U-tube

Initially, the U-tube shown above is filled with water, and the level on each side is 0 = 5 cm . \ell_0 = \SI{5}{\centi\meter}. After some oil is poured on side A , A, the level on that side becomes L A = 7.3 cm . L_A = \SI{7.3}{\centi\meter}.

What is L B L_B ( ( in cm ) ? \si{\centi\meter})?

Assume that the water and oil do not mix, and that their densities are related by ρ oil = 0.85 ρ water . \rho_\textrm{oil} = 0.85\rho_\textrm{water}.


The answer is 6.7.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

6 solutions

Ahmed Almubarak
Oct 28, 2017

After adding amount of oil the pressure effected by the oil column will be divided equally to the both sides, so the pressure in the side B will be the original pressure plus half of pressure effected by oil column. let X = oil column.

Pressure in both sides are equal and pressure = high * density * g (As g is the gravity constant and i will remove it from the calculations as it is equal in both sides)

Pr at A = Pr at B

X 0.85 + ( 7.3 X ) 1 = 5 1 + 0.5 X 0.85 X * 0.85 + ( 7.3 - X ) * 1 = 5 * 1 + 0.5 * X * 0.85

X = 4 X = 4

The required length = new pressure at B / water density

= ( 5 1 + 0.5 X 0.85 ) / 1 = 6.7 (5 * 1 + 0.5 * X * 0.85)/1 = \boxed {6.7}

This isn't related to what you did, but I answered with 6.861 and it counted it as correct. I calculated it as this:

Both columns must have the same mass. But since the oil is 15% less dense, it will require 15% more volume of oil to achieve the same mass as x amount of water. I took off 15% of the length of column A to find the length of column B.

I now saw that I approached very incorectly, as column A is not all oil, as you would assume from the way I set it up. I'm still very confused as to why it counted as correct. Although it is still actuate when rounded, it's still a mistake, and would end up growing to be very large with a scaled up version of this problem.

Cole Goodman - 3 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

density of oil must be given accurately to solve the problem

Gumperla Krishnamurthy - 3 years, 6 months ago

Now, this is very common mistake. If you decrease density 15% and increase volume 15%, mass will not remain the same! Here is why: 0.85 ρ 1.15 V = 0.9775 ρ V 0.85\rho\cdot 1.15 V = 0.9775 \rho V so mass decreased 2.25%. Percentage is not additive! +15% and -15% do not give 0%. This is because +15% is actually disguised multiplication by 1.15 and -15% is disguised multiplication by 0.85, which together give 0.9775 or -2.25%. Inverse of -15% is 1 / 0.85 1.17647 1/0.85 \approx 1.17647 or \approx +17.65%.

Denis Husadzic - 3 years, 5 months ago
Chew-Seong Cheong
Nov 20, 2017

Let the column of oil be l 2 l_2 , the column of water under the column oil be l 1 l_1 in the left arm and the column of water above l 1 l_1 in the right arm be l 3 = L B l 1 l_3 = L_B - l_1 .

Since the volume of water is the same before and after the oil is poured in, assuming the cross-sectional area of the U-tube is uniform throughout, we have l 1 + L B = 2 l 0 = 10 . . . ( 1 ) l_1+L_B = 2 l_0 = 10 \ ... (1) .

By Newton's third law , the weight of l 2 l_2 of oil equals to the weight of l 3 l_3 of water. Therefore, ρ oil l 2 g = ρ water l 3 g \rho_{\text{oil}}l_2 g = \rho_{\text{water}}l_3 g , where ρ \rho denotes the density of the subscribed liquid and g g the acceleration due to gravity. This implies that l 3 = ρ oil ρ water l 2 = 0.85 l 2 . . . ( 2 ) l_3 = \dfrac {\rho_{\text{oil}}}{\rho_{\text{water}}}l_2 = 0.85 l_2 \ ... (2) .

We also note that l 1 + l 2 = L A = 7.3 . . . ( 3 ) l_1 + l_2 = L_A = 7.3 \ ...(3) .

Then we have:

( 1 ) : l 1 + L B = 10 Note that l 1 + l 3 = L B 2 l 1 + l 3 = 10 And ( 2 ) : l 3 = 0.85 l 2 2 l 1 + 0.85 l 2 = 10 . . . ( 4 ) \begin{aligned} (1): \quad l_1+ {\color{#3D99F6}L_B} & = 10 & \small \color{#3D99F6} \text{Note that }l_1+l_3 = L_B \\ 2l_1 + {\color{#3D99F6}l_3} & = 10 & \small \color{#3D99F6} \text{And }(2): \ l_3 = 0.85 l_2 \\ 2l_1 + {\color{#3D99F6}0.85 l_2} & = 10 \quad ...(4) \end{aligned}

{ 2 × ( 3 ) : 2 l 1 + 2 l 2 = 14.6 ( 4 ) : 2 l 1 + 0.85 l 2 = 10 \begin{cases} 2\times (3): & 2l_1 + 2l_2 & = 14.6 \\ (4): & 2l_1 + 0.85 l_2 & = 10 \end{cases}

2 × ( 3 ) ( 4 ) : 1.15 l 2 = 4.6 l 2 = 4.6 1.15 = 4 \begin{aligned} 2\times (3)-(4): 1.15l_2 & = 4.6 & \implies l_2 = \frac {4.6}{1.15} = 4 \end{aligned}

( 3 ) : l 1 + 4 = 7.3 l 1 = 7.3 4 = 3.3 \begin{aligned} (3): \quad l_1 + 4 & = 7.3 & \implies l_1 = 7.3-4 = 3.3 \end{aligned}

( 1 ) : 3.3 + L B = 10 L B = 10 3.3 = 6.7 \begin{aligned} (1): \quad 3.3 + L_B & = 10 & \implies L_B = 10-3.3 = \boxed{6.7} \end{aligned}

2L2 + L3 = 10 ---- Do you mean 2L1 + L3 = 10?

Prateek Kc - 3 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Yes, thanks.

Chew-Seong Cheong - 3 years, 6 months ago

how did you get L2 = 4 and L1 = 3.3? I am confused how you went from (1) to (2) in the second half of your reasoning. Could you please elaborate?

Matthew Agona - 3 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

I have added in the calculation steps. They are very simple. There is no relation between (1) and (2). I have separated them in paragraph.

Chew-Seong Cheong - 3 years, 6 months ago
Kevin Tong
Nov 22, 2017

The fluid pressure on both sides would be equal for the fluid to settle. Let's assume the height of the water on the left side is x x , then x ρ w a t e r g + ( 7.3 x ) ρ o i l g = ( 10 x ) ρ w a t e r g x + ( 7.3 x ) 0.85 = 10 x x + ( 7.3 0.85 ) 0.85 x = 10 x 1.15 x = 10 6.205 x = 3.3 L B = 10 x = 6.7 \begin{aligned}&x\rho_{water}g+(7.3-x)\rho_{oil}g=(10-x)\rho_{water}g \\ &x+(7.3-x)\cdot 0.85 = 10-x \\ &x+(7.3\cdot 0.85)-0.85x=10-x \\ &1.15x=10-6.205 \\ &x=3.3 \implies L_B=10-x=\boxed{6.7} \end{aligned}

It would be highly appreciated if you could explain the Rhs ..

Neetu Bala - 3 years, 6 months ago

Log in to reply

Would this be the rhs of the first of the step?

Kevin Tong - 3 years, 6 months ago
James Haynes
Nov 22, 2017

Didn't know how to solve it, but I figured the fluids would equalize so that weight of the column of fluid in A was equal to the column of fluid in B.

Writing out the equation of A-Weight = B-Weight you find that the area and density cancel out leaving you Water-Height-A + 0.85 Oil-Height = Water-Height-B.

You know that the water volume or container volume hasn't changed so Water-Height-A + Water-Height-B = 10cm. You also were given that Water-Height-A + Oil-Height = 7.3cm.

After substitution until only Oil-Height and constants remain, you find it to be 6.7cm.

Vinay Saketh
Nov 23, 2017

length of water decreased in left tube = b; intial length of water in left tube =a; length of oil poured =c; L and K are lengths of left and right side of the tube after oil is poured;

L=a-b+c------------(1); K=a+b--------------(2); adding 1 and 2, we get; L+K=2a+c-----------(3); The relation between c and a in densities is c=0.85a; substituting the same in 3 we get; K=2.8c-L=14-7.3; K=6.7 ;

Syrous Marivani
Nov 23, 2017

(5 – x) ρ w a t e r \rho_{water} + (2.3 + x) ρ o i l \rho_{oil} = (5 + x) ρ w a t e r \rho_{water}

5 – x + (2.3 + x)0.85 = 5 + x

1.15x = 2.3 x 0.85, x = 1.9 cm; so L_B = 5 + 1.9 = 6.9 = 69E-1.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...