Once I read a magazine article about probability where the author stated there was an unlikely event. The probability was given as ( 1 − 1 0 − 2 1 ) 1 0 2 5 . This probability is pretty small but hard to get a handle on. It is, however, quite close to 1 0 − n , where n is an integer.
Give this integer.
Note: It is easy to find websites that can evaluate this expression. Please don't. The intention is that it be solved with nothing but a scientific calculator and BRILLIANT reasoning.
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Similar solution with @Jeremy Galvagni 's
( 1 − 1 0 − 2 1 ) 1 0 2 5 = ( 1 − 1 0 2 1 1 ) 1 0 4 ⋅ 1 0 2 1 ≈ x → ∞ lim ( 1 − x 1 ) 1 0 4 x = e − 1 0 4 = 1 0 − 1 0 4 lo g 1 0 e ≈ 1 0 − 4 3 4 3
Therefore, n = 4 3 4 3 .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
( 1 − x 1 ) x tends to e 1 as x increases. This x is very large. We can rewrite the expression as
( ( 1 − 1 0 − 2 1 ) 1 0 2 1 ) 1 0 4
and then the excellent approximation
( e 1 ) 1 0 0 0 0 = e − 1 0 0 0 0
My calculator can't handle this so I'll use a base 10 logarithm
lo g e − 1 0 0 0 0 = − 1 0 0 0 0 lo g e ≈ − 4 3 4 2 . 9 4 4 8 1 9
So the probability is very close to 1 0 − 4 3 4 3 and so n = 4 3 4 3