My son asked me, "How old are you?".
And in reply, I said,
"I am your age plus half of my age".
My son is 22, how old am I?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
But how do we know his son's age is half of his? this question doesn't really make any sense "im your age plus half of my age" half of his son's age is 11 so that'd make him 33 not 44
Log in to reply
Its not asking half of his sons age its his age. But I also think it doesn't make any sense because there is no goal???? Like how could we possibly know his age so we cant know half of it.
Log in to reply
The son is 22. Let the father's age be x.
22+1/2x=x Subtract 1/2x from both sides. 22=1/2x Multiply both sides by 2 to cancel out the 1/2. 44=x Dad's age is 44.
True facts. Sons age = 22 = (1/2) * x; Father's age = x = (1 + 0.5x)
Only way this gets solved is magick, guaranteed (I have nothing)
edit: nope, his father's age is straight up beyond human introductory mathematics, calculus will give you an answer but the follow-up courses will explain why you don't know what question you're asking
edit edit: did the magick, x = 0.5x + 22; now I wonder what I did there
If you try it with any other age it doesnt work. Let's say the dad is 52, half of that is 26 not add his sons age which is 22 and you get 48, but half of 48 is 24 not 26.
Because 44 is the first number that all statements are true. Son's age plus half of mine. If he was say 52 then it wouldbe sons age plus 30. If he was 40 it would be sons age plus 18. ( It took me a moment to figure this out also) note: this is the logic of why it worksnit the math to figure it out
Look at it this way. The son states that he is 22. The father states that he is 22 plus his OWN age divided by 2. So what you're looking for is a number (n) that when divided by 2, can be added to his sons age (22) to get the original number (n).
so lets just try a few: 100, 75, 50, 45
100/2+22 = 77
75/2+22=59.5
50/2+22=47 <-- 50 ad 47 are pretty close. We're converging now.
45/2+22=44.5 <-- oh shit now we have 45 and 44.5
Let's just notch it down a touch shall we?
44/2+22=44 <-- 44 and 44 DING DING DING We have a winner :)
It's Half of the "Father's" age. Not the son's age. Please Refer the question again.
You aren't halving his sons age, you are halving his own age.....
I thnk u r right
I just thought of a great way to say it.
If the son is 22, and the father is 66, then the father could only truthfully say "I am your age plus 2/3 of my own age"
If the son is 22, and the father is (ridiculously) 33, then the father could only truthfully say "I am your age plus 1/3 of my own"
But since the son father is exactly twice the age of his son, he can say "I am your age plus half of my own".
but half of father's age(if 33, then it would be 16.5+22=38.5) not making any sense, so I stand with 44.
appreciated answer
For 44 to be correct. The wording should be:-
My son asked me, "How old are you?". And in reply, I said, "I am your age which is half of my age". (Not - Plus my of my age) My son is 22, how old am I?
Log in to reply
No. 44 is correct anyway. The logic works out, it just isn't asking the question you think it is. What the question is asking you to do is find a number that when divided by 2 and then added to 22 is equal to itself.
lets work with a different medium --age is getting dull. Two stacks of firewood are being advertised side by side. Assume that we are familiar with the vendors and trust that their ads are truthful. As a savvy patron of these vendors we'd prefer to work out what the ads mean rather than ask for help.
BEGIN
The sign on the left is titled LEFT and declares a value of 200 weight.
The sign on the right is titled RIGHT and declares a value of LEFT plus RIGHT over TWO. A formula is included below it: R = L + R / 2
What you're looking at is a description, a definition, which is perfectly analogous to the original problem. And it can either evaluate to true or false depending on what numbers you fill in. If NO NUMBER satisfies it, then the answer is 'FALSE'. But if a number CAN satisfy it, then that number is the answer.
Again, in plain english, the number you're looking for (R) is one that when divided by 2 and then added to 200 (L) will be equal to itself (R). You could use PEMDAS to solve for it, or you could just try a few numbers. Let's do that shall we? Check the formula from the sign on the right for reference
1000/2+200 = 700..... Obviously 1000 does not equal 700
500/2+200 = 450....... 500 also != 450, but it's pretty close
400/2+200 = 400....... DING DING DING We have a winner!
Also the answer I got
We know the son's age has to be half of the father's age because the statement about the father's age says his age is the sum of his son's age and half of the his age. For this to be true the son's age has to be half of the father's age, as 0.5+0.5=1. If the son's age was anything other than half of his father's, the statement would make sense or hold true, because we'd get something like 0.3+0.5=0.8, or 0.7+0.5=1.2, which would mean that the "half" of his age you added wasn't really half at all.
I agree its worded wrong, it most likely should say Im twice your age plus half you age makes him 55
Log in to reply
So you want the problem to change both it's wording and the answer just because you think he should be 55?
lol the father is 44. If we were some other age, he could not say truthfully that he is the age of his son plus half of his own age. For example if the man were 66 he could only truthfully say "I am you age plus 2/3 of my own age", and if he were 33 (rediculously), the only truthful thing he could say is "I am you age plus 1/3 of my own". But since he said "I am your age plus 1/2 of my own", we can only deduce that the man is 44.
I did it the same as you
The Question is not put right. If 44 is correct. It should be I'm twice your age. Since the legal age is 16 years plus 9 months pregnancy. The Minimum fathers age is. 22 + (22+16.75)/2= 41.375 years or 41 years 34 days.
He is half his age, let that be x, not adding his son's age, 22 makes up his age. So that means the half of his age is actually 22.
This is a question that does not have an answer that 'perfectly' makes sense given the question does not really have all the necessary information for it to make exact sense. To answer the question and establish causality the age of the father when his son was born is important (but that's making it less challenging). A=44 is an intuitive answer and is the best inference to the explanation (explanation to the given evidences or premises) but not exactly an answer.
So I think it's basically X = 22+1/2x . Subtract 22 from the 22 and the isolated x and you'll get X-22= 1/2x. Then divide the -22 and 1/2x by 1/2 and you're left with X+44= x. Then subtract the x on each side and you're left with 44!
.. that's all I got. Hopefully that's right.
Log in to reply
If you divide by .5 then you'll make the 22 = 11 and also, you forgot to divide the x by .5 so you would have x/.5 - 11 = ×
You have to make sure to do both sides completely.
If you subtract the x on each side of x+44=x you're left with 44=0. Not possible
You can't subtract/add before multiplying/dividing. PEMDAS!
Okay, so let's say the dad's age is 44.
According to the riddle the dad is the son's age plus half of his age,
If half of his age is 22 and then it is added to his son's age , which is 22, then you get 44
The answer does make sense but I did have a little trouble getting to it since the way the question was worded confused me at first
I don't get it
If you subtracted (A÷2) from both sides...... what happened to the original A on the first side?? How did you cancel it??
Log in to reply
A-A\2=A/2 subtracting a number by its half is equal to its half
You skipped something, where did the a go? A=22+(A÷2) Subtract (A÷2) from both sides A-(A÷2)=22 not A÷2=22 Flawed question, answer is A-(A÷2)=22. Good luck with that
Log in to reply
A= 22+(A÷2)=> A= 22+0.5A =>A- 0.5A =22 =>0.5A= 22 dividing both side (0.5) A= 44
D = 2 2 + 0 . 5 D 0 . 5 D = 2 2 ( 0 . 5 D ) 2 = ( 2 2 ) 2 D = 4 4
Let x be the father's age.
Therefore according to the Question,
x = 2 x + 22
x - 2 x = 22
2 x = 22
x = 4 4
Therefore His father's age is 4 4
Nice solution (+1)
How did you jump from line 2 to line 3?
Log in to reply
It would be common denominator. 2X/2-X/2 = X/2
He just solved x - (x/2). If you take half of x away from x, you're left with half of x.
You don't need any fancy equations. Two halves make a whole so if you are adding half of his age to another number and it makes his whole age, the other number must also be half. So it's just 22 + 22
Honestly, I just guessed the answer. And for some reason got it right. Sorry.
Not even a little bit....make me a bar graph where it shows the part where that math equation says his sons age is half his own age...if it said that...the equation would be best expressed in words as "I am twice your age" ...in order to solve you would need more information...you cannot figure out what half the sum is....thats like me placing a random bottle in a box and going "the bottle in this box is half full...what size is the bottle"
Log in to reply
It does say the son is half his age, just not in those exact words "I am your age plus half of my age" means "you are my age minus half of my age" and therefore "you are my age divided by 2" and from that "you are half of my age" the information is all there, just don't complain if you can't see it
2 2 + 2 1 x = x
Then do some ( very, very basic) algebra
2 1 x = 2 2 ∴ x = 4 4
The solution makes sense when thought about logically as well. Try the riddle thinking the father is 64. 22+32= 54 not 64. Similarly, if you thought the father was 30, 22+15=37, not 30. If the father was 44 though, 22+22=44, which is the age we initially assumed.
This is not as hard as everyone is treating it to be. You DO have exactly enough information. No, you aren't told the dad's age; that's what you're solving for! You ARE allowed to use half of that unknown variable within the problem; it's done in algebra frequently: x=1/2x+y. When you subtract both sides by 1/2x, the one on the right cancels and on the left you have exactly 1/2x, leaving 1/2x=y. This is followed by a direct substitution for y.
I am, meaning A = [your age=22] PLUS (+) [half of my age=A/2]
A/2 = (1/2)
A
A = 22 + (1/2)
A
Then subtract both sides by (1/2)
A to get:
A - (1/2)
A = 22
A = (2/2) A, so.... (2/2) A - (1/2) A = (1/2) A Leaving the equation to be: (1/2)*A = 22 A = 44
There is no discrepancy in the wording. Stating "I am your age plus half of my age" is crystal clear. This is, in fact, a level 1 algebra problem, and it was quick and fun to do.
Thank you for the problem, and I hope it helps somebody :P
Thank the Lord someone actually understands, I have faith in humanity again
A lot of people are having trouble with this question. The 38% failure rate makes me uncomfortable.
The logic works out, it just isn't asking the question you think it is. What the question is asking you to do is find a number (D for dad) that can be divided by 2 and then added to 22 (S for son) to be equal itself. The formula would look like this: d = s + d / 2.... or more simply, d = s * 2. But we'll work out why that is later.
lets work with a different medium --age is getting dull. Two stacks of firewood are being advertised side by side. Assume that we are familiar with the vendors and trust that their ads are truthful. As a savvy patron of these vendors we'd prefer to work out what the ads mean rather than ask for help.
BEGIN:
The sign on the left is titled LEFT and declares a value of 200 weight.
The sign on the right is titled RIGHT and declares a value of " LEFT plus RIGHT over TWO ". For clarity, a pseudo equation is included below it: "R is equal to L + R / 2 "
What you're looking at is a description, a definition, which is perfectly analogous to the original problem, and it can either evaluate to true or false depending on what numbers you fill in. If NO NUMBER satisfies the equation, then it will always evaluate to FALSE and can be said to be invalid. But if a number CAN satisfy it, then that number will cause the equation to evaluate to TRUE , and will be the so called solution, or more simply, the number you are looking for.
Again, in plain english, the number you're looking for (R) is one that when divided by 2 and then added to 200 (L) will be equal to itself (R). You could use PEMDAS to solve for it, or you could just try a few numbers. Let's do that shall we? Check the formula from the sign on the right for reference
1000 /2+200 = 700 ..... Obviously 1000 does not equal 700. Let's increment down by 500.
500 /2+200 = 450 ....... 500 also != 450, but it's pretty close. Let's increment down by 100.
400 /2+200 = 400 ....... DING DING DING We have a winner! 400 /2 * 2 = 400
Now recall above where I said that d = s + d / 2 could be more simply stated as d = s * 2? Well this is why. If you were solving for x in this problem: 400 /2 *2 = x, anyone with a brain could understand the elimination process that would take place here. Go ahead say it out loud. "four-hundred divided by two times two -- oh well it just means 400 = --- oh... it's just 400. 400 is the whole answer..."
Thank you and good night.
Guys this is really simple basic algebra, all of the necessary information is there, if your dad says to you "I am your age plus half of my age" and you're 22, what he's saying is "I am 22 plus half of my age" so the equation is - when written in words:
My age = 22 + half of my age
If you take away "half of my age" from both sides you get
Half of my age = 22
Then multiply both sides by 2 to get "My age"
My age = 44
There we go
To everyone who is confused by the wording of the question and calling it a "stupid question" just let it be known that the wording of the question is SUPPOSED to confuse you, although what it literally means is "I am twice your age", wording it like that would make it so laughably simple to solve. However, wording it the way it's worded here makes it more difficult to solve, it forces you to extract the information the right way. This is the difference between year 3 maths, and year 11 maths: problem solving.
Lol.
I thought of a somewhat different way to approach this.
The dad says "I am your age plus half my age."
If we were just to put it in simple terms, his dad is: "X (half his age) + Y"
Forget about whatever they tell you Y stands for, all you need to know is that since he already has filled in the equation with "half his age", the other part must equal half too, in order for his statement to be true.
So Y = X in other words whatever his son's age is you just double it.
Precisely...or in other words, if the father's age is 22 + half his age, the "other half" of his age must be 22.
But then if you can find the dad's age by multiplying the son's age by two, no matter his age, it won't really make sense.
So right now his son is 22, you doubled it and got 44 which is correct for his father's age, so your theory does work here
But how about next year?
The son will turn 23, so to find his fathers age would you have to double it again?
That wouldn't work though because if you double the son's age here you get 46.
How is it possible for (in the same about of time) the son aged one year while the dad aged two?
Why is there so much 5th grade math like this on this site? Or perhaps a more relevant question is, why do so many people provide wrong answers to 5th grade math? I am ashamed of America's education system.
Not everyone is American in here. This is not me trying to make a pitiful attack on you.
I just guessed as 44 sounded correct. I have no idea why it did, it just did. Math, or maths as they say in Doctor Who, to me is a total dick. I hate it, it hates me. But 44 just felt right. I did not work out age=X + 1/2age or anything of the sort. All that makes my head hurt. But I got it right anyways. I guess I sussed it out somehow.
I also got it right the same way as you. I also hate math. I also love Dr. Who. :-)
They say 'maths' in Doctor Who, because Doctor Who is made in the UK by the BBC, and so it used British English (where 'math' is not a word)
To be honest... I just guessed 44, because it doesn't made amy sense for my level of mathematics...
But when I read some other answers they do make sense.
I am your age (22). Plus half of my age. Im thinking that the "dad" trying to telling us that his age is 22 plus half of his age, which is 22:2=11. So, it will be "dad"'s age which is "your age" = 22 + 11 = 33. But 44 is more intuitive answer here.
this question is stupid and the people who says 44 are stupid
by the way A=22+(A/2) it is not = (A/2)=22 BUT >>> A / (a/2)= 22+(A/2 )/ a/2
I Hope u understand the Real problem of this stupid Question
Why are you dividing both sides by a fraction? If you subtract that fraction instead, it works perfectly, unless your lower case a means three son's age. If it does, then you are simply reading the question wrong.
To think of it another way, in making a good guess what numbers could you expect from the simplistic statements? The numbers I could expect would be at rates of 1.5x, 2x, 2.5x, and 3x (x being 22) without even really thinking through the problem. However, after reading the problem, any number past 22 would be possible if you assume the father's age to be 22 + half of any number. Yet because there are infinitely many numbers to choose from and because you could end with decimal answers instead of integers, it discounts itself from being a "good" guess and eliminates the 2.5x and 3x as possibilities as no other reasoning seems to exist to support them. The remaining ages of 33 and 44 could still be assumed by other logic (though with fallacies in some) as shown below:
1. 22 + 11(if you assumed that the father's age was set at 22 by the previous statement in terms akin to Java coding)
2. 22 + 22 (if you assumed directly to the point that half of the father's age = son's age)
3. 22 + .5x =x (as better stated by others).
However of the two possible solutions 33 is just creepy as the father would have had to be 11 when the son was born, so... the father should be 44 thinking realistically. If there are others I missed please feel free to add them to the comments. Just don't go too far with observations, like making the father 5000 years old, he would be a mummy then.
we know that the son's age (22)+half the dad's age (1/2x) is equal to the dad's age (x). this can be written as an equation...
22+1/2x=x
22=1/2x
x=44
Short non-mathy answer to the problem: If I'm trying to find a sum and have to add half of the sum to a pre-existing amount, then half of the sum is already there. 22 (the son's age) was the pre-existing amount so half of the dad's age is 22. 22+22=44.
This is a senseless question the answers are only related to the logic of algebra and worked only out on that number 22, take other numbers and that age of tbe father depending on those .
Assume Dad's age=x As x-1/2x=1/2×, 1/2x(half of Dad's age)=son's age Therefore,22×2=44
You can try the same but different fractions like one-third,etc
Eg. Assume Dad's age is 1/3 of his son, As x-1/3x=2/3×, 2/3x(half of Dad's age)+1/3 of son's age= Dad's age So Dad is three times older(son's age is 1/3x) Therefore,22×3=66
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
Dad's age is A :
A = 2 2 + ( A ÷ 2 )
Subtract ( A ÷ 2 ) from both sides.
( A ÷ 2 ) = 2 2
Multiply both sides by 2
A = 4 4