Well formulated formula?

Logic Level 1

According to propositional logic , which of the following is not a well formulated formula?

(1): ( A B ) ( C D ) A \wedge B) \to (C \vee D)
(2): ( A ¬ B ) ( C D ) A \neg B) \to (C \vee D)
(3): ( A B ) ( ¬ D ) A \leftrightarrow B) \to (\neg D)

None of them 3 1 2 and 3 All of them 1 and 2 2 1 and 3

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Geoff Pilling
Jan 29, 2017

A proposition is called a "well formed formula" (or wff) if it is constructed with the following set of rules:

  1. Any atomic proposition is a well formed formula.
  2. If A A is a well formed formula, then ¬ A \neg A is also a well formed formula.
  3. If A A and B B are well formed formulae, then ( A B ) (A \wedge B) is also a well formed formula.
  4. If A A and B B are well formed formulae, then ( A B ) (A \vee B) is also a well formed formula.
  5. If A A and B B are well formed formulae, then ( A B ) (A \to B) is also a well formed formula.
  6. If A A and B B are well formed formulae, then ( A B ) (A \leftrightarrow B) is also a well formed formula. _\square
  7. Unless constructed using only 1-6 above, then a proposition isn't a well formed formula.

In the three choices above, 1 1 and 3 3 can be constructed using the above requirements for a wff. However, 2 2 is nonsense, since ¬ \neg is a unary operator so A ¬ B A \neg B is nonsense.

Therefore, 2 \boxed2 is the right answer.

None of them are well formed formula because the outer parenthesis is missing - ((A∧B)→(C∨D)) is a well formed formula but (A∧B)→(C∨D) isn't

tor mata - 6 months ago

2 is the right answer but in the exercise 1 and 3 is the right answer

Miquel Seixas da Paixao - 1 month, 3 weeks ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...