You study in a room with two lamps with the same intensity, , one closer from your desk and the other being further away. You replace one of them with a better lamp, with intensity that you just bought.
Considering the inverse square law, and knowing that your desk would have been less lit if the other lamp happened to be the one substituted, which one of the lamps has been replaced?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Consider two scenarios, one in which the dim lamp is close (Case 1), and the other in which the dim lamp is far (Case 2). By assumption, I > i .
Let us consider the distances D > d > 0 . From the inverse square law, we know that the amount of light recieved by the desk is of the form L = k r 2 i , where L is the amount of light, k is some positive proportionality constant, i is the intensity of the source and r is the distance from the source.
Therefore, the amount of light the desk recieved in the first case is L 1 = k d 2 i + k D 2 I = k ( d 2 i + D 2 I ) . Similarly, the light the desk recieved in the second case is is L 2 = k ( d 2 I + D 2 i ) .
If we assume that L 1 ≥ L 2 , then
k ( d 2 I + D 2 i ) ≤ k ( d 2 i + D 2 I )
⇒ d 2 I + D 2 i ≤ d 2 i + D 2 I
Multiplying both sides by D 2 d 2 yields
⇒ I D 2 + i d 2 ≤ I d 2 + i D 2
⇒ I ( D 2 − d 2 ) ≤ i ( D 2 − d 2 )
∴ I ≤ i
which contradicts our assumption that I > i . Therefore it is the case that L 2 > L 1 . In other words, the dimmer lamp is farther away, and the lamp that has been replaced is the one closer to the desk.