Under the cube root

Find the largest positive integer x x such that x x is divisible by all the positive integers at most equal to x 3 \sqrt[3]{x} .


The answer is 420.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

John Gilling
May 31, 2015

I figured a a few times wrongly on this one before getting it correct; a very interesting problem that I am still having trouble proving!

For any such x N x \in \mathbb{N} , we must have that the least common multiple of the set of numbers { 1 , , x 3 } \{1, \dots, \left \lfloor{\sqrt[3]{x}}\right \rfloor\} , call it λ \lambda , divides x x . Note that λ \lambda is constant on the intervals between the perfect cube numbers.

After running some pretty convincing numerical results, I found that λ > x \lambda > x for x 8 3 = 512 x \geq 8^{3} = 512 , thus contradicting λ x \lambda \mid x . It would then follow that the interval [ 343 , 512 ] [343, 512] , where λ = 420 \lambda = 420 , would contain our maximum value x = 420 x = 420 .

In order to rigorously prove the numerical claim, I'd like to find a way to describe the growth of λ \lambda . It is a piecewise constant function of x x , with discontinuities at each x = p 3 n x = p^{3n} , where n N n \in \mathbb{N} and p p is prime. Below are the graphs of y = λ ( x ) y = \lambda(x) in blue and y = x y = x in red (with logarithmic scaling for both functions on the y-axis).

Domain is [ 0 , 10 ] [0,10] :

Domain is [ 0 , 20 ] [0,20] :

Domain is [ 0 , 50 ] [0,50] :

The "accumulated lcm" is apparently growing much quicker than the identity function, but it seems like proving this would have something to do with the distribution of the primes over N \mathbb{N} . If someone could give me a gentle hint in the right direction, that would be lovely!

Moderator note:

Let's push your current ideas even further. For clarity, define λ x = L C M ( 1 , 2 , , x 3 ) \lambda_x = LCM (1, 2, \ldots , \lfloor \sqrt[3]{x} \rfloor ) .

Suppose there exists an x 512 x \geq 512 such that λ x x \lambda_x \mid x .
Since x 512 x \geq 512 , this implies that λ 8 x \lambda_8 \mid x , so 840 x 840 \mid x and thus x 840 x \geq 840 .
Since x 840 x \geq 840 , this implies that λ 9 x \lambda_9 \mid x , so 2520 x 2520 \mid x and thus x 2520 x \geq 2520 .
Since x 2520 x \geq 2520 , this implies that λ 13 x \lambda_{13} \mid x , so 360360 x 360360 \mid x and thus x 360360 x \geq 360360 .
We would like for this to continue. For that to happen, we need additional primes, or prime powers, that that will occur in the gap of 2520 3 \sqrt[3]{2520} to 360360 3 \sqrt[3] { 360360} , so on and so forth.


Hint: Bertrand's postulate states that there is a prime number between n n and 2 n 2n .

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...