Ironic Isn't It?

a b = c d = e f = g h = i j = k l \large a^b = c^d = e^f = g^h = i^j = k^l

For distinct positive integers, a , b , c , d , e , f , g , h , i , j , k , l a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l with a a being the largest, the above equation is satisfied. What is the smallest possible value of a a ?


The answer is 64.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Pi Han Goh
Mar 5, 2015

Let a b = c d = e f = g h = i j = k l = M a^b = c^d = e^f = g^h = i^j = k^l = M for some positive integer M M .

The value of M M must be in the form of m n m^n , so a = m n / b , c = m n / d , , k = m n / l a = m^{n/b}, c = m^{n/d} , \ldots, k = m^{n/l}

And because a , c , e , g , i , k a,c,e,g,i,k are distinct, m 2 m \geq 2 with a a greater than c , e , g , i , k c,e,g,i,k implies n / b 6 min ( a ) = 2 6 = 64 n/b \geq 6 \Rightarrow \min (a) = 2^6 = 64

By finding the lowest common multiple: lcm ( 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ) = 2 2 × 3 × 5 = 60 \text{lcm}(1,2,3,4,5) = 2^2 \times 3 \times 5 = 60 , we have d = 60 , f = 30 , h = 20 , j = 15 , k = 12 d = 60, f = 30, h = 20, j = 15, k = 12 . And a b = c d 6 4 b = 2 60 b = 10 a^b = c^d \Rightarrow 64^b = 2^{60} \Rightarrow b = 10 which satisfy the constraint above. Hence a = 64 a = \boxed{64}

We hope to find x > 6 x > 6 with lcm ( x , 6 , 5 , 4 , 3 , 2 , 1 ) 60 \text{lcm} (x,6,5,4,3,2,1) \geq 60 , but trial and error shows this is the bare minimum, so the equation is indeed minimized.

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...