If real numbers x 1 , x 2 , … x 1 3 satisfy
i = 1 ∑ 1 3 x i = 2 i = 1 ∑ 1 3 i x i − i 2 ,
what is the value of x 1 3 ?
This problem is posed by Uzumaki N .
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Nicely done!
Make the substitution u i = x i − i 2 , equivalently x i = i 2 + u i 2 . Then the u i 's satisfy ∑ u i 2 − 2 i u i + u i 2 = ∑ ( u i − i ) 2 = 0 . It follows that ∀ i , u i = i , hence x 1 3 = 1 3 2 + 1 3 2 = 3 3 8
Nicely done: short and straight to the point!
A little misprint, see correction in the comments.
Minor correction: it's ∑ u i 2 − 2 i u i + i 2 in the second sentence.
Clever substitution. I'll definitely vote you up.
In the solution, will use the inequality 2 a b ≤ a 2 + b 2 , with the equality sign occurring if and only if a = b .
Now, for a fixed value of i , we have 2 i x i − i 2 ≤ i 2 + ( x i − i 2 ) = x i Thus adding all the terms corresponding to i = 1 to i = 1 3 would give
2 i = 1 ∑ 1 3 i x i − i 2 ≤ i = 1 ∑ 1 3 x i
The equality sign occurs if and only if i = x i − i 2 , for all i running from 1 to 1 3 . This means i 2 = x i − i 2 , or x i = 2 i 2 for all i from 1 to 1 3 .
Therefore x 1 3 = 2 ( 1 3 2 ) = 3 3 8
Nicely done!
Consider the general form i = 1 ∑ n x i = 2 i = 1 ∑ n i x i − i 2 = 0 . Moving all the terms to the LHS yields i = 1 ∑ n ( x i − 2 i x i − i 2 ) = i = 1 ∑ n ( x i − i 2 − i ) 2 = 0 , from which we can surmise that x i = 2 i 2 . Thus, we have that x 1 3 = 2 ⋅ 1 3 2 = 3 3 8 , as desired.
x 1 − 1 2 + 2 x 2 − 2 2 + 3 x 3 − 3 2 + . . . + 1 3 x 1 3 − 1 3 2 = 2 1 ( x 1 + x 2 + x 3 . . . + x 1 3 ) ⇒ 2 x 1 − 1 2 + 4 x 2 − 2 2 + . . . + 2 n x 1 3 − 1 3 2 = x 1 + x 2 + . . . + x 1 3 ⇒ x 1 + x 2 + . . . + x 1 3 − 2 x 1 − 1 2 − 4 x 2 − 2 2 − . . . − 2 6 x 1 3 − 1 3 2 = 0 ⇒ ( x 1 − 1 − 1 ) 2 + ( x 2 − 2 2 − 2 ) 2 + . . . + ( x 1 3 − 1 3 2 − 1 3 ) 2 = 0 \ we have: x 1 − 1 − 1 = 0 ⇒ x 1 − 1 = 1 ⇒ x 1 − 1 = 1 ⇒ x 1 = 2 x 2 − 2 2 − 2 = 0 ⇒ x 2 − 2 2 = 2 ⇒ x 2 − 2 2 = 4 ⇒ x 1 = 2 . 2 2 ⋮ x 1 3 − 1 3 2 − 1 3 = 0 ⇒ x 1 3 − 1 3 2 = 1 3 ⇒ x 1 3 − 1 3 2 = 1 3 2 ⇒ x 1 3 = 2 . 1 3 2 = 3 3 8
The quick and dirty way of getting at the answer to this one is to assume that if any sequence
x
1
,
x
2
,
.
.
.
x
1
3
to make this equality true, then
x
1
3
must be the answer. So, let
x
i
=
2
i
2
. Then this equality is obviously true. Thus,
x
i
=
2
(
1
3
)
2
=
3
3
8
.
Since, the 1 3 real numbers are independent of each other, and seperable from each other in terms of the corresponding 1 3 real nos.. Therefore, we can seperate out the entities corresponding to each of the 1 3 real nos. Since, we need to find x 1 3 , therefore, for the given expression, the expression corresponding only to x 1 3 and independent to other terms, can be written as x 1 3 = 2 × 1 3 × x 1 3 − 1 3 2 which can be further simplified into, ⇒ ( x 1 3 − 3 3 8 ) 2 = 0 Thus, giving the required values of x 1 3 as { 3 3 8 , 3 3 8 } . Hence, the required value of x 1 3 = 3 3 8
What you claim makes no sense actually. You simply mean i = 0 ∑ n x i = i = 0 ∑ n f ( x i ) implies x i = f ( x i ) for all i . That's obviously not true.
As an explicit counterexample, if n is even, take f ( x i ) = x i + ( − 1 ) i for all i , and if n is odd, take f ( x 1 ) = x 1 and f ( x i ) = x i + ( − 1 ) i for all i ∈ N > 1 .
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Note that we must have x i ≥ i 2 for all i > 0 . Then the AM-GM inequality gives 2 x i = 2 ( x i − i 2 ) + i 2 ≥ ( x i − i 2 ) i 2 = i x i − i 2 , or equivalently, x i ≥ 2 i x i − i 2 , with equality occurring if and only if i 2 = x i − i 2 , or x i = 2 i 2 . Therefore, the LHS sum is always at least as large as the RHS sum, except when x i = 2 i 2 for each i = 1 , 2 , … , 1 3 ; therefore, x 1 3 = 2 ( 1 3 ) 2 = 3 3 8 .