What is this mess?

Algebra Level 5

f ( x ) = 10 3 x x ! , x N f(x)=\dfrac{103^{x}}{x!}, \quad x\in \mathbb{N}

If the values of x x for which f ( x ) f(x) is maximum are x 1 , x 2 , , x n x_{1},x_{2},\ldots, x_{n} , then find n + j = 1 n x j n+\displaystyle \sum^{n}_{j=1}x_{j} .


The answer is 207.

This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and, finally, (c) loading the non-javascript version of this page . We're sorry about the hassle.

1 solution

Zee Ell
Sep 5, 2016

It is easy to see, that for x > 1:

f ( x ) = 10 3 x x ! = 103 × 10 3 x 1 x × ( x 1 ) ! = 103 x f ( x 1 ) f(x) = \frac {103^x}{x!} = \frac {103 × 103^{x - 1}}{x × (x - 1)!} = \frac {103}{x} f(x - 1)

Now, our discrete f(x) is increasing, when:

f(x - 1) < f(x)

Since f(x) is always positive, this is equivalent to:

1 < f ( x ) f ( x 1 ) 1 < \frac {f(x)}{f(x - 1)}

1 < 103 x 1 < \frac {103}{x}

x < 103 x < 103

We can also find (by substituting x = 103 into our first formula), that:

f ( 103 ) = 103 103 f ( 102 ) = f ( 102 ) f(103) = \frac {103}{103} f(102) = f(102)

This means, that f(x) has its maximum at x = 102 and since f(103) = f(102) (and f(x - 1) > f(x) for x > 103 (can be proven by simply exchanging"<" for ">" at our steps above), therefore we have:

2 maximum values at x = 102 and x = 103

Hence, the solution is:

2 + 102 + 103 = 207 2 + 102 + 103 = \boxed {207}

Pretty easy but damn complex looking question.

Shreyash Rai - 4 years, 9 months ago

Nice solution but please explain me how you got this ?

"f(103) = f(102)"

Priyanshu Mishra - 4 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

f ( x ) = 10 3 x x ! = 103 × 10 3 x 1 x × ( x 1 ) ! = 103 x f ( x 1 ) f(x) = \frac {103^x}{x!} = \frac {103 × 103^{x - 1}}{x × (x - 1)!} = \frac {103}{x} f(x - 1)

f ( 103 ) = 103 103 f ( 102 ) = f ( 102 ) f(103) = \frac {103}{103} f(102) = f(102)

I also adjusted the solution to include this.

Zee Ell - 4 years, 9 months ago

Log in to reply

Oh i should have rather noted that earlier.

Anyways, thanks for your reply. i Understood that.

Priyanshu Mishra - 4 years, 9 months ago

0 pending reports

×

Problem Loading...

Note Loading...

Set Loading...