This closed curve satisfies the equation 1 − ∣ x ∣ + 1 − ∣ y ∣ = 1 . It looks much like the unit circle but is a little bulgier. Not surprisingly, the circumference C of this curve is slightly greater than that of the unit circle.
By what percent is this circumference greater than that of the unit circle? In other words, what is 2 π C − 2 π × 1 0 0 ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Nice solution, but actually the expression of x ( u ) , y ( u ) is ( 2 1 ± u ) 2 − 1 , so that 1 − x + 1 − y becomes indeed equal to 1 .
It doesn't make a difference in the solution because it disappears when you differentiate with respect to u , but just to make it correct.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
We will determine the path length of the quarter in the first quadrant, with x , y ≥ 0 . For the sake of symmetry, I parametrize the curve as u ∈ [ − 1 , + 1 ] , and set x ( u ) , y ( u ) = 1 − ( 2 1 ± u ) 2 . (The positive sign gives the x -coordinate, the negative sign the y -coordinate.)
Then d u d x , d u d y = − 2 u ± 1 ; the infinitesimal path length when traveling along the curve over an increment d u is d s = ( d x ) 2 + ( d y ) 2 = 2 1 ( u + 1 ) 2 + ( u − 1 ) 2 d u = 2 u 2 + 1 . Integrating this over an interval u ∈ [ a , b ] , we get s a → b = 2 1 ∫ a b u 2 + 1 = 2 2 1 [ u 1 + u 2 + ln ( u + 1 + u 2 ) ] a b . Substituting [ a , b ] = [ − 1 , 1 ] , we get for one quarter curve (note that ln ( 2 − 1 ) = − ln ( 2 + 1 ) ) s = 1 + 2 ln ( 1 + 2 ) , . and for the entire circumference C = 4 s = 4 + 2 2 ln ( 1 + 2 ) ≈ 6 . 4 9 2 9 0 1 . Comparing to the circumference of the unit circle, C ∘ = 2 π , C ∘ C ≈ 6 . 2 8 3 1 8 5 6 . 4 9 2 9 0 1 ≈ 1 . 0 3 3 3 7 7 , showing that the circumference is 3 . 3 3 7 % greater than that of the unit circle.