I got point Y is ( 5 2 , 5 3 ) and point X is ( 8 5 , 8 3 ) . Using pythagorean theorem, I found that C 1 Y = 1 0 3 and Y X = 4 0 6 3 . From there, I found C 1 Y Y X = 1 0 3 4 0 6 3 = 4 0 6 0 = 2 3 So in the diagram, Y X = 2 3 ⋅ 2 0 1 7 = 2 6 0 5 1 Adding 6 0 5 1 and 2 gets us 6 0 5 1 + 2 = 6 0 5 3
This is not the nicest solution but areal coordinates do work quite well:
Using areal coordinates with respect to triangle ABC, the coordinates of the points are:
A = ( 1 , 0 , 0 ) B = ( 0 , 1 , 0 ) C = ( 0 , 0 , 1 ) A 1 = ( 0 , 3 2 , 3 1 ) A 2 = ( 0 , 3 1 , 3 2 ) C 1 = ( 2 1 , 2 1 , 0 )
The equation of the line A A 1 is y = 2 z and the equation of the line A A 2 is y = 2 1 z
The equation of the line C C 1 is x = y
Solving simultaneously gives Y = ( 5 2 , 5 2 , 5 1 ) and Z = ( 4 1 , 4 1 , 2 1 )
The displacement vector C 1 Y is ( 1 0 1 , 1 0 1 , − 5 1 ) . Using the distance formula, ( C 1 Y ) 2 = 5 0 1 a 2 + 5 0 1 b 2 − 1 0 0 1 c 2 = 2 0 1 7 2
Similarly, the distance ( Y X ) 2 = 2 0 0 9 a 2 + 2 0 0 9 b 2 − 4 0 0 9 c 2 = 4 9 ( 5 0 1 a 2 + 5 0 1 b 2 − 1 0 0 1 c 2 ) = 4 9 × 2 0 1 7 2
So X Y = ( 4 9 ( 2 0 1 7 2 ) ) = 2 6 0 5 1 . The answer is therefore 6 0 5 1 + 2 = 6 0 5 3
Woah, I didn't expect to see a barycentric coordinate approach to questions like this. I'm impressed!
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...