An Inverse Inequality

Calculus Level 2

Let f ( x ) = x 3 + a x 2 + b x + c f(x) = x^3 + ax^2 + bx + c , where a , b a, b , and c c are real numbers . In order for f ( x ) f(x) to be invertible, a a and b b must be related as: a m b n p \dfrac{a^m}{b^n} \leq p , where m , n m, n , and p p are also real numbers.

Find the mimimum value of m + n + p m + n + p .


The answer is 6.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

M M
Jun 16, 2016

The Calculus approach:

Note that in order for a cubic function to be invertible, it must either be monotonically increasing or monotonically decreasing. It can have no local minima or maxima, only a single inflection point.This means that f ( x ) 0 f'(x) \geq 0 or f ( x ) 0 f'(x) \leq 0 for x R x \in \mathbb{R}

Note that f ( x ) = 3 x 2 + 2 a x + b f'(x) = 3x^2 + 2ax + b , which is a quadratic. This quadratic can have at most one root, which means its discriminant must be less than or equal to 0.

Therefore,

( 2 a ) 2 4 ( 3 ) ( b ) 0 (2a)^2 - 4 (3) (b) \leq 0

4 a 2 4 ( 3 ) ( b ) 0 4a^2 - 4 (3) (b) \leq 0

a 2 3 b 0 a^2 - 3b \leq 0

a 2 3 b a^2 \leq 3b

a 2 b 3 \frac{a^2}{b} \leq 3

2 + 1 + 3 = 6.

A purely algebraic approach is forthcoming but more of a pain. The approach I personally would take is finding the vertex (h,k) in terms of a, b, and c. Then the function is invertible iff f(x)=k has only one real solution. This could be determined using the cubic discriminant.

did the same way +1

Pawan pal - 4 years, 11 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...