What is wrong with this sign?
This section requires Javascript.
You are seeing this because something didn't load right. We suggest you, (a) try
refreshing the page, (b) enabling javascript if it is disabled on your browser and,
finally, (c)
loading the
non-javascript version of this page
. We're sorry about the hassle.
easy
Price of 10 wings is too expensive...
that's why i hate marketing's trick...
Price of 10 wings is too expensive.,is the right answer
I also solved this problem, hahahahahaha
how about 3 piece for $1.99 ? if divide it by 3 it is 0.66, then if you multiplied it by 5 the result was more than $3 ?? how this happen ?
Log in to reply
That's not much...as if we see at most places the things which are less cost more sometimes..so it is not assumed so!!
the Price of 10 wings is too expensive...
Price of 10 wings is expensive than other two
10 wings is too expensive
10 wings is too expensive
what would you do to see the board ?
3 is also too expensive.3/5x3=1.6
price of 10 wing is to expensive
Okay... weird problem. Anyways, first find how much everything is per wing. Let's set up some proportions: 3 5 = 2 3 when we solve for the 5 wings versus 3 wings. Cross multiplying, 1 0 = 9 . So those two are just about the same price per wing. Let's try the 10 wing deal. 9 1 0 = 3 5 . Cross multiplying, we produce 3 0 = 4 5 which is seriously off. Thus, the 10 piece wings are too expensive.
i wont buy that 10 wings. thats too much for my stomach
Yeah i basically did the same, simplified them and compared them
nailed it by just looking at it.
Indeed weird problem, if it is as such, the 3 wings are also too expensive...waste of points omg
10 piece expencsive
5 piece cheapest
10 pcs is costlier.. there should be written 3.99 $ for 5 pcs. So one should buy two cups of 5 pcs chicken with only 6 $..
5 pcs = 3$. 5 2 = 10 so 3$ 2 = 6$ so $8.99 is so expensive for a 10 piece
so expensive for ten piece
the 10 wings are too expensive. i want buy the 8 wings one because cheaper
I did the same to, but with how obese America is, that store which is probably McDonalds can charge whatever they like.
Log in to reply
thats got nothing to do with obesion buddy. in fact, mc.donald's itself would be in loss here, as one would buy two 5 pieces instead of buying a single 10 piece!!
While it's not good math...it is good marketing...People all to often assume that the sellers have their best interests at heart, and they will give you a discount for buying more...not always the case (actually I'm finding it's rarely the case anymore)... At the grocery store, lately, it has behooved me to purchase two smaller items, because it's cheaper than buying the "bargain" size! They are banking on your assumptions to make them some cash! Yet another reason, as I always tell my kids, you MUST know math!
5 is cheapest, but There is NOTHING WRONG with this pricing. This is INDUCED Marketing Technic. You came to buy 5 pieces only. But looking at the price structure, you are tempted to buy TWO piece deals. You though guys at McDonald are crazy and don't know maths. But in fact they forced you to buy an 'extra' 5 piece deal while you only needed 1 deal. You are thinking that you are outsmarting McDonald, while in fact they are outsmarting you and making good sales on that day. :)
I wonder where Arron took this photo.Look at the contrast of the $3, it seems to have been Photoshopped.
It wasn't photoshopped. What happened was that McDonalds wanted to run a promotion on 5 piece nuggets, and hence lowered the price (which explains why the contrast is different). However, they didn't consider the effect on 10 piece nuggets.
This happens very often, for a variety of reasons. For example, in supermarkets / grocery stores, there might be a promotion on 12 cans of coke, which make it less than half the price of 20 cans of coke. Take a look at April's solution above.
This problem can be solved by method of linear equations.
First of all, lets find the cost of 1 chicken wing (Since 3*x=$1.99) where x=cost of 1 chicken wing, Then, x=1.99/3, x=$0.66
Let us check this value for 3 x=$1.99 Hence, for 3 x=$1.99, 3*(0.66)=$1.98,~$1.99 which is approximately correct.
Hence, for 5 x=$3.0, 5 (0.6)=$3.0, which is correct
But, for 10 x=$8.99, 10 (0.6)=$6.0, which is less than the amount $8.99 given in the problem Hence, the ten piece wings are too expensive.
If 5 chicken wings cost $3,10 chicken wings cost [(3/5)*10]=$6. The price on the board for the 10 pieces was $8.99,which is $2.99 more than the actual price.Which is why,the price for 10 chicken wings according to the board,is the mistake.
$1,99 / 3 = 0,66333... If you multiply by 10, will be $6,6333... So, the price for 10 is very expensive.
Calculate the price of a single unit, it is cheapest for 5 pieces @ $3 deal ($ 0.6 per unit). 10 pieces @ $8.99 is the costliest ($ 0.899 per unit).
It's a general understanding that if the number of pieces of wings increases the price also increases but not in equal amount. Here cost of 3 wings is 1.99$ and cost of 5 wings is 3.00$ . Hence cost of 10 wings must be less than (2 * cost of 5 wings) . Therefore cost of 10 wings cannot be 8.99$ and it can be around 5$.
The ten piece wings are too expensive three piece 1.99$ Means ten piece 6.6$^ but ten piece 10 $
https://imgur.com/WwHccHx
Compare the prices of 3 chicken wings in both pictures. Click on the link above
cost of 1 wing=1.99/3=0.6633
cost of 5 wings=0.6633*5=3.3165(given cost=3.00)
Cost of 10 wings=0.6633*10=6.633 (given cost=8.99),
We can see that cost of 10 wings is most expensive in compare to others
5 wings for $3 ==> 15 wings for $9 But here only 10 wings for ~$9
10 are too expensive
Problem Loading...
Note Loading...
Set Loading...
You can simply see that since 5 chicken wings cost $ 3 , then 1 0 chicken wings should cost about $ ( 3 × 2 ) = $ 6 .
But, here in the price board, it shows that the price for 1 0 wings is $ 8 . 9 9 which is way higher than the price the wings should cost. So, the problem with the price board is The price for 10 wings is way too expensive.
P.S - I don't think that finding price of 1 chicken wing and then comparing prices using unitary method is really necessary here as you can find the just avg. price of the 1 0 wings by multiplying the price of 5 wings from the board by 2 . I however ain't saying that solution is incorrect..I just think it's unnecessary..