Uniquely Awesome

n + n 2 + n 3 + n 4 = ( n + 2 ) ! \large{{\color{#3D99F6}n}{\color{#D61F06}+}{\color{#3D99F6}n}^{\color{#20A900}2}{\color{#D61F06}+}{\color{#3D99F6}n}^{\color{#20A900}3}{ \color{#D61F06}+}{\color{#3D99F6}n}^{\color{#20A900}4} = {\color{#EC7300}(}{\color{#3D99F6}n}{\color{#D61F06}+}{\color{#D61F06}2}{\color{#EC7300})}{\color{#624F41}!}}

What integer value of n n satisfies the equation above?


The answer is 3.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

12 solutions

Gamal Sultan
Apr 15, 2015

The given equation can be put in the form :

n (n + 1) (n^2 + 1) =(n - 1)! (n + 2)(n + 1)(n)

(n - 1)! = (n^2 + 1) / (n + 2) = (n - 2) + 5 / (n + 2)

Then

5 / (n + 2) must be an integer

So

n + 2 = 1 ............... i e n = -1 (refused)

Or

n + 2 = 5 .............. i e n = 3

Moderator note:

Nicely done. But for the sake of clarity, you should show that n + 2 n+2 must be of value(s) ± 1 , ± 5 \pm 1, \pm 5 and explain why 3 values are refused.

Adarsh Kumar
Apr 14, 2015

Start by factoring the given expression,after you are done you would have got: [ n ( 1 + n 2 ) ( 1 + n ) ] = ( n + 2 ) ! ( n 2 + 1 ) = ( n + 2 ) ( n 1 ) ! ( cancelling ’n’ and ’(n+1)’from L.H.S and R.H.S) n 2 + 1 n 1 = ( n + 2 ) ( n 2 ) ! = an integer ( n 1 ) ( n 2 + 1 ) ( n 1 ) n ( n 1 ) + n + 1 ( n 1 ) ( n + 1 ) ( n 1 ) ( n 1 ) + 2 ( n 1 ) 2 [n(1+n^2)(1+n)]=(n+2)!\\ \Longrightarrow (n^2+1)=(n+2)(n-1)!(\text{cancelling 'n' and '(n+1)'from L.H.S and R.H.S)}\\\Longrightarrow \dfrac{n^2+1}{n-1}=(n+2)(n-2)!=\text{an integer}\\ \Longrightarrow (n-1)|(n^2+1)\\ \Longrightarrow (n-1)|n(n-1)+n+1\\ \Longrightarrow (n-1)|(n+1)\\ \Longrightarrow (n-1)|(n-1)+2\\ \Longrightarrow (n-1)|2 After checking all the possible cases,only 3 3 satisfies the given conditions.

Moderator note:

This solution has been marked wrong. You have only shown that n n must be odd. However you did not show why n = 3 n=3 is the unique solution.

Jack Rawlin
Feb 16, 2016

n + n 2 + n 3 + n 4 = ( n + 2 ) ! n + n^2 + n^3 + n^4 = (n + 2)!

n 2 + n 3 + n 4 + n 5 = n ( n + 2 ) ! n^2 + n^3 + n^4 + n^5 = n(n + 2)!

( n + 2 ) ! n ( n + 2 ) ! = n n 5 (n + 2)! - n(n + 2)! = n - n^5

( 1 n ) ( n + 2 ) ! = n ( 1 n 4 ) (1 - n)(n + 2)! = n(1 - n^4)

( n + 2 ) ! = n ( 1 + n 2 ) ( 1 n 2 ) 1 n (n + 2)! = \frac{n(1 + n^2)(1 - n^2)}{1 - n}

( n + 2 ) ! = n ( 1 + n 2 ) ( 1 + n ) ( 1 n ) 1 n (n + 2)! = \frac{n(1 + n^2)(1 + n)(1 - n)}{1 - n}

( n + 2 ) ! = n ( n + 1 ) ( n 2 + 1 ) (n + 2)! = n(n + 1)(n^2 + 1)

( n + 2 ) ( n + 1 ) n ( n 1 ) ! = n ( n + 1 ) ( n 2 + 1 ) (n + 2)(n + 1)n(n - 1)! = n(n + 1)(n^2 + 1)

( n + 2 ) ( n 1 ) ! = n 2 + 1 (n + 2)(n - 1)! = n^2 + 1

( n 1 ) ! = n 2 + 1 n + 2 (n - 1)! = \frac{n^2 + 1}{n + 2}

( n 1 ) ! = ( n 2 + 1 ) + ( 4 4 ) n + 2 (n - 1)! = \frac{(n^2 + 1) + (4 - 4)}{n + 2}

( n 1 ) ! = ( n 2 4 ) + ( 4 + 1 ) n + 2 (n - 1)! = \frac{(n^2 - 4) + (4 + 1)}{n + 2}

( n 1 ) ! = ( n 2 ) ( n + 2 ) + 5 n + 2 (n - 1)! = \frac{(n - 2)(n + 2) + 5}{n + 2}

( n 1 ) ! = ( n 2 ) + 5 n + 2 (n - 1)! = (n - 2) + \frac{5}{n + 2}


n n is an integer ( n + 2 ) \therefore (n + 2) is also an integer. 5 n + 2 \frac{5}{n + 2} is also an integer.


n + 2 = 5 , 1 , 1 , 5 n = 7 , 3 , 1 , 3 n + 2 = -5,~ -1,~ 1,~ 5 \rightarrow n = -7,~ -3,~ -1,~ 3


The factorial function is defined for all non-negative integers:

( n 1 ) 0 n 1 (n - 1) \geq 0 \therefore n \geq 1


n = 3 n = 3

3 + 3 2 + 3 3 + 3 4 = ( 3 + 2 ) ! 3 + 3^2 + 3^3 + 3^4 = (3 + 2)!

120 = 120 120 = 120

n = 3 \large \boxed{n = 3}

Vibhu Banka
Apr 20, 2015

Hence, the result has to be "n=3"

Okay, so first let's write the right hand side in a more suitable way:

n + n 2 + n 3 + n 4 = ( n + n 2 ) + n 2 ( n + n 2 ) = ( n + n 2 ) ( 1 + n 2 ) = n ( n + 1 ) ( n 2 + 1 ) n + n^{2} + n^{3} + n^{4} = (n + n^{2}) + n^{2}*(n + n^{2}) = (n + n^{2})*(1 + n^{2}) = n*(n + 1)*(n^2 + 1)

From this, divide both sides by the product n ( n + 1 ) ( n + 2 ) n*(n+1)*(n+2)

We then get:

n 2 + 1 n + 2 = ( n 1 ) ! \frac{n^{2} + 1}{n + 2} = (n - 1)!

The left hand side is an integer, and so must be the right hand side. Let's once more re-write the left hand side in a more suitable fashion:

n 2 + 1 n + 2 = n 2 + 2 n 2 n 4 + 4 + 1 n + 2 = n ( n + 2 ) 2 ( n + 2 ) + 5 n + 2 ( n 2 ) + 5 n + 2 \frac{n^{2} + 1}{n + 2} = \frac{n^{2} + 2n - 2n - 4 + 4 + 1}{n + 2} = \frac{n*(n+2) - 2(n + 2) + 5}{n + 2} \rightarrow (n -2) + \frac{5}{n + 2}

Rearranging the equation, we get:

5 n + 2 = ( n 1 ) ! ( n 2 ) \frac{5}{n + 2} = (n-1)! - (n - 2)

The right hand side must still be an integer, and so must be the left hand side. Now, notice that the factorial function is only defined for non-negative integers; thus, from the original equation, we must have as a first condition: n + 2 0 n 2 n + 2 \geq 0 \rightarrow n \geq -2 .

Our second condition lies within the fact that n + 2 n + 2 must be a divisor of 5 5 - which we got from rearranging the terms - which means that n + 2 n + 2 has to be an element of the set ± 1 , ± 5 \pm 1, \pm 5 . From this, we derive that n belongs to the set 7 , 3 , 1 , 3 {-7, -3, -1, 3} .

Given both constraints, we have that n n is either 1 -1 or 3 3 . Let's test both possibilities.

For n = 1 n = -1 , we have: ( 1 ) + ( 1 ) 2 + ( 1 ) 3 + ( 1 ) 4 = ( ( 1 ) + 2 ) ! 1 + 1 1 + 1 = ( 1 ) ! 0 = 1 (-1) + (-1)^{2} + (-1)^{3} + (-1)^{4} = ((-1) + 2)! \rightarrow -1 + 1 - 1 + 1 = (1)! \rightarrow 0 = 1 , which is a false claim and therefore n = 1 n = -1 is not a valid solution.

For n = 3 n = 3 , we have: 3 + 3 2 + 3 3 + 3 4 = ( 3 + 2 ) ! 3 + 9 + 27 + 81 = 5 ! 120 = 120 3 + 3^{2} + 3^{3} + 3^{4} = (3 + 2)! \rightarrow 3 + 9 + 27 + 81 = 5! \rightarrow 120 = 120 which is true, and therefore not only n = 3 n = 3 is a solution, but also a unique one.

Santiago Solorza
Apr 15, 2015

The value of n is 3

3+9+27+81=(5)!

120=120

Moderator note:

This solution has been marked wrong. You have only shown that it works for n = 3 n=3 but you didn't show that it is the only solution.

I think that the question is to solve but not to prove .

A Former Brilliant Member - 6 years, 1 month ago
Timothy Vu
Apr 15, 2015

You assume that it is an odd integer and a prime because prime integers are odd numbers (as in different from the rest) so you take the first "odd" integer which ends up being 3 since 1 is not prime. It isn't brute force, it's merely being uniquely awesome.

Moderator note:

This solution has been marked wrong. Your assumption and reasoning made no sense. You have only shown that n n must be odd. However you did not show why n = 3 n=3 is the unique solution.

Navin Rajkumar
Apr 15, 2015

Moderator note:

This solution has been marked wrong. You have only shown that it works for n = 3 n=3 but you didn't show that it is the only solution.

Steven Bukoan
Apr 15, 2015

n + n^2 + n^3 + n^4 = (n + 2)!

n(1 + n + n^2 + n^3) = (n + 2)!

Factorise LHS and divide through by n;

1 + n + (n^2)(1 + n) = (n + 2)!/n

Further factorise LHS;

1 + n + (n^2)(1 + n) = (n^2 + 1)(n + 1)

For RHS; (n + 2)! = (n + 2)(n +1)(n)(n - 1)!

So; (n + 2)! / n = (n + 2)(n + 1)(n - 1)!

Then LHS = RHS is;

(n^2 + 1)(n + 1) = (n + 2)(n + 1)(n - 1)!

Cancel n + 1 off both sides gives;

(n^2 + 1) = (n + 2)(n - 1)!

Note; n^2 + 1 = n^2 - 4 +5

And; n^2 - 4 = (n + 2)(n - 2)

So (n^2 + 1) = (n + 2)(n - 1)! becomes;

(n + 2)(n - 2) + 5 = (n + 2)(n - 1)!

[(n + 2)(n - 2) + 5] / (n + 2) = (n - 1)!

n - 2 + [5 / (n + 2)] = (n - 1)!

Now; 5 / (n + 2) must be an integer

Let 5 / (n + 2) = k, k an integer

n = (5 / k) - 2

If n & k are integers, k must be; -5, 1, or 5 only.

Then; n = -3, 3, or - 1

Consider LHS; (n - 1)! ... Negative numbers give indefinite factorials; therefore n = -3 or -1 cannot be correct.

n = 3 is the correct solution.

Moderator note:

Great job! Small mistake: it should be "If n & k are integers, k must be; -5, -1, 1 or 5 only."

Siddharth Iyer
Apr 14, 2015

One can prove that for n>=4 there is no solution as RHS>LHS (not a hard problem) There is also no solution for n <=-3 as negative factorials are not defined. Testing -2,-1,0,1,2,3 gives 3 as the solution .

Moderator note:

This solution is incomplete. It is not obvious that "One can prove that for n>=4 there is no solution as RHS>LHS (not a hard problem)".

Wye Yew Ho
Apr 15, 2015

I just typed 3 because it seemed like the coolest answer.

Moderator note:

This solution has been marked wrong. What makes 3 3 the coolest answer?

Vaibhav Prasad
Apr 14, 2015

Simply start bashing and you'll finish at 3 \boxed{3}

Moderator note:

This solution is incomplete. You did not show any relevant working to obtain your answer. Nor did you explain why there is only one solution.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...