Union Functions

Let ( f i ) i I (f_i)_{i \in I} be a family of functions such that, i I , f i : A i B i \forall i\in I, f_i:A_i \mapsto B_i . Is for every family, i I f i \displaystyle \bigcup_{i\in I} f_i a function?

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

No, it isn't. Here is an exemple of the falsity of these proposition: Consider f 1 = { ( 1 , 1 ) , ( 2 , 2 ) } f_1=\{(1,1),(2,2)\} and f 2 = { ( 1 , 2 ) , ( 2 , 2 ) } f_2=\{(1,2),(2,2)\} . It is clear that i { 1 , 2 } f i = { ( 1 , 1 ) , ( 2 , 2 ) , ( 1 , 2 ) , ( 2 , 2 ) } \bigcup_{i\in\{1,2\}} f_i =\{(1,1),(2,2),(1,2),(2,2)\} . In this context we have that ( 1 , 1 ) i { 1 , 2 } f i (1,1)\in \bigcup_{i\in\{1,2\}} f_i and ( 1 , 2 ) i { 1 , 2 } f i (1,2)\in \bigcup_{i\in\{1,2\}} f_i , so i { 1 , 2 } f i \bigcup_{i\in\{1,2\}} f_i is not a function.

As an addition to this solution, we can note that if all the A i A_i 's are pairwise disjoint, then the union of the functions is indeed a function.

Prasun Biswas - 5 years ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...