Let p be a prime number and a , n positive integers. If 2 p + 3 p = a n then n = ?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
Thank you.
Let's first consider the case p = 2 . Then 2 2 + 3 2 = 1 3 . 1 3 is not a perfect power, just 1 3 = 1 3 1 . Let's now consider the bigger case of odd p . If p is odd then we have that 2 p + 3 p = ( 2 + 3 ) ( 2 p − 1 − 2 p − 2 3 + . . . + 3 p − 1 ) = 5 ( 2 p − 1 + 2 p − 2 3 + . . . + 3 p − 1 ) . The equality given in the problem would then imply that a n ≡ 0 m o d 5 ⟹ a ≡ 0 m o d 5 . This means that we can say that a = 5 a 0 and rephrase the equality in terms of this new variable:
2 p + 3 p = 5 n a 0 n
Dividing both sides by 5 we get:
( 2 p − 1 − 2 p − 2 3 + . . . + 3 p − 1 ) = 5 n − 1 a 0 n
If we assume that n > 1 then this implies that 2 p − 1 + 2 p − 2 3 + . . . + 3 p − 1 ≡ 0 m o d 5 . We will prove that this is impossible:
Notice that 3 ≡ − 2 m o d 5 . This implies that 2 p − 1 − 2 p − 2 3 + . . . + 3 p − 1 = n = 0 ∑ p − 1 ( − 1 ) n 2 p − 1 − n 3 n ≡ n = 0 ∑ p − 1 ( − 1 ) 2 n 2 p − 1 ≡ 2 p − 1 n = 0 ∑ p − 1 1 ≡ 2 p − 1 p ≡ 0 m o d 5 .
The last congruence is true as long as p = 5 . As such, we must check that case too: 2 5 + 3 5 = 2 7 5 = 5 2 × 1 1 which is also not a perfect power.
This contradiction came from the assumption that n > 1 . Therefore, it must be that n = 1 always.
Thank you for sharing a nice solution.
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
prime numbers defination
another relevance wiki , wiki of day . Why 2 is prime?
Let be p = 2
( 2 2 ) + ( 3 2 )
(4+9 = 13)
13 1 = 2 2 + 3 2
Note : If (p = prime) , the root of (n) must be not perfect.
∴ a l w a y s ( n 1 ) = ( 2 p r i m e + 3 p r i m e ) .