Very Small Physics

The wavelength of radio waves is about 1 m , \SI{1}{\meter}, while the wavelength of visible light is about 500 nm . \SI{500}{\nano \meter}. As the wavelength of the waves gets smaller, their energy gets larger.

When we look into a microscope, our eyes are detecting light waves scattered from the object we're looking at, just as a radar tower detects radio waves scattered from planes. But you can't see individual atoms with a microscope. This is because, as a rule, a wave won't scatter off an object much smaller than its wavelength. It would be like trying to track a speck of dust in the sky with a radar station.

Particle physicists use scattering to study subatomic particles a million times smaller than atoms.

What can we conclude about these scattering experiments?

Particle physics experiments must require very low energies (and large wavelengths) Particle physics experiments must require very high energies (and small wavelengths) Individual subatomic particles do not scatter waves

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

2 solutions

Blake Farrow Staff
May 29, 2018

The correct answer is particle physics experiments must require very high energies (and small wavelengths) , for this reason, as we probe more deeply into subatomic particles, we'll need to build higher energy particle accelerators . Small objects will only scatter waves with very small wavelengths which must have high energies.

Light Microscopes

A light microscope is useful for discerning features down to about half the wavelength of the light used (usually around 500 nm \SI{500}{\nano \meter} light, with a photon energy of about 2.5 eV \SI{2.5}{\eV} ). For visible light microscopes, this means that the smallest possible scatter sources (or objects) are about 250 nm \approx \SI{250}{\nano \meter} . Biologists have come up with very clever ways to improve this limit, but it's unlikely that visible light microscopes will ever be feasible for observing features less than ~10 nanometers in size.

A photo of a cell taken with a super resolution fluorescence microscope. A photo of a cell taken with a super resolution fluorescence microscope.

Photons

A single wavelength of light is composed of photons with a momentum related to their wavelength by the relation:

λ = h p = h c E \lambda = \frac{h}{p} = \frac{h c}{E}

The smaller the wavelength of light, the higher the momentum (and the energy!). The electromagnetic spectrum extends from X-rays with very small wavelengths, to ultraviolet and visible light with intermediate wavelengths, to microwaves and radio waves with long wavelengths. The energy contained in a visible light photon is much less than an X-ray photon, and much more than a microwave or radio wave photon.

X-Rays

Since the energies of X-rays are so high ( E 10 keV E \approx \SI{10}{\kilo \eV} ), their wavelengths are very small ( λ 0.1 nm \lambda \approx \SI{0.1}{\nano \meter} ). X-rays will scatter off of much smaller objects than visible light. For example, X-rays are commonly used for crystallography, where an intense beam of x-ray photons scatter off of every atom in a molecule. By collecting the scattered x-rays, we can take a snapshot of a protein and record the position of every scattering source. For x-rays, the scattering sources are single atoms, and X-ray crystallography can determine the position of every atom in complex molecules like proteins to extreme accuracy.
The crystal structure of a protein, each sphere represents a single atom The crystal structure of a protein, each sphere represents a single atom

Electrons

But quantum physics tells us that light isn't the only thing that behaves like a particle with a wavelength. Ordinary matter like protons, neutrons, and electrons also have wavelengths. And since they are massive and have a high momentum/energy, they also tend to have very small wavelengths according to the same equation:

λ = h p = h 2 m E \lambda = \frac{h}{p} = \frac{h}{\sqrt{2 m E}}

Fast electrons can have very high energies ( E 100 keV E \geq \SI{100}{\kilo \eV} ) and tiny wavelengths ( λ 5 pm \lambda \leq \SI{5}{\pico \meter} ). Electron microscopes can take images of molecules and track down the position of each atom: The structure of a virus, captured with an electron microscope The structure of a virus, captured with an electron microscope

Particle beams

To probe systems even smaller than atoms and molecules, we need to make extremely high momentum particles that have correspondingly low wavelengths. This was first performed with beams of alpha particles , made up of two neutrons and two protons. Rutherford shot a beam of alpha particles at a thin piece of gold foil. Most of the alpha particles went straight through, but some scattered off something in the gold. The particles weren't scattering off the atoms, but off the nuclei , many thousands of times smaller than the radius of the atom, and this was the first high energy particle physics experiment to probe subatomic particles.

Rutherford's gold foil experiment Rutherford's gold foil experiment

Rutherford's experiment showed that atoms were mostly empty space, with tiny scattering centers at the center of each atom. This could only be performed since alpha particles have such high energies, and small wavelengths ( E 1 MeV E \geq \SI{1}{\mega \eV} and λ 10 fm \lambda \leq \SI{10}{\femto \meter} ).

Today, alpha particle beams can even be used as microscopes.

Particle Accelerators

To make extremely tiny wavelength and high energy particle beams, physicists accelerate particles (like electrons, protons, and even Lead ions) close to the speed of light. These accelerated ions can have E 1 TeV E \geq \SI{1}{\tera \eV} and wavelengths λ 1 × 1 0 18 m \lambda \leq \SI{1E-18}{ \meter} . Small enough to scatter off of quarks, the subatomic particles that make up protons and neutrons in the nuclei of atoms.

A proton is made up of three bound quarks A proton is made up of three bound quarks

As physicists probe even deeper into the subatomic realm, they've had to build higher and higher energy (and lower and lower wavelength) experiments.

Usually I've seen wavelengths referred to as short or long but you've used the words small and low . Was this a conscious choice and what are you trying to convey by word usage?

Jeremy Galvagni - 3 years ago

Log in to reply

Interesting note, Jeremy. I don't have anything specific that I am trying to convey with this word usage. Where I use small to describe wavelength, you can equivalently use short .

Blake Farrow Staff - 3 years ago

I was always wondering how electrons are accelerated to such a high speeds? In school, we learned that, generally, charged particles are accelerated by strong electric or magnetic field, but I guess that's not enough to achieve something near speed of light, or it is?

Uros Stojkovic - 2 years, 12 months ago

Log in to reply

Moving charged particles are affected by magnetic fields, but magnetic fields cannot be used to accelerate them, they cause the charges to follow a circular trajectory.

An electric field would work. In order to get an electron to 90% of the speed of light, 661 kV would be needed. To get to 99% of the speed of light, 3.11 MV. Though these are not everyday voltages, in principle accelerating an electron to near the speed of light is really as simple as applying this voltage difference between 2 plates with a hole in the center, and releasing the electrons from one such hole. Of course, a vacuum would be required to avoid collisions of the electrons with gas molecules, which would cause them to lose energy in each collision.

However, in practice especially for heavier particles, typically many small pushes are used instead of one such big push. A relatively simple example of a "compact" device allowing this, is a cyclotron . A magnetic field is used to bend the trajectories, and each half-rotation the particles are accelerated using an electric field.

Roland van Vliembergen - 2 years, 12 months ago

Too bad i dropped physics in my first year of high school , most of this seems Greek to me...

Josmik j - 2 years, 12 months ago

I disagree with the problem statement. I have seen photos of where individual atoms have been photographed.

Dennis Rodman - 2 years, 8 months ago

Log in to reply

Individual atoms can be imaged using a variety of microscopes, but none of them do the imaging using light waves. The images you've seen are likely taken by an electron microscope which uses very high energy electrons (with very small wavelengths) to extract atomic detail. The best atomic-resolution "microscopes" actually image using a tiny tip like the one on a record player, which records the texture of a molecule or surface (AFM or STM, give these a google).

Blake Farrow Staff - 2 years, 8 months ago
Michael Mendrin
Jun 11, 2018

Compact Muon Detector at CERN Large Hadron Collider, where high energies and small wavelengths MEET

Amazing, one of science best inventions to create anti-matter

Xavier Siah - 2 years, 12 months ago

I thought it was all about probability in the subatomic world, if you see it you can't measure it.

Gian Paolo Baranzoni - 2 years, 12 months ago

Log in to reply

It is really all about probability in the subatomic world. But it turns out that only what's called "conjugate quantities" in quantum physics are probabilistic, in that knowing too much about one reduces how much one can know about the other. Mass is not one of those quantities, so it can be measured to a high degree of accuracy.

Michael Mendrin - 2 years, 12 months ago

Please participate in my Question Game here

Ram Mohith - 2 years, 12 months ago

This picture was phenomenal to me. I have never heard of all this and so I looked it all up. You have introduced me to w whole new world. Thank you.

D Paulsen - 2 years, 11 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...