There exists an integer triplet with such that
Find the value of
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
3 x 3 + y 3 + z 3 = x y z + 2 1
x 3 + y 3 + z 3 − 3 x y z = 6 3
We can factor the right side as follows: ( x + y + z ) ( x 2 + y 2 + z 2 − x y − y z − z x ) = ( x + y + z ) ( ( x + y + z ) 2 − 3 ( x y + y z + z x ) ) We know that x + y + z is a factor of 63. x + y + z cannot be 1 or 3, because then the other factor is less than 63. x + y + z cannot be 7, because then the second factor would have to be 9; however, the second factor is not divisible by 3. x + y + z cannot be 9, because then the other factor is divisible by 3, which it cannot be. Now, let's see when x + y + z = 2 1 . Then, ( x + y + z ) 2 − 3 ( x y + y z + z x ) = 3 , meaning that x y + y z + z x = 1 4 6 .
By AM-GM, x y + y z + z x ≤ ( 2 x + y ) 2 + ( 2 y + z ) 2 + ( 2 z + x ) 2 = ( 2 2 1 − z ) 2 + ( 2 2 1 − x ) 2 + ( 2 2 1 − y ) 2 ≤ ( 2 2 1 − 7 ) 2 + ( 2 2 1 − 7 ) 2 + ( 2 2 1 − 7 ) 2 = 1 4 7
There is a chance that we can get x y + y z + z x = 1 4 6 if we choose ( x , y , z ) close to ( 7 , 7 , 7 ) . Trying ( x , y , z ) = ( 8 , 7 , 6 ) we see that it works. ⟹ x = 8 .